0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Dynamic Differential Pressure Effects on Drilling of Permeable Formations

[+] Author and Article Information
L. L. Hoberock, G. J. Bratcher

School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 218 EN, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-5016

J. Energy Resour. Technol 120(2), 118-123 (Jun 01, 1998) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2795021 History: Received July 25, 1996; Revised February 06, 1998; Online November 06, 2007

Abstract

In the mathematical modeling of bit penetration rate for tri-cone roller bits in permeable formations, virtually all of the current techniques assume that the differential pressure between the bottom-hole wellbore pressure and the formation is a “static” value. This work shows that the appropriate differential pressure is a dynamic quantity, because for overbalanced drilling, fluid filtrate from the wellbore requires a finite time to flow into the formation, producing a changing pressure gradient ahead of the bit. Moreover, this dynamic gradient is directly dependent upon the rate of drill bit penetration, which is in turn dependent upon the dynamic gradient itself. Accordingly, coupled penetration rate and dynamic gradient equations must be solved, which frequently result in the prediction of higher drilling penetration rates than when the static gradient is used. The appropriate dynamic differential pressure equations are developed and applied to an example drilling situation. It is shown that with water-based drilling fluids, for rock with permeability greater than a few microdarcies at virtually all penetration rates, and for penetration rates less than 3 m/h (9.84 ft/h) at permeabilities greater than 1 μd (microdarcy), the dynamic differential pressure is significantly less than the static differential pressure. Accordingly, using the conventional static differential pressure results in the prediction of penetration rates that are much too low. Moreover, using measured penetration rates from the field, the conventional approach yields predicted in-situ rock strength that is much too high.

Copyright © 1998 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In