0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System Model for Automotive Vehicle Simulation and Control

[+] Author and Article Information
Daisie D. Boettner, Gino Paganelli, Yann G. Guezennec, Giorgio Rizzoni, Michael J. Moran

Department of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Automotive Research and Intelligent Transportation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210

J. Energy Resour. Technol 124(1), 20-27 (Mar 25, 2002) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1447927 History: Received March 07, 2001; Revised August 21, 2001; Online March 25, 2002
Copyright © 2002 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Brahma, A., Guezennec, Y., and Rizzoni, G., 2000, “Dynamic Optimization of Mechanical/Electrical Power Flow in Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Proc., AVEC 2000, 5th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, Ann Arbor, MI, Aug.
Paganelli,  G., Guerra,  T. M., Delprat,  S., Santin,  J. J., Delhom,  M., and Combes,  E., 2000, “Simulation and Assessment of Power Control Strategies for a Parallel Hybrid Car,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engin., Part D J Automob. Eng., 214, No. 7, pp. 705–717.
Delprat, S., Guerra, T. M., Paganelli, G., Lauber, J., and Delhom, M., 2001, “Control Strategy Optimization for a Hybrid Parallel Powertrain,” Proc. American Control Conference, Arlington, VA, June 25–27.
Rizzoni, G., Guezennec, Y., Brahma, A., Wei, X., and Miller, T., 2000, “VP-SIM: A Unified Approach to Energy and Power Flow Modeling Simulation and Analysis of Hybrid Vehicles,” SAE Future Car Congress, Crystal City, VA, Apr., Paper 2000-01-1565.
Hirschenhofer, J. H., Stauffer, D. B., Engleman, R. R., and Klett, M. G., 1998, Fuel Cell Handbook, Fourth Edition, DOE/FETC-99/1076.
Thomas, S., and Zalbowitz, M., 1999, Fuel Cells Green Power, LA-UR-99-3231, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
Appleby, A. J., and Foulkes, F. R., 1993, Fuel Cell Handbook, Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, FL.
Springer,  T. E., Zawodzinski,  T. A., and Gottesfeld,  S., 1991, “Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell Model,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, No. 8, pp. 2334–2342.
Srinivasan,  S., Velev,  O. A., Parthasarathy,  O. A., Mando,  D. J., and Appleby,  A. J., 1991, “High Energy Efficiency and High Power Density Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells—Electrode Kinetics and Mass Transport,” J. Power Sources, 36, pp. 299–320.
Amphlett,  J. C., Baumert,  R. M., Mann,  R. F., Peppley,  B. A., and Roberge,  P. R., 1995, “Performance Modeling of the Ballard Mark IV Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell, I. Mechanistic Model Development,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, No. 1, pp. 1–8 Jan.
Amphlett,  J. C., Baumert,  R. M., Mann,  R. F., Peppley,  B. A., and Roberge,  P. R., 1995, “Performance Modeling of the Ballard Mark IV Solid Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell, II. Empirical Model Development,” J. Electrochem. Soc., 142, No. 1, pp. 9–15 Jan.
Mann,  R. F., Amphlett,  J. C., Hooper,  M. A. I., Jensen,  H. M., Peppley,  B. A., and Roberge,  P. R., 2000, “Development and Application of a Generalized Steady-State Electrochemical Model for a PEM Fuel Cell,” J. Power Sources, 86, pp. 173–180.
Lee,  J. H., Lalk,  T. R., and Appleby,  A. J., 1998, “Modeling Electrochemical Performance in Large Scale Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stacks,” J. Power Sources, 70, pp. 258–268.
Gurau, V., Liu, H., and Kakac, S., 1998, “Mathematical Model for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells,” Proc. Advanced Energy Systems Division, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, November 15–20, Vol. 38 , pp. 205–214.
Ogden,  J. M., Steinbugler,  M. M., and Kreutz,  T. G., 1999, “A Comparison of Hydrogen, Methanol and Gasoline as Fuels for Fuel Cell Vehicles: Implications for Vehicle Design and Infrastructure Development,” J. Power Sources, 79, pp. 143–168.
Rodatz, P., Guzzella, L., and Pellizzari, L., 2000, “System Design and Supervisory Controller Development for a Fuel-Cell Vehicle,” Proc., 1st International Federation of Automatic Control Conference on Mechatronic Systems, Vol. 1 , Darmstadt, Germany, September, 18–20, pp. 173–178.
Johansson, K., and Alvfors, P., 2000, “Steady-State Model of a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell System for Automotive Applications,” Proc. International Symposium ECOS, From Thermo-Economics to Sustainability, Part 1, ed., G. G. Hirs, Universiteit Twente, Nederland, pp. 725–736.
Barbir, F., Balasubramanian, B., and Neutzler, J., 1999, “Trade-off Design Analysis of Operating Pressure and Temperature in PEM Fuel Cell Systems,” Proc. Advanced Energy Systems Division, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nashville, TN, November 14–19, Vol. 39, pp. 305–315.
Friedman, D. J., 1999, “Maximizing Direct-Hydrogen PEM Fuel Cell Vehicle Efficiency—Is Hybridization Necessary?” Fuel Cell Power for Transportation (SP-1425), SAE Publication Paper 1999-01-0530, pp. 9–17.
Geyer, H. K., and Ahluwalia, R. K., 1998, GCtool for Fuel Cell Systems Design and Analysis: User Documentation, ANL-98/8, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, for U.S. Department of Energy under Contract W-31-109-Eng-38.
Bejan, A., Tsatsaronis, G., and Moran, M., 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
Boettner, D., Paganelli, G., Guezennec, Y., Rizzoni, G., and Moran, M., 2001, “Component Power Sizing and Limits of Operation for Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Fuel Cell/Battery Hybrid Automotive Applications,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Session: Advanced Automotive Technologies—II, Session No. DSC-8, November 11–16.
Boettner, D., 2001, “Modeling of PEM Fuel Cell Systems Including Controls and Reforming Effects for Hybrid Automotive Applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Voltage-current density relationship at varying pressures for fuel cell operating temperature of 353 K
Grahic Jump Location
Voltage-current density relationship at varying temperatures for cathode pressure of 3 atm
Grahic Jump Location
Power density-current density relationship at varying pressures for fuel cell operating temperature of 353 K
Grahic Jump Location
Power density-current density relationship at varying temperatures for cathode pressure of 3 atm
Grahic Jump Location
Exergetic efficiency-current density relationship at varying pressures for fuel cell operating temperatures of 353 K
Grahic Jump Location
Exergetic efficiency-current density relationship at varying temperatures for cathode pressure of 3 atm
Grahic Jump Location
PEM fuel cell system schematic
Grahic Jump Location
Fuel cell and fuel cell system power density versus current density
Grahic Jump Location
Relative magnitude of auxiliary components power requirements
Grahic Jump Location
Exergetic efficiency comparison of ideal control against no air control
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of actual velocity and desired velocity during FHDS simulation
Grahic Jump Location
Fuel cell stack operating temperature during FHDS simulation

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In