0
DESIGN INNOVATION PAPER

Microgrid Viability for Small-Scale Cooling, Heating, and Power

[+] Author and Article Information
Lubomir A. Ribarov1

Combustion Group,  United Technologies Research Center, 411 Silver Lane, MS 129-29, East Hartford, CT 06108

David S. Liscinsky

Combustion Group,  United Technologies Research Center, 411 Silver Lane, MS 129-29, East Hartford, CT 06108

1

Corresponding author.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 129(1), 71-78 (May 09, 2006) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2424967 History: Received July 19, 2005; Revised May 09, 2006

Cooling, heating, and power (CHP) energy systems provide higher fuel efficiency than conventional systems, resulting in reduced fuel consumption, reduced emissions, and other environmental benefits. Until recently the focus of CHP system development has been primarily on medium-scale commercial applications in a limited number of market segments where clear value propositions lead to short term payback. Small-scale integrated CHP systems that show promise of achieving economic viability through significant improvements in fuel utilization have received increased attention lately. In this paper the economic potential is quantified for small-scale (microgrid) integrated CHP systems suitable for groups of buildings with aggregate electric loads in the 15120kW range. Technologies are evaluated for community building groups (CBGs) consisting of aggregation of pure residential entities and combined residential and light commercial entities. Emphasis is on determination of the minimum load size (i.e., the smallest electric and thermal load for a given CBG that is supplied with electric, heating, cooling power from a CHP) for which a microgrid CHP system is both technically and economically viable. In this paper, the operation of the CHP system is parallel with the public utility grid at all times, i.e., the grid is interconnected. Evaluations of CHP technology options using simulation studies in a “three-dimensional” space (CHP technology option, CBG load aggregation, and geographical location in the USA) were evaluated based on comparisons of net present value (NPV). The simulations indicated that as electric load increases, the viability of the CHP system (independent of the system’s size) becomes more favorable. Exceeding a system runtime (utilization) of 70% was shown to pass the break-even line in the NPV analysis. Finally, geographic location was found to have a relatively weak effect on the reported trends. These results suggest that microgrid CHP systems have the potential to be economically viable with relative independence of geographic location if adequately sized to match the specific load requirements.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic representation of a CHP system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

CHP modeling tool architecture

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Schematic of a simplified CHP thermodynamic model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Comparison by city of the 3‐years NPV of all modeled cases

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison by unit size of all modeled cases

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Comparison of runtime by city

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Comparison of runtime by CBG load for the 30kW system

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Comparison of runtime by unit size

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In