0
Research Papers: Alternative Energy Sources

Impact of Component Sizing in Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Energy Resource and Greenhouse Emissions Reduction1

[+] Author and Article Information
Andreas A. Malikopoulos

Energy & Transportation Science Division,
Oak Ridge National Laboratory,
Knoxville, TN 37932
e-mail: andreas@ornl.gov

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The U.S. government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. government purposes.

Contributed by the Internal Combustion Engine Division of ASME for publication in the Journal of Energy Resources Technology. Manuscript received September 20, 2012; final manuscript received December 18, 2012; published online May 27, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Timothy J. Jacobs.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 135(4), 041201 (May 27, 2013) (9 pages) Paper No: JERT-12-1213; doi: 10.1115/1.4023334 History: Received September 20, 2012; Revised December 18, 2012

Widespread use of alternative hybrid powertrains currently appears inevitable and many opportunities for substantial progress remain. The necessity for environmentally friendly vehicles, in conjunction with increasing concerns regarding U.S. dependency on foreign oil and climate change, has led to significant investment in enhancing the propulsion portfolio with new technologies. Recently, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) have attracted considerable attention due to their potential to reduce petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transportation sector. PHEVs are especially appealing for short daily commutes with excessive stop-and-go driving. However, the high costs associated with their components, and in particular, with their energy storage systems have been significant barriers to extensive market penetration of PHEVs. In the research reported here, we investigated the implications of motor/generator and battery size on fuel economy and GHG emissions in a medium duty PHEV. An optimization framework is proposed and applied to two different parallel powertrain configurations, pretransmission and post transmission, to derive the Pareto frontier with respect to motor/generator and battery size. The optimization and modeling approach adopted here facilitates better understanding of the potential benefits from proper selection of motor/generator and battery size on fuel economy and GHG emissions. This understanding can help us identify the appropriate sizing of these components and thus reducing the PHEV cost. Addressing optimal sizing of PHEV components could aim at an extensive market penetration of PHEVs.

Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Lin, C.-C., Peng, H., Grizzle, J. W., and Kang, J.-M., 2003, “Power Management Strategy for a Parallel Hybrid Electric Truck,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 11, pp. 839–849. [CrossRef]
Pisu, P., and Rizzoni, G., 2007, “A Comparative Study of Supervisory Control Strategies for Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 15, pp. 506–518. [CrossRef]
Sciarretta, A., Back, M., and Guzzella, L., 2004, “Optimal Control of Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., 12, pp. 352–363. [CrossRef]
Sciarretta, A., and Guzzella, L., 2007, “Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 27, pp. 60–70. [CrossRef]
Delprat, S., Lauber, J., Guerra, T. M., and Rimaux, J., 2004, “Control of a Parallel Hybrid Powertrain: Optimal Control,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 53, pp. 872–881. [CrossRef]
Antoniou, A. I., Komyathy, J., Bench, J., and Emadi, A., 2007, “Modeling and Simulation of Various Hybrid-Electric Configurations of the High-Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle (HMMWV),” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 56, pp. 459–465. [CrossRef]
West, R. E., and Kreith, F., 2006, “A Vision for a Secure Transportation System Without Hydrogen or Oil,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 128, pp. 236–243. [CrossRef]
Himelic, J. B., and Kreith, F., 2011, “Potential Benefits of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Consumers and Electric Power Utilities,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 133, pp. 031001–031006. [CrossRef]
Gong, Q., Li, Y., and Peng, Z.-R., 2008, “Trip-Based Optimal Power Management of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 57, pp. 3393–3401. [CrossRef]
Johannesson, L., Asbogard, M., and Egardt, B., 2007, “Assessing the Potential of Predictive Control for Hybrid Vehicle Powertrains Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 8, pp. 71–83. [CrossRef]
Khaligh, A., Miraoui, A., and Garret, D., 2009, “Special Section on Vehicular Energy-Storage Systems,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 58, pp. 3879–3881. [CrossRef]
Wirasingha, S. G., and Emadi, A., 2011, “Classification and Review of Control Strategies for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 111–122. [CrossRef]
Samaras, C., and Meisterling, K., 2008, “Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles: Implications for Policy,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, pp. 3170–3176. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guzzella, L., and Amstutz, A., 1999, “CAE Tools for Quasi-Static Modeling and Optimization of Hybrid Powertrains,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 48, pp. 1762–1769. [CrossRef]
Wang, L., Collins, E. G., Jr., and Li, H., 2011, “Optimal Design and Real-Time Control for Energy Management in Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 1419–1429. [CrossRef]
Sung Chul, O., 2005, “Evaluation of Motor Characteristics for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using the Hardware-in-the-Loop Concept,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 54, pp. 817–824. [CrossRef]
Inoa, E., and Wang, J., 2011, “PHEV Charging Strategies for Maximized Energy Saving,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 2978–2986. [CrossRef]
Tara, E., Shahidinejad, S., Filizadeh, S., and Bibeau, E., 2010, “Battery Storage Sizing in a Retrofitted Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 59, pp. 2786–2794. [CrossRef]
Triger, L., Paterson, J., and Drozdz, P., 1993, “Hybrid Vehicle Engine Size Optimization,” SAE Future Transportation Technology Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, SAE Paper No. 931793.
Aceves, S. M., Smith, J. R., Perkins, L. J., Haney, S. W., and Flowers, D. L., 1996, “Optimization of a CNG Series Hybrid Concept Vehicle,” SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, MI, SAE Paper No. 960234.
Moore, T., 1996, “Tools and Strategies for Hybrid-Electric Drivesystem Optimization,” SAE Future Transportation Technology Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, SAE Paper No. 961660.
Zoelch, U., and Schroeder, D., 1998, “Dynamic Optimization Method for Design and Rating of the Components of a Hybrid Vehicle,” Int. J. Veh. Des., 19, pp. 1–13.
Assanis, D., Delagrammatikas, G., Fellini, R., Filipi, Z., Liedtke, J., Michelena, N., Papalambros, P., Reyes, D., Rosenbaum, D., Sales, A., and Sasena, M., 1999, “An Optimization Approach to Hybrid Electric Propulsion System Design,” Mech. Struct. Mach., 27(4), pp. 393–421. [CrossRef]
Fellini, R., Michelena, N., Papalambros, P., and Sasena, M., 1999, “Optimal Design of Automotive Hybrid Powertrain Systems,” Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Los Alamitos, CA, Feb. 1–3, pp. 400–405.
Shiau, C. S. N., Kaushal, N., Hendrickson, C. T., Peterson, S. B., Whitacre, J. F., and Michalek, J. J., 2010, “Optimal Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicle Design and Allocation for Minimum Life Cycle Cost, Petroleum Consumption, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions,” ASME J. Mech. Des., 132, p. 091013. [CrossRef]
Yusaf, T. F., 2009, “Diesel Engine Optimization for Electric Hybrid Vehicles,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 131, p. 012203. [CrossRef]
Crane, D. T., and Bell, L. E., 2009, “Design to Maximize Performance of a Thermoelectric Power Generator With a Dynamic Thermal Power Source,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 131, p. 0124011. [CrossRef]
Gurkaynak, Y., Khaligh, A., and Emadi, A., 2009, “State of the Art Power Management Algorithms for Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” 5th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC '09, Dearborn, MI, Sept. 7–10, pp. 388–394.
Bumby, J. R., and Forster, I., 1987, “Optimisation and Control of a Hybrid Electric Car,” IEE Proc.-D: Control Theory Appl., 134, pp. 373–387. [CrossRef]
Capata, R., and Lora, M., 2007, “The LETHE Gas Turbine Hybrid Prototype Vehicle of the University of Roma 1: Drive Cycle Analysis of Model Vehicle Management Unit,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 129, pp. 107–116. [CrossRef]
Filipi, Z. S., Louca, L. S., Daran, B., Lin, C.-C., Yildir, U., Wu, B., Kokkolaras, M., Assanis, D. N., Peng, H., Papalambros, P. Y., and Stein, J. L., 2004, “Combined Optimization of Design and Power Management of the Hydraulic Hybrid Propulsion System for a 6 × 6 Medium Truck,” Heavy Vehicle Sys., Int. J. Vehicle Des., 11(3–4), pp. 372–402. [CrossRef]
Wu, L., Wang, Y., Yuan, X., and Chen, Z., 2011, “Multiobjective Optimization of HEV Fuel Economy and Emissions Using the Self-Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 2458–2470. [CrossRef]
Nino-Baron, C. E., Tariq, A. R., Zhu, G., and Strangas, E. G., 2011, “Trajectory Optimization for the Engine-Generator Operation of a Series Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 2438–2447. [CrossRef]
Syed, F. U., Kuang, M. L., Smith, M., Okubo, S., and Ying, H., 2009, “Fuzzy Gain-Scheduling Proportional-Integral Control for Improving Engine Power and Speed Behavior in a Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 58, pp. 69–84. [CrossRef]
Solano Martinez, J., Hissel, D., Pera, M.-C., and Amiet, M., 2011, “Practical Control Structure and Energy Management of a Testbed Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 4139–4152. [CrossRef]
Sezer, V., Gokasan, M., and Bogosyan, S., 2011, “A Novel ECMS and Combined Cost Map Approach for High-Efficiency Series Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 60, pp. 3557–3570. [CrossRef]
Malikopoulos, A. A., and Smith, D. E., 2011, “An Optimization Model for Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles,” Proceedings of 2011 Fall Technical Conference of the ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division, Morgantown, WV, pp. 739–748.
Himelic, J. B., and Kreith, F., 2011, “Potential Benefits of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles for Consumers and Electric Power Utilities,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 133(3), p. 031001. [CrossRef]
Songqing, S., and Wang, G. G., 2010, “Metamodeling for High Dimensional Simulation-Based Design Problems,” J. Mech. Des., 132, p. 051009. [CrossRef]
Astrom, K. J., and Wittenmark, B., 1995, Adaptive Control: Second Edition, Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Boston.
US Environmental Protection Agency, 2005, “Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline and Diesel Fuel,” Office or Transportation and Air Quality, EPA420-F-05-00, http://www.etieco.com/content-files/EPA emissions calc 420f05001.pdf, accessed on March, 2011.
Weber, C. L., Jaramillo, P., Marriott, J., and Samaras, C., 2010, “Life Cycle Assessment and Grid Electricity: What do We Know and What Can We Know?,” Environ. Sci. Technol., 44(6), pp. 1895–1901. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hicks, C. R., and Turner, K. V., 1999, Fundamental Concepts in the Design of Experiments, 5th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Japanese driving cycle

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Norm of residuals of the polynomial metamodel for fuel economy versus the order of the polynomial

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Norm of residuals of the polynomial metamodel for greenhouse gas emissions versus the order of the polynomial

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Norm of residuals of the polynomial metamodel for an acceleration time of 0–30 mph versus the order of the polynomial

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Norm of residuals of the polynomial metamodel for an acceleration time of 0–60 mph versus the order of the polynomial

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Fuel economy variation in PHEV pretransmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Fuel economy variation in PHEV post transmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

GHG emissions in PHEV pretransmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

GHG emissions in PHEV post transmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Pareto frontier in PHEV pretransmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Optimal set of the motor/generator and battery size corresponding to the Pareto frontier in the PHEV pretransmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Pareto frontier in PHEV post transmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Optimal set of the motor/generator and battery size corresponding to the Pareto frontier in the PHEV post transmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Vehicle mass in kilograms (kg) for the PHEV pretransmission configuration

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Vehicle mass in kilograms (kg) for the PHEV post transmission configuration

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In