0
Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Enhancing Oil Recovery With Bottom Water Drainage Completion

[+] Author and Article Information
Ephim Shirman

Schlumberger, PTS,
16a bld 3 Leningradskoe Shosse,
Moscow 125171, Russia
e-mail: eshirman@slb.com

Andrew K. Wojtanowicz

Louisiana State University,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: awojtan@lsu.edu

Hilal Kurban

Chevron NA DWEP,
1500 Louisiana, Room 37-179,
Houston, TX 77002
e-mail: HKurban@chevron.com

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 29, 2013; final manuscript received September 20, 2014; published online October 21, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Arash Dahi Taleghani.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 136(4), 042906 (Oct 21, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-13-1253; doi: 10.1115/1.4028691 History: Received August 29, 2013; Revised September 20, 2014

Field trials and physical modeling of wells with downhole water sink (DWS) completions have demonstrated controlled water coning and increased oil production rate. However, no field trials were long enough to show DWS potential in improving of oil recovery in comparison with conventional wells. Presented here are theoretical and experimental results from a DWS recovery performance study. The recovery study involved experiments with a physical model and computer simulations. The experimental results reveal that DWS dramatically accelerates the recovery process; a fivefold increase of the oil production rate was reached by adjusting the water drainage rate at the bottom completion. The results also show a 70% increase of oil recovery; from 0.52 to 0.88 for conventional and DWS completions, respectively. The computer-simulated experiments with commercial reservoir simulator demonstrate progressive improvement of recovery with downhole water drainage from 0.61 to 0.79 with no drainage and maximum drainage, respectively—a 24% increase of recovery factor, and a fivefold reduction of the time required to reach the limiting value of water cut, 0.98. However, the accelerated recovery process with DWS requires a substantial, up to 3.5-fold, increase of total water production. The simulation experiments also show that the main advantage of using DWS is its flexibility in controlling the recovery process. For conventional completions, recovery could be slightly increased by reducing production rates and largely increasing production times. For DWS, a combination of the top and bottom rates could be optimized for maximum recovery and minimum production time.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Wojtanowicz, A. K., Xu, H., and Bassiouni, Z. A., 1991, “Oilwell Coning Control Using Dual Completion With Tailpipe Water Sink,” Proceedings of the SPE Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, Apr. 7–9, SPE Paper No. 21654. [CrossRef]
Wojtanowicz, A. K., and Xu, H., 1992, “A New In-Situ Method to Minimize Oilwell Production Water-Cut Using Downhole Water Loop,” Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Technical Meeting of the Petroleum Society of CIM, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 7–10, Paper No. CIM 92-13.
Wojtanowicz, A. K., and Shirman, E., 1996, “An In-Situ Method for Downhole Drainage–Injection of Formation Brine in a Single Oil-Producing Well,” Deep Injection Disposal of Hazardous and Industrial Wastes, J. A.Apps, and C.-F.Tsang, eds., Academic, New York, pp. 403–420.
Shirman, E. I., 1996, “A Well Completion Design Model for Water-Free Production From Reservoirs Overlaying Aquifers,” Proceedings of 1996 SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO, Oct. 6–9, pp. 853–860.
Shirman, E. I., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 1997, “Water Cone Hysteresis and Reversal for Well Completions Using the Moving Spherical Sink Method,” Proceedings of 1997 Production Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, Mar. 9–11, SPE Paper No. 37467, pp. 611–616. [CrossRef]
Shirman, E. I., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 1997, “Water Coning Reversal Using Downhole Water Sink—Theory and Experimental Study,” Proceedings of 72nd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of SPE, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No. 38792. [CrossRef]
Shirman, E. I., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 1998, “More Oil With Less Water Using Downhole Water Sink Technology: A Feasibility Study,” Proceedings of 73rd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of SPE, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 27–30, SPE Paper No. 49052. [CrossRef]
Swisher, M. D., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 1995, “New Dual Completion Method Eliminates Bottomhole Water Coning,” Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Oct. 22–25, SPE Paper No. 30697, pp. 549–555.
Swisher, M., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 1996, “In-Situ Segregated Production of Oil and Water—A Production Method With Environmental Merit: Field Application,” SPE Adv. Technol. Ser., 4(2), pp. 51–58. [CrossRef]
Bowlin, K. R., Chea, C. K., Wheeler, S. S., and Waldo, L. A., 1997, “Field Application of In-Situ Gravity Segregation to Remediate Prior Water Coning,” Proceedings of 1997 SPE Western Regional Meeting, Long Beach, CA, June 25–27, SPE Paper No. 38296, pp. 1117–1120. [CrossRef]
Loginov, A., and Shaw, C., 1997, “Completion Design for Downhole Water and Oil Separation and Invert Coning,” Proceedings of 72nd Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of SPE, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No. 38829, pp. 70–73. [CrossRef]
Hernandez, J. C., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 2005, “Qualification of Un-recovered Reserves Due Production Process Dynamics in Water-Drive Reservoirs,” Petroleum Society 6th Canadian International Petroleum Conference 2005, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 7–9, CIPC Paper No. 2005-237. [CrossRef]
Hernandez, J. C., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 2005, “Prediction of By-passed Oil With Correlations in Side Water Drive Reservoirs,” Petroleum Society 6th Canadian International Petroleum Conference 2005, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 7–9, CIPC Paper No. 2005-196.
Hernandez, J. C., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 2006, “Assessment of Un-recovered Oil in Dipping Reservoirs From Analysis of Water Cut Development,” Petroleum Society 7th Canadian International Petroleum Conference 2006, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 13–15, CIPC Paper No. 2006-200. [CrossRef]
Kimbrell, W. C., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 2006, “Enhancing Inactive Well Recovery Potential—A Case History,” Petroleum Society 7th Canadian International Petroleum Conference 2006, Calgary, AB, Canada, June 13–15, CIPC Paper No. 2006-177. [CrossRef]
Wojtanowicz, A. K., and Armenta, M., 2004, “Assessment of Downhole Water Sink Technology for Controlling Water Inflow at Petroleum Wells,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 126(4), pp. 334–341. [CrossRef]
Byrne, W. B., Jr., and Morse, R. A., 1973, “The Effect of Various Reservoir and Well Parameters on Water Coning Performance,” Proceedings of the Third Numerical Simulation of Reservoir Performance Symposium of SPE, Houston, TX, Jan. 10–12, SPE Paper No. 4287.
Kuo, M. C. T., and DesBrisay, C. L., 1983, “A Simplified Method for Water Coning Predictions,” Proceedings of the 58th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, CA, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No. 12067. [CrossRef]
Caudle, B. H., and Silberberg, I. H., 1965, “Laboratory Models of Oil Reservoirs Produced by Natural Water Drive,” SPEJ, 5(1), pp. 25–36. [CrossRef]
Henley, D. H., Owens, W. W., and Craig, F. F., Jr., 1960, “A Scale-Model Study of Bottom-Water Drives,” J. Petrol. Eng., 13(1), pp. 90–98. [CrossRef]
Shirman, E. I., 1998, “Experimental and Theoretical Study of Dynamic Water Control in Oil Wells,” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Kurban, H., 1999, “Numerical Simulation of Downhole Water Sink Production System Performance,” M.S. thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.
Arslan, O., White, C. D., and Wojtanowicz, A. K., 2008, “Maximum Revenue for Oil Wells With Optimized Downhole Water Drainage,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 47(5), pp. 56–62.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental model schematics

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Oil recovery with DWS at various water drainage rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

An optimum DWS well production schedule (bottom/top rate ratio) gives maximum recovery

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

DWS rates cross-plot for reservoir model case-1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

DWS rates cross-plot for reservoir model case-2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental well production history shows no reduction of total water cut with DWS

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

DWS minimizes total water cut at rates below the ultimate rate (8 cc/min)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

DWS well's oil recovery for different bottom water drainage rate and constant production rate, 15.9 CMPD (100 BPD)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Recovery factor for conventional and DWS wells

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

WOC profile shows more bypassed oil (at WC = 0.98) in conventional well (a) than DWS well (b)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

DWS recovers more oil with total water cut higher than in conventional completion

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

High water production is trade-off for greater and faster recovery

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Recovery comparison for DWS and conventional completions; total water cut limit is 99%

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In