0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Modeling of Entropy Generation in Turbulent Premixed Flames for Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations: A Direct Numerical Simulation Analysis

[+] Author and Article Information
Nilanjan Chakraborty

School of Mechanical and Systems Engineering,
Newcastle University,
Claremont Road,
Newcastle-Upon-Tyne,
NE1 7RU, UK
e-mail: nilanjan.chakraborty@ncl.ac.uk

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received March 31, 2014; final manuscript received September 9, 2014; published online October 21, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Reza H. Sheikhi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 137(3), 032201 (Oct 21, 2014) (13 pages) Paper No: JERT-14-1093; doi: 10.1115/1.4028693 History: Received March 31, 2014; Revised September 09, 2014

The modeling of the mean entropy generation rate S·"'gen¯ due to combined actions of viscous dissipation, irreversible chemical reaction, thermal conduction and mass diffusion (i.e., T¯1,T¯2,T¯3, and T¯4) in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) simulations has been analyzed in detail based on a direct numerical simulation (DNS) database with a range of different values of heat release parameter τ, global Lewis number Le, and turbulent Reynolds number Ret spanning both the corrugated flamelets (CF) and thin reaction zones (TRZ) regimes of premixed turbulent combustion. It has been found that the entropy generation due to viscous dissipation T¯1 remains negligible in comparison to the other mechanisms of entropy generation (i.e., T¯2,T¯3, and T¯4) within the flame for all cases considered here. A detailed scaling analysis has been used to explain the relative contributions of , and T¯4 on the overall volumetric entropy generation rate S·"'gen¯ in turbulent premixed flames. This scaling analysis is further utilized to propose models for T¯1,T¯2,T¯3, and T¯4 in the context of RANS simulations. It has been demonstrated that the new proposed models satisfactorily predict T¯1,T¯2,T¯3, and T¯4 for all cases considered here. The accuracies of the models for T¯1,T¯2,T¯3, and T¯4 have been demonstrated to be closely linked to the modeling of dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy and scalar dissipation rates (SDRs) in turbulent premixed flames.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Puri, I. K., 1992, “Second Law Analysis of Convective Droplet Burning,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 35(10), pp. 2571–2578. [CrossRef]
Datta, A., and Som, S. K., 1999, “Thermodynamic Irreversibilities and Second Law Analysis in a Spray Combustion Process,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 142(1–6), pp. 29–54. [CrossRef]
Arpaci, V. S., and Selamet, A., 1988, “Entropy Production in Flames,” Combust. Flame, 73(3), pp. 251–259. [CrossRef]
Nishida, K., Takagi, T., and Kinoshita, S., 2002, “Analysis of Entropy Generation and Exergy Loss During Combustion,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 29, pp. 869–874. [CrossRef]
Datta, A., 2000, “Entropy Generation in a Confined Laminar Diffusion Flame,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 159(1), pp. 39–56. [CrossRef]
Briones, A. M., Mukhopadhay, A., and Aggarwal, S., 2009, “Analysis of Entropy Generation in Hydrogen-Enriched Methane—Air Propagating Triple Flames,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(2), pp. 1074–1083. [CrossRef]
Som, S. K., Agrawal, G. K., and Chakraborty, S., 2007, “Thermodynamics of Flame Impingement Heat Transfer,” J. Appl. Phys., 102(4), pp. 1–9. [CrossRef]
Som, S. K., and Datta, A., 2008, “Thermodynamic Irreversibilities and Exergy Balance in Combustion Processes,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 34(3), pp. 351–376. [CrossRef]
O'Kongo, N., and Bellan, J., 2002, “Entropy Production of Emerging Turbulent Scales in a Temporal Supercritical n-Heptane/Nitrogen Three-Dimensional Mixing Layer,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 28(1), pp. 497–502. [CrossRef]
Safari, M., Sheikhi, M. R., Janborogzi, M., and Metghalchi, M., 2010, “Entropy Transport Equation in Large Eddy Simulation for Exergy Analysis of Turbulent Combustion Systems,” Entropy, 12(3), pp. 434–444. [CrossRef]
Sheikhi, M. R. H., Safari, M., and Metghalchi, H., 2012, “Large Eddy Simulation for Local Entropy Generation Analysis of Turbulent Flows,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 134(4), p. 0416031. [CrossRef]
Farran, R., and Chakraborty, N., 2013, “A Direct Numerical Simulation Based Analysis of Entropy Generation in Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Entropy, 15(5), pp. 1540–1566. [CrossRef]
Chen, J. H., Choudhary, A., de Supinski, B., DeVries, M., Hawkes, E. R., Klasky, S., Liao, W. K., Ma, K. L., Mellor-Crummey, J., Podhorski, N., Sankaran, R., and Shende, S., 2009, “Terascale Direct Numerical Simulations of Turbulent Combustion Using S3D,” Comput. Sci. Discovery, 2(1), p. 015001. [CrossRef]
Peters, N., 2000, Turbulent Combustion, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, pp. 66–169.
Jiménez, C., Cuenot, B., Poinsot, T., and Haworth, D., 2002, “Numerical Simulation and Modeling for Lean Stratified Propane-Air Flames,” Combust. Flame, 128(1–2), pp. 1–21. [CrossRef]
Charlette, F., Meneveau, C., and Veynante, D., 2002, “A Power-Law Flame Wrinkling Model for LES of Premixed Turbulent Combustion. Part I: Nondynamic Formulation and Initial Tests,” Combust. Flame, 131(1–2), pp. 159–180. [CrossRef]
Swaminathan, N., and Bray, K. N. C., 2005, “Effect of Dilatation on Scalar Dissipation in Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Combust. Flame, 143(4), pp. 549–565. [CrossRef]
Grout, R., 2007, “An Age Extended Progress Variable for Conditioned Reaction Rates,” Phys. Fluids, 19(10), p. 105107. [CrossRef]
Han, I., and Huh, K. H., 2009, “Effects of Karlovitz Number on the Evolution of the Flame Surface Density in Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(1), pp. 1419–1425. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Lipatnikov, A. N., 2013, “Effects of Lewis Number on the Statistics of Conditional Fluid Velocity in Turbulent Premixed Combustion in the Context of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Simulations,” Phys. Fluids, 25(4), p. 045101. [CrossRef]
Wang, L., Chakraborty, N., and Zhang, J., 2013, “Streamline Segment Analysis of Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 34(1), pp. 1401–1409. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R. S., 2009, “Effects of Lewis Number on Scalar Transport in Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Phys. Fluids, 21(3), p. 035110. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R. S., 2011, “Effects of Lewis Number on Flame Surface Density Transport in Turbulent Premixed Combustion,” Combust. Flame, 158(9), pp. 1768–1787. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Swaminathan, N., 2013, “Effects of Turbulent Reynolds Number on the Scalar Dissipation Rate Transport in Turbulent Premixed Flames in the Context of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Simulations,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 185(4), pp. 676–709. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., Hartung, G., Katragadda, M., and Kaminski, C. F., 2011, “A Numerical Comparison of 2D and 3D Density-Weighted Displacement Speed Statistics and Implications for Laser Based Measurements of Flame Displacement Speed,” Combust. Flame, 158(7), pp. 1372–1390. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R. S., 2013, “Turbulent Reynolds Number Dependence of Flame Surface Density Transport in the Context of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes Simulations,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 34(1), pp. 1347–1356. [CrossRef]
Tennekes, H., and Lumley, J. L., 1972, A First Course in Turbulence, MIT, Massachusetts, MA, pp. 59–103.
Bray, K. N. C., 1980, “Turbulent Flows With Premixed Reactants,” Turbulent Reacting Flows, Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A., eds., Springer-Verlag, Heidelburg, pp. 115–183.
Kolla, H., and Swaminathan, N., 2010, “Strained Flamelets for Turbulent Premixed Flames II: Laboratory Flame Results,” Combust. Flame, 157(7), pp. 1274–1289. [CrossRef]
Sadasivuni, S., Bulat, G., Senderson, V., and Swaminathan, N., 2012, “Application of Scalar Dissipation,” ASME Paper No. GT2012-68483. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, I., and Swaminathan, N., 2013, “Simulation of Spherically Expanding Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 185(10), pp. 1509–1540. [CrossRef]
Ma, T., Gao, Y., Kempf, A. M., and Chakraborty, N., 2014, “Validation and Implementation of Algebraic LES Modelling of Scalar Dissipation Rate for Reaction Rate Closure in Turbulent Premixed Combustion,” Combust. Flame. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., Kolla, H., Sankaran, R., Hawkes, E. R., Chen, J. H., and Swaminathan, N., 2013, “Determination of Three-Dimensional Quantities Related to Scalar Dissipation Rate and Its Transport From Two-Dimensional Measurements: Direct Numerical Simulation Based Validation,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 34(1), pp. 1151–1162. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., Champion, M., Mura, A., and Swaminathan, N., 2011, “Scalar-Dissipation-Rate Approach,” Turbulent Premixed Flames, N.Swaminathan, and K. N. C.Bray, eds., Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK, pp. 76–102.
Chakraborty, N., and Cant, R. S., 2005, “Effects of Strain Rate and Curvature on Surface Density Function Transport in Turbulent Premixed Flames in the Thin Reaction Zones Regime,” Phys. Fluids, 17(6), p. 065108. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., Hawkes, E. R., Chen, J. H., and Cant, R. S., 2008, “Effects of Strain Rate and Curvature on Surface Density Function Transport in Turbulent Premixed CH4-Air and H2-Air Flames: A Comparative Study,” Combust. Flame, 154(1–2), pp. 259–280. [CrossRef]
Peters, N., Terhoeven, P., Chen, J. H., and Echekki, T., 1998, “Statistics of Flame Displacement Speeds From Computations of 2-D Unsteady Methane-Air Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 27(1), pp. 833–839. [CrossRef]
Echekki, T., and Chen, J. H., 1999, “Analysis of the Contribution of Curvature to Premixed Flame Propagation,” Combust. Flame, 118(1–2), pp. 303–311. [CrossRef]
Chakraborty, N., and Klein, M., 2008, “Influence of Lewis Number on the Surface Density Function Transport in the Thin Reaction Zones Regime for Turbulent Premixed Flames,” Phys. Fluids, 20(6), p. 065102. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Variations of T1¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2), (broken line), T2¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (solid line), T3¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (line with + symbol), T4¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (line with circles), and S·¯gen×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (line with stars) with c˜ across the flame brush for cases: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) E, (e) F, (f) G, (g) H, and (h) L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Variations of T1¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (solid line) and res(T1¯)×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (broken line) with c˜ across the flame brush along with the prediction of Eq. (8c) (model) (line with circles) for cases: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) E, (e) F, (f) G, (g) H, and (h) L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variations of T2¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (solid line) and 0.1×res(T2¯)×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (broken line) with c˜ across the flame brush along with the prediction of Eq. (10) (line with circles) and Eq. (12) (line with stars) for cases: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) E, (e) F, (f) G, (g) H, and (h) L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variations of T3¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (solid line) and res(T3¯)×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (broken line) with c˜ across the flame brush along with the prediction of Eq. (13) (Model) (line with circles) for cases: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) E, (e) F, (f) G, (g) H, and (h) L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Variations of T4¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (solid line) and res(T4¯)×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (broken line) with c˜ across the flame brush along with the prediction of Eq. (15) (model) (line with circles) for cases: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) E, (e) F, (f) G, (g) H, and (h) L

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variations of S·"' gen¯×αT/(ρ0cpSL2)=(T1¯+T2¯+T3¯+T4¯)×αT/(ρ0cpSL2) (solid line) with c˜ across the flame brush along with the predictions of Eqs. (8c), (12), (13), and (15) (model) (broken line) for cases: (a) A, (b) B, (c) C, (d) E, (e) F, (f) G, (g) H, and (h) L

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In