Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Disjoining Pressure and Gas Condensate Coupling in Gas Condensate Reservoirs

[+] Author and Article Information
Mohammad Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani

Faculty of Fouman,
College of Engineering,
University of Tehran,
P.O. Box 43515-1155,
Fouman 43516-66456, Iran
e-mail: muhammadi_mu@ut.ac.ir

Alireza Bahramian

Institute of Petroleum Engineering,
University of Tehran,
Tehran 14395-515, Iran

Peyman Pourafshary

Petroleum and Chemical
Engineering Department,
Sultan Qaboos University,
Muscat 123 Al-Khodh, Oman

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 12, 2013; final manuscript received June 10, 2014; published online June 24, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Arash Dahi Taleghani.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 136(4), 042911 (Jun 24, 2014) (6 pages) Paper No: JERT-13-1339; doi: 10.1115/1.4027851 History: Received December 12, 2013; Revised June 10, 2014

Pore-scale coupled flow of gas and condensate is believed to be the main mechanism for condensate production in low interfacial tension (IFT) gas condensate reservoirs. While coupling enhances condensate flow due to transport of condensate lenses by the gas, it dramatically reduces gas permeability by introducing capillary resistance against gas flow. In this study, a dynamic wetting approach is used to investigate the effect of viscous resistance, IFT and disjoining pressure on pore-scale coupling of gas and condensate. Disjoining pressure arises from van der Waals interactions between gas and solid through thin liquid films, e.g., condensate films on pore walls. Low values of IFT and small pore diameters, as involved in many gas condensate reservoirs, give rise to importance of disjoining pressure. Calculations show that disjoining pressure postpones gas condensate coupling to higher condensate flow fractions-from about 0.08 for vanishing disjoining effect to more than 0.16 for strong disjoining effect. Results also suggest that strong disjoining effect will result in higher gas relative permeability after coupling. Finally, the positive rate effect on gas permeability is only observed when disjoining effects are weak.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Danesh, A., Khazam, M., Henderson, G. D., Tehrani, D. H., and Peden, J. M., 1994, “As Condensate Recovery Studies,” Proceedings of DTI Improved Oil Recovery and Research Dissemination Seminar, London.
Henderson, G. D., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D. H., and Peden, J. M., 1995, “The Effect of Velocity and Interfacial Tension on the Relative Permeability of Gas Condensate Fluids in the Wellbore Region,” 8th IOR Symposium, Vienna, Austria, May 15– 17. 1995, pp. 201–208.
Henderson, G. D., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D. H., and Peden, J. M., 1996, “Measurement and Correlation of Gas Condensate Relative Permeability by the Steady-State Method,” SPE J., 1(2), pp. 191–201. [CrossRef]
Jamiolahmady, M., Danesh, A., Tehrani, D. H., and Duncan, D. B., 2000, “A Mechanistic Model of Gas-Condensate Flow in Pores,” Transp. Porous Media, 41(1), pp. 17–46. [CrossRef]
Bretherton, F. P., 1961, “The Motion of Long Bubbles in Tubes,” J. Fluid Mech., 10(2), pp. 166–188. [CrossRef]
Shahidi, F., 1997, “Modelling of Gas-Condensate Flow in Reservoir at Near Well Bore Condition,” Ph.D. thesis, Heriot–Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Blom, S. M. P., and Hagoort, J., 1998, “How to Include the Capillary Number in Gas Condensate Relative Permeability Functions?,” SPE 49268, Ann. Tech. Conf., LA.
Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M., and Ireland, S., 2009, “Gas Condensate Relative Permeability of Low Permeability Rocks: Coupling Versus Inertia,” SPE120088, Middle East oil and Gas Conference, Bahrain.
Jamiolahmady, M., Sohrabi, M., Ireland, S., and Ghahri, P., 2009, “A Generalized Correlation for Predicting Gas–Condensate Relative Permeability at Near Wellbore Conditions,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 66(3–4), pp. 98–110. [CrossRef]
Gauglitz, P. A., and Radke, C. J., 1990, “Dynamics of Liquid Film Break-Up in Constricted Capillaries,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., 134(1), pp. 14–40. [CrossRef]
Li, K., and Firoozabadi, A., 2000, “Phenomenological Modeling of Critical Condensate Saturation and Relative Permeabilities in Gas/Condensate Systems,” SPE J., 5(2), pp. 138–147. [CrossRef]
Teletzke, G. F., 1983, “Thin Liquid Films: Molecular Theory and Hydrodynamic Implications,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Deryagin, B. V., and Kussakov, M., 1939, “Anomalous Properties of Thin Polymolecular Films,” Acta Physicochem. URSS, 10, pp. 25–44.
Mohammadi-Khanaposhtani, M., Bahramian, A., Pourafshary, P., Aminshahidy, B., and Fazelabdolabadi, B., 2012, “Effect of Disjoining Pressure on the Onset of Condensate Blockage in Gas Condensate Reservoirs,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 9, pp. 160–165.
Ratulowski, J., and Chang, H. C., 1989, “Transport of Gas Bubbles in Capillaries,” Phys. Fluids A, 1(10), pp. 1642–1655. [CrossRef]
Hammond, P. S., 1983, “Nonlinear Adjustment of a Thin Annular Film of Viscous Fluid Surrounding a Thread of Another Within a Circular Cylindrical Pipe,” J. Fluid Mech., 137, pp. 363–384. [CrossRef]
Griffith, P., and Lee, K. S., 1964, “The Stability of an Annulus of Liquid in a Tube,” ASME, J. Fluids Eng., 86(4), pp. 666–668. [CrossRef]
Gumerman, R. J., and Homsy, G. M., 1975, “The Stability of Radially Bounded Thin Films,” Chem. Eng. Commun., 2(1), pp. 27–36. [CrossRef]
Aul, R. W., and Olbright, W. L., 1990, “Stability of a Thin Annular Film in Pressure-Driven, Low-Reynolds-Number Flow Through a Capillary,” J. Fluid Mech., 215, pp. 585–599. [CrossRef]
Kawahara, A., Chung, P. M.-Y., and Kawaji, M., 2002, “Investigation of Two-Phase Flow Pattern, Void Fraction and Pressure Drop in a Microchannel,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 28(9), pp. 1411–1435. [CrossRef]
Lifshitz, E. M., 1956, “The Theory of Molecular Attractive Force Between Solids,” Sov. Phys. JETP, 2, pp. 73–83.
Shi, C., and Horne, R. N., 2008, “Improved Recovery in Gas Condensate Reservoirs Considering Compositional Variations,” SPE 115786 Technical Conference and Exhibition Held in Denver, CO.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Disturbance of the film interface by surface waves inside a capillary tube

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Transition of annular film flow to slug flow by formation of liquid lens

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of an axisymmetric bubble inside a microcapillary tube, Yi is the height of interface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Arc length-angle coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Condensate flow fraction at the onset of lens formation, i.e., onset of coupling

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of initial gas pressure drop with coupling pressure drop at the onset of lens formation (μg = 0.2μl)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Calculated values of (a) gas and (b) condensate relative permeability for a bundle of cylindrical capillary tubes (μg = 0.2μl)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In