0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation and Boost Pressure on Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition Engine at High Load Operating Conditions

[+] Author and Article Information
Yifeng Wu

Engine Research Center,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin,
1500 Engineering Drive,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: yifeng.wu@uwalumni.com

Rolf D. Reitz

ASME Fellow
Engine Research Center,
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin,
Room 1018A Engineering Research Building,
1500 Engineering Drive,
Madison, WI 53706
e-mail: reitz@engr.wisc.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Internal Combustion Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 21, 2015; final manuscript received February 11, 2015; published online March 5, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Stephen A. Ciatti.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 137(3), 032210 (May 01, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1028; doi: 10.1115/1.4029866 History: Received January 21, 2015; Revised February 11, 2015; Online March 05, 2015

Reactivity controlled compression ignition (RCCI) at engine high load operating conditions is investigated in this study. The effects of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) and boost pressure on RCCI combustion were studied by using a multidimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code. The model was first compared with a previous CFD model, which has been validated against steady-state experimental data of gasoline–diesel RCCI in a multicylinder light duty engine. An RCCI piston with a compression ratio of 15:1 was then proposed to improve the combustion and emissions at high load. The simulation results showed that 18 bar indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) could be achieved with gasoline–diesel RCCI at an EGR rate of 35% and equivalence ratio of 0.96, while the peak pressure rise rate (PPRR) and engine combustion efficiency could both be controlled at reasonable levels. Simulations using both early and late direct-injection (DI) of diesel fuel showed that RCCI combustion at high load is very sensitive to variations of the EGR amount. Higher IMEP is obtained by using early diesel injection, and it is less sensitive to EGR variation compared to late diesel injection. Reduced unburned hydrocarbon (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), soot and slightly more nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions were seen for early diesel injection. HC, CO, and soot emissions were found to be more sensitive to EGR variation at late diesel injection timings. However, there was little difference in terms of peak pressure (PP), efficiencies, PPRR, and phasing under varying EGR rates. The effect of boost pressure on RCCI at high load operating conditions was also studied at different EGR rates. It was found that combustion and emissions were improved, and the sensitivity of the combustion and emission to EGR was reduced with higher boost pressures. In addition, cases with similar combustion phasing and reasonable PPRR were analyzed by using an experimentally validated GT-Power model. The results indicated that although higher IMEP was generated at higher boost pressures, the brake mean effective pressure (BMEP) was similar compared to that obtained with lower boost pressures due to higher pumping losses.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Comparison of the kiva-SpeedCHEM and kiva-CHEMKIN simulation results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Sketch of stock and RCCI pistons

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Simulation results for DI SOI sweep

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Pressure and AHRR history at DI SOI of 48 CAD BTDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of EGR on RCCI high load operation at DI SOI of 48 and 8 CAD BTDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Effect of IVC pressure and EGR on RCCI high load operation at DI DOI of 48 CAD BTDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of kiva and GT-Power-simulated pressure traces

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

GT-Power generated results for selected cases (PMEP and FMEP)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In