Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Induced Stress and Interaction of Fractures During Hydraulic Fracturing in Shale Formation

[+] Author and Article Information
Desheng Zhou

College of Petroleum Engineering,
Xi'an Shiyou University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
e-mail: desheng@xsyu.edu.cn

Peng Zheng

College of Petroleum Engineering,
Xi'an Shiyou University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
e-mail: zgpgyuxg@163.com

Jiao Peng

College of Petroleum Engineering,
Xi'an Shiyou University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
e-mail: pj_petrochina@126.com

Pei He

College of Petroleum Engineering,
Xi'an Shiyou University,
Xi'an, Shaanxi 710065, China
e-mail: happily96@163.com

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received February 12, 2015; final manuscript received May 20, 2015; published online June 30, 2015. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 137(6), 062902 (Nov 01, 2015) (6 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1059; doi: 10.1115/1.4030832 History: Received February 12, 2015; Revised May 20, 2015; Online June 30, 2015

Creating complex fracture network by hydraulic fracturing operation in unconventional reservoir development is the key factor of effective exploitation. The mechanism of creating a fracture network is not clear up to today. Conventional hydraulic fracturing theory is based on tensile failure of a rock, and a hydraulic fracture is widely accepted as propagating along the direction of in situ maximum horizontal principal stress in the industry. Based on rock elastic mechanics and fracture mechanics, considering combined tensile and shear failures, the maximum circumferential strain criterion and boundary element method (BEM), the paper studies the induced stress and its variation during a fracture propagation, the interaction between two or more hydraulic fractures, and the interaction between a hydraulic fracture and a natural crack. The paper shows that a propagating fracture will produce induced stresses on surrounding rock and form a stress shadow. Instead of propagation along the direction of maximum horizontal principal stress as a single fracture, the outside two fractures of two or more hydraulic fractures are exclusive and turning away from each other. A natural crack may be awaked and extend at its both tips by a propagating hydraulic fracture before their intersection, and the hydraulic fracture may deflect toward the natural crack. The interaction between a hydraulic fracture and a natural crack depends on the transverse distance between them and the initial length of the crack. The shorter the transverse distance and the longer the crack length are, the higher the possibility of the crack to be awaked is. The research results are helpful in understanding complex fracture network and may be used in determining hydraulic fracture places to create a complex fracture network.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Rahman, M. M., and Rahman, M. K., 2012, “Optimizing Hydraulic Fracture to Manage Sand Production by Predicting Critical Drawdown Pressure in Gas Well,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 134(1), p. 013101. [CrossRef]
Tiab, D., Lu, J., and Nguyen, H., 2010, “Evaluation of Fracture Asymmetry of Finite-Conductivity Fractured Wells,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 132(1), p. 012901. [CrossRef]
Fisher, M. K., Davidson, B. M., Goodwin, A. K., Fielder, E. O., Buckler, W. S., and Steinsberger, N. P., 2002, “Integrating Fracture Mapping Technologies to Optimize Stimulation in the Barnett Shale,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Sept. 29–Oct. 2, SPE Paper No. 77411. [CrossRef]
Fisher, M. K., Heinze, J. R., Harris, C. D., Davidson, B. M., Wright, C. A., and Dunn, K. P., 2005, “Optimizing Horizontal Completion Techniques in the Barnett Shale Using Microseismic Fracture Mapping,” J. Pet. Technol., 57(3), pp. 41–42. [CrossRef]
Maxwell, S. C., Urbancik, T. I., Steinsberger, N. P., and Zinno, R., 2002, “Microseismic Imaging of Hydraulic Fracture Complexity in the Barnett Shale,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Sept. 29–Oct. 2, SPE Paper No. 774440.
Osholake, T., Wang, J. Y., and Ertekin, T., 2013, “Factors Affecting Hydraulically Fractured Well Performance in The Marcellus Shale Gas Reservoirs,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 135(1), p. 013402. [CrossRef]
Warpinski, N. R., Mayerhofer, M. J., Vincent, M. C., Cipolla, C. L., and Lolon, E. P., 2009, “Stimulating Unconventional Reservoirs: Maximizing Network Growth While Optimizing Fracture Conductivity,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 48(10), pp. 39–51. [CrossRef]
Kim, G. H., and Wang, J. Y., 2014, “Interpretation of Hydraulic Fracturing Pressure in Tight Gas Formations,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 136(3), p. 032903. [CrossRef]
Wood, D. B., and Junkin, G., 1970, “Stresses and Displacements Around Hydraulically Fractured Well,” Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Houston, TX, Oct. 4–7, SPE Paper No. 3030.
Roussel, N., and Sharma, M., 2011, “Optimizing Fracture Spacing and Sequencing in Horizontal Well Fracturing,” SPE Prod. Oper., 26(2), pp. 173–184. [CrossRef]
Warpinski, N. R., Wolhart, S. L., and Wright, C. A., 2004, “Analysis and Prediction of Microseismicity Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing,” SPE J., 9(1), pp. 24–33. [CrossRef]
Smith, R. A., and Cooper, J. F., 1989, “A Finite Element Model for the Shape Development of Irregular Planar Cracks,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 36(4), pp. 315–326. [CrossRef]
Sumi, Y., Yang, C., and Hayashi, S., 1996, “Morphological Aspects of Fatigue Crack Propagation Part I—Computational Procedure,” Int. J. Fract., 82(3), pp. 205–220. [CrossRef]
Li, G., Allison, D., and Soliman, M. Y., 2011, “Geomechanical Study of the Multistage Fracturing Process for Horizontal Wells,” 45th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, CA, Paper No. ARMA 11-121.
Hofmann, H., Babadagli, T., and Zimmermann, G., 2014, “Numerical Simulation of Complex Fracture Network Development by Hydraulic Fracturing in Naturally Fractured Ultratight Formations,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 136(4), p. 042907. [CrossRef]
Sneddon, I. N., and Elliott, H. A., 1946, “The Opening of a Griffith Crack Under Internal Pressure,” Q. Appl. Math., 4(3), pp. 262–267.
Sneddon, I. N., 1946, “The Distribution of Stress in the Neighborhood of a Crack in an Elastic Solid,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 187(1009), pp. 229–260. [CrossRef]
Warpinski, N. R., and Branagan, P. T., 1989, “Altered-Stress Fracturing,” J. Pet. Technol., 41(9), pp. 990–991. [CrossRef]
Cheng, Y., 2012, “Mechanical Interaction of Multiple Fractures-Exploring Impacts of the Selection of the Spacing/Number of Perforation Clusters on Horizontal Shale-Gas Wells,” SPE J., 17(04), pp. 992–1001. [CrossRef]
Daneshy, A. A., 2003, “Off-Balance Growth: A New Concept in Hydraulic Fracturing,” J. Pet. Technol., 55(04), pp. 78–85. [CrossRef]
Erdogan, F., and Sih, G. C., 1963, “On the Crack Extension in Plates Under Plane Loading and Transverse Shear,” J. Basic Eng., 85(4), pp. 519–525. [CrossRef]
Xue, W., 2010, “Numerical Investigation of Interaction Between Hydraulic Fractures and Natural Fractures,” Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of induced stress field

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Stress around a fracture tip

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison with published simulation results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The layout of transverse distance d and initial length ℓ

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Fracture stress shadows by induced stresses: (a) σx and (b) τxy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Fracture propagation directions of multiple hydraulic fractures: (a) one fracture, (b) two fractures, and (c) three fractures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Interaction between a natural crack and a hydraulic fracture

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Critical length and transverse distance of awaking a natural crack



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In