Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Numerical Study on Effects of Drilling Mud Rheological Properties on the Transport of Drilling Cuttings

[+] Author and Article Information
E. GhasemiKafrudi

Computational Fluid Dynamics
Research Laboratory,
School of Chemical Engineering,
Iran University of Science
and Technology,
Tehran 16846, Iran

S. H. Hashemabadi

Associate Professor
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Research Laboratory,
School of Chemical Engineering,
Iran University of Science
and Technology,
Tehran 16846, Iran
e-mail: hashemabadi@iust.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 16, 2015; final manuscript received May 23, 2015; published online September 16, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Christopher J. Wajnikonis.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(1), 012902 (Sep 16, 2015) (8 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1019; doi: 10.1115/1.4031450 History: Received January 16, 2015; Revised May 23, 2015

Inaccurate prediction of the required pressures can lead to a number of costly drilling problems. In this study, the hydrodynamics of mud-cuttings were numerically studied using the Mixture Model. To this end, an in-house code was developed to calculate the velocity and pressure fields. The mud velocity profile using of Herschel–Bulkley model and solid phase volume fraction were locally calculated; moreover, pressure drop through the annulus was taken into account. The effects of velocity, mud properties, and solid phase volume fraction on pressure drop were discussed and a new correlation was proposed for calculating friction factor based on corresponding parameters.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bourgoyne, A. T. , Millheim, K. K. , Chenevert, M. E. , and Young, F. S. , 2002, Applied Drilling Engineering, SPE Foundation.
Sorgun, M. , 2013, “ Simple Correlations and Analysis of Cuttings Transport With Newtonian and Non-Newtonian Fluids in Horizontal and Deviated Wells,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 135(3), p. 032903.
Ozbayoglu, M. E. , and Sorgun, M. , 2010, “ Frictional Pressure Loss Estimation of Non-Newtonian Fluids Realistic Annulus With Pipe Rotation,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 49(12), pp. 57–64. [CrossRef]
Sorgun, M. , Ozbayoglu, M. E. , and Aydin, I. , 2010, “ Modeling and Experimental Study of Newtonian Fluid Flow in Annulus,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 132(3), p. 033102. [CrossRef]
Erge, O. , Ozbayoglu, M. E. , Miska, S. Z. , Yu, M. , Takach, N. , Saasen, A. , and May, R. , 2014, “ Effect of Drillstring Deflection and Rotary Speed on Annular Frictional Pressure Losses,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 136(4), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
Founargiotakis, K. , Kelessidis, V. C. , and Maglione, R. , 2008, “ Laminar, Transitional and Turbulent Flow of Herschel–Bulkley Fluids in Concentric Annulus,” Can. J. Chem. Eng., 86(4), pp. 676–683. [CrossRef]
Sorgun, M. , Aydin, I. , Schubert, J. J. , and Ozbayoglu, M. E. , 2010, “ Modeling of Newtonian Fluids in Annular Geometries With Inner Pipe Rotation,” 3rd Joint US-European Fluids Engineering Summer Meeting Colocated With 8th International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels.
Wei, X. , Miska, S. Z. , Takash, N. E. , Bern, P. , and Kenny, P. , 1998, “ The Effect of Drillpipe Rotation on Annular Frictional Pressure Loss,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 120(1), pp. 61–66. [CrossRef]
Wang, H. , Su, Y. , Bai, Y. , Gao, Z. , and Zhang, F. , 2000, “ Experimental Study of Slimhole Annular Pressure Loss and Its Field Applications,” IADC/SPE Annular Technical Conference, New Orleans, LA, Feb. 23–25, Paper No. SPE-59265-MS.
Ozbelge, T. A. , and Beyaz, A. , 2001, “ Dilute Solid–Liquid Upward Flows Through a Vertical Annulus in a Closed Loop System,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 27(4), pp. 737–752. [CrossRef]
Escudier, M. P. , Oliveira, P. J. , and Pinho, F. T. , 2002, “ Fully Developed Laminar Flow of Purely Viscous Non-Newtonian Liquids Through Annuli, Including the Effects of Eccentricity and Inner-Cylinder Rotation,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 23(1), pp. 52–73. [CrossRef]
Zhou, Y. , and Shah, S. N. , 2004, “ Rheological Properties and Frictional Pressure Loss of Drilling, Completion, and Stimulation Fluids in Coiled Tubing,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 126(2), pp. 153–161. [CrossRef]
Woo, N. , Kim, Y. , and Hwang, Y. , 2006, “ Experimental Study on the Helical Flow in a Concentric Annulus With Rotating Inner Cylinder,” ASME J. Fluids Eng., 128(1), pp. 113–117. [CrossRef]
Kelessidis, V . C. , Maglione, R. , Tsamantaki, C. , and Aspirtakis, Y. , 2006, “ Optimal Determination of Rheological Parameters for Herschel–Bulkley Drilling Fluids and Impact on Pressure Drop, Velocity Profiles and Penetration Rates During Drilling,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 53(3-4), pp. 203–224. [CrossRef]
Pereira, F. A. R. , Barrozo, M. A. S. , and Ataide, C. H. , 2007, “ CFD Predictions of Drilling Fluid Velocity and Pressure Profiles in Laminar Helical Flow,” Braz. J. Chem. Eng., 24(4), pp. 587–595. [CrossRef]
Escudier, M. P. , Oliveira, P. J. , Pinho, F. T. , and Smith, S. , 2002, “ Fully Developed Laminar Flow of Non-Newtonian Liquids Through Annuli: Comparison of Numerical Calculations With Experiments,” Exp. Fluids, 33(1), pp. 101–111. [CrossRef]
Ahmed, R. , and Miska, S. , 2008, “ Experimental Study and Modeling of Yield Power-Law Fluid Flow in Annuli With Drillpipe Rotation,” SPE Drilling Conference, Orlando, FL.
Zhi-ming, W. , Xiao-le, G. , Ming, L. , and Yu-kui, H. , 2009, “ Effect of Drillpipe Rotation on Borehole Cleaning for Extended Reach Well,” J. Hydrodyn., 21(3), pp. 366–372. [CrossRef]
Han, S. M. , Hwang, Y.-K. , Woo, N.-S. , and Kim, Y. J. , 2010, “ Solid–Liquid Hydrodynamics in a Slim Hole Drilling Annulus,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 70(3), pp. 308–319. [CrossRef]
Gumati, A. , and Takahshi, H. , 2011, “ Experimental Study and Modeling of Pressure Loss for Foam-Cuttings Mixture Flow in Horizontal Pipe,” J. Hydrodyn., 23(4), pp. 431–438. [CrossRef]
Haciislamoglu, M. , and Langlinais, J. , 1991, “ Effect of Pipe Eccentricity on Surge Pressures,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 113(3), pp. 157–160. [CrossRef]
Hajidavalloo, E. , Sadeghi-Behbahani-Zadeh, M. , and Shekari, Y. , 2013, “ Simulation of Gas–Solid Two-Phase Flow in the Annulus of Drilling Well,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 91(3), pp. 477–484. [CrossRef]
Sorgun, M. , Osgouei, R. E. , Ozbayoglu, M. E. , and Ozbayoglu, A. M. , 2011, “ Gas–Liquid Flow Through Horizontal Eccentric Annuli: CFD and Experiments Compared,” ASME Paper No. AJK2011-2400.
Njobuenwu, D. O. , and Wobo, C. A. , 2007, “ Effect of Drilled Solids on Drilling Rate and Performance,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 55(3-4), pp. 271–276. [CrossRef]
Versteeg, H. K. , and Malalasekera, W. , 2007, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics, The Finite Volume Method, 2nd ed., Pearson Education Limited, New York.
Tu, J. , Heng Yeoh, G. , and Liu, C. , 2013, Computational Fluid Dynamics (A Practical Approach), 2nd ed., Elsevier, New York.
Pereira, F. A. R. , Ataide, C. H. , and Barrozo, M. A. S. , 2010, “ CFD Approach Using a Discrete Phase Model for Annular Flow Analysis,” Latin Am. Appl. Res., 40(1), pp. 53–60.
Heng Yeoh, G. , and Tu, J. , 2009, Computational Techniques for Multiphase Flows, Elsevier, New York.
Chhabra, R. P. , and Richardson, J. F. , 2008, “Non Newtonain flow and Applied Rheology,” Elsevier, New York.
Firouzi, M. , and Hashemabadi, S. H. , 2008, “ Analytical Solution for Newtonian–Bingham Plastic Two-Phase Pressure Driven Stratified Flow Through the Circular Ducts,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 35(5), pp. 666–673. [CrossRef]
Bird, R. B. , Stewart, W. E. , and Lightfoot, E. N. , 2002, Transport Phenomena, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Mitsoulis, E. , 2007, “ Annular Extrudate Swell of Pseudoplastic and Viscoplastic Fluids,” Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech., 141(2-3), pp. 138–147. [CrossRef]
Ozbayoglu, M. E. , Saasen, A. , Sorgun, M. , and Svanes, K. , 2010, “ Critical Fluid Velocities for Removing Cuttings Bed Inside Horizontal and Deviated Wells,” Pet. Sci. Technol., 28(6), pp. 594–602. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) The boundary conditions, (b) forces on a moving particle in drilling fluid, (c) a control volume to calculate the velocity and pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison the numerical simulation and experimental data [19] of solid particles average velocity versus liquid average velocity (water as carrier fluid) in vertical (0 deg) and inclined annulus (20 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of numerical simulation and experimental data [19] of (a) solid particles' average velocity (b) pressure drop versus liquid average velocity (0.4% CMC solution as carrier fluid) in vertical (0 deg) and inclined annulus (20 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Drilling mud and cutting velocity profiles with different sizes, solid loading 5%, with D.F-10 fluid (Table 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Cutting volume fraction with different sizes on developed flow region with D.F-10 fluid (Table 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of two different carrying ratios for different cutting sizes (0.1, 0.4, and 1 cm) and drilling mud (D.F-1 and D.F-10, Table 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Pressure drop versus average velocity for five different fluid types (Table 1) (ρp  = 2550 kg/m3, αp=%3)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pressure gradient versus input velocity in different solid volume fraction (αp=0–15% with D.F-1 (Table 2)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pressure gradient versus input velocity and increased drilling string rotation velocity. With D.F-1 fluid αp=8%.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the friction factor predicted by numerical solution and new correlation (Eq. (17))




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In