Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Effect on Fracture Pressure by Adding Iron-Based and Calcium-Based Nanoparticles to a Nonaqueous Drilling Fluid for Permeable Formations

[+] Author and Article Information
Oscar Contreras

500, 5th Avenue South West,
Calgary, AB T2P 0L7, Canada
e-mail: ocontreras@chevron.com

Mortadha Alsaba

Missouri University of Science and Technology,
1006 Kingshighway,
Rolla, MO 65409
e-mail: mtavm5@mst.edu

Geir Hareland

Oklahoma State University,
423 Engineering North,
Stillwater, OK 74078-5021
e-mail: geir.hareland@okstate.edu

Maen Husein

University of Calgary,
2500 University Dr. NW,
Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
e-mail: mhusein@ucalgary.ca

Runar Nygaard

Missouri University of Science and Technology,
129 McNutt Hall,
1400 North Bishop Avenue,
Rolla, MO 65409
e-mail: nygaardr@mst.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 18, 2015; final manuscript received January 6, 2016; published online February 5, 2016. Assoc. Editor: S. O. Bade Shrestha.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(3), 032906 (Feb 05, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1189; doi: 10.1115/1.4032542 History: Received May 18, 2015; Revised January 06, 2016

This paper presents a comprehensive experimental evaluation to investigate the effects of adding iron-based and calcium-based nanoparticles (NPs) to nonaqueous drilling fluids (NAFs) as a fluid loss additive and for wellbore strengthening applications in permeable formations. API standard high-pressure-high-temperature (HPHT) filter press in conjunction with ceramic disks is used to quantify fluid loss reduction. Hydraulic fracturing experiments are carried out to measure fracturing and re-opening pressures. A significant enhancement in both filtration and strengthening was achieved by means of in situ prepared NPs. Our results demonstrate that filtration reduction is essential for successful wellbore strengthening; however, excessive reduction could affect the strengthening negatively.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of the hydraulic fracturing apparatus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

SEM/EDX images of the CaNPs formed seal along the fracture plane cross section

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Mud filtration using (a) only conventional LCM and (b) NPs and conventional LCM (Contreras 2014)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The effect of iron-based NPs on filtration characteristics and fracturing pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The effect of calcium-based NPs on filtration characteristics and fracturing pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Hydraulic fracturing P versus T for control sample, iron-based NPs (FeNP), and calcium-based NPs (CaNP) blends

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The effect of NPs on both the fracturing pressure and re-opening pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Core sample after hydraulic fracturing for the control sample (left), FeNP (middle), and CaNP (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Top view of the fractured core and (b) cross section of the fracture planes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Digital microscopy image of the fracture at the wellbore




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In