0
Technical Brief

An Experimental Study of the Collection of Fog Droplets Using a Mesh Fabric: Possible Application to Cooling Towers

[+] Author and Article Information
D. S. Sontag, J. R. Saylor

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Clemson University,
Clemson, SC 29634-0921

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 23, 2015; final manuscript received October 10, 2015; published online December 1, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Mohamed A. Habib.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(2), 024501 (Dec 01, 2015) (4 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1277; doi: 10.1115/1.4031969 History: Received July 23, 2015; Revised October 10, 2015

An experimental study is presented of the ability of fine meshes to remove fog drops from an air flow. Specifically, the collection efficiency (CE) was measured for fog drops passing through mesh fabrics. Meshes composed of cotton, nylon, and Teflon were investigated, and the effect of the material as well as mesh porosity was determined. Collection efficiencies ranging from 5% to 50% were obtained. The ultimate goal of this work is to employ such meshes in a parachute configuration above power plant cooling towers, so that condensed fog may be collected and returned to the cooling loop. It is shown that the drop diameters and velocities investigated here are similar to those observed above cooling towers.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Humid air generator

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sample grayscale images of nylon, cotton, and Teflon meshes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Thresholded versions of the grayscale images presented in Fig. 3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Drop size distribution for fog drops generated in the drop generation container

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Averaged CE versus ϕ for each material tested

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Average CE versus pressure drop across the mesh

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

CE scaled to pressure drop versus pressure drop, presented on log–log coordinates

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In