0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Dual-Location Fuel Injection Effects on Emissions and NO*/OH* Chemiluminescence in a High Intensity Combustor

[+] Author and Article Information
Ahmed O. Said

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
2181 Glenn L. Martin Hall, Building #88,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: aosaid@umd.edu

Ahmed E. E. Khalil

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
2181 Glenn L. Martin Hall, Building #88,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: aekhalil@umd.edu

Ashwani K. Gupta

Distinguished University Professor
Fellow ASME, AIAA, and SAE
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Maryland,
2159 Glenn L. Martin Hall, Building #88,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: akgupta@umd.edu

1Corressponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 18, 2015; final manuscript received March 1, 2016; published online March 24, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Yiannis Levendis.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(4), 042208 (Mar 24, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1257; doi: 10.1115/1.4032939 History: Received July 18, 2015; Revised March 01, 2016

Colorless distributed combustion (CDC) has shown to provide ultra-low emissions of NO, CO, unburned hydrocarbons, and soot, with stable combustion without using any flame stabilizer. The benefits of CDC also include uniform thermal field in the entire combustion space and low combustion noise. One of the critical aspects in distributed combustion is fuel mixture preparation prior to mixture ignition. In an effort to improve fuel mixing and distribution, several schemes have been explored that includes premixed, nonpremixed, and partially premixed. In this paper, the effect of dual-location fuel injection is examined as opposed to single fuel injection into the combustor. Fuel distribution between different injection points was varied with the focus on reaction distribution and pollutants emission. The investigations were performed at different equivalence ratios (0.6–0.8), and the fuel distribution in each case was varied while maintaining constant overall thermal load. The results obtained with multi-injection of fuel using a model combustor showed lower emissions as compared to single injection of fuel using methane as the fuel under favorable fuel distribution condition. The NO emission from double injection as compared to single injection showed a reduction of 28%, 24%, and 13% at equivalence ratio of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8, respectively. This is attributed to enhanced mixture preparation prior to the mixture ignition. OH* chemiluminescence intensity distribution within the combustor showed that under favorable fuel injection condition, the reaction zone shifted downstream, allowing for longer fuel mixing time prior to ignition. This longer mixing time resulted in better mixture preparation and lower emissions. The OH* chemiluminescence signals also revealed enhanced OH* distribution with fuel introduced through two injectors.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Arghode, V. K. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2010, “ Effect of Flowfield for Colorless Distributed Combustion (CDC) for Gas Turbine Combustion,” Appl. Energy, 87(5), pp. 1631–1640. [CrossRef]
Arghode, V. K. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2013, “ Role of Thermal Intensity on Operational Characteristics of Ultra-Low Emission Colorless Distributed Combustion,” Appl. Energy, 111, pp. 930–956. [CrossRef]
Khalil, A. E. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2011, “ Swirling Distributed Combustion For Clean Energy Conversion in Gas Turbine Applications,” Appl. Energy, 88(11), pp. 3685–3693. [CrossRef]
Khalil, A. E. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2011, “ Distributed Swirl Combustion for Gas Turbine Application,” Appl. Energy, 88(12), pp. 4898–4907. [CrossRef]
Tsuji, H. , Gupta, A. K. , Hasegawa, T. , Katsuki, M. , Kishimoto, K. , and Morita, M. , 2003, High Temperature Air Combustion: From Energy Conservation to Pollution Reduction, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Gupta, A. K. , Lilley, D. G. , and Syred, N. , 1984, Swirl Flows, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells, UK.
Huang, Y. , 2008, “ Combustion Dynamics of Swirl-Stabilized Lean Premixed Flames in an Acoustically Driven Environment,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA.
Roux, S. , Lartigue, G. , Poinsot, T. , Meier, U. , and Berat, C. , 2005, “ Studies of Mean and Unsteady Flow in a Swirled Combustor Using Experiments, Acoustic Analysis, and Large Eddy Simulations,” Combust. Flame, 141(1–2), pp. 40–54. [CrossRef]
Lefebvre, A. H. , 1998, Gas Turbine Combustion, 2nd ed., Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
Khalil, A. E. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2012, “ Mixture Preparation Effects on Distributed Combustion for Gas Turbine Applications,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 134(3), p. 032201. [CrossRef]
Arghode, V. K. , Khalil, A. E. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2012, “ Fuel Dilution and Liquid Fuel Operational Effects on Ultra-High Thermal Intensity Distributed Combustor,” Appl. Energy, 95, pp. 132–138. [CrossRef]
Khalil, A. E. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2015, “ Towards Ultra-Low Emission Distributed Combustion With Fuel Air Dilution,” Appl. Energy, 148, pp. 187–195. [CrossRef]
Khalil, A. E. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2013, “ Dual Injection Distributed Combustion for Gas Turbine Application,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 136(1), p. 011601. [CrossRef]
Leong, M. Y. , Samuelsen, G. S. , and Holdeman, J. D. , 1997, “ Mixing of Pure Air Jets With a Reacting Fuel-Rich Crossflow,” NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. NASA-TM-107430.
Turns, S. R. , 2000, An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
Stone, R. , Clarke, A. , and Beckwith, P. , 1998, “ Correlations for the Laminar-Burning Velocity of Methane/Diluent/Air Mixtures Obtained in Free-Fall Experiments,” Combust. Flame, 114(3–4), pp. 546–555. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

High intensity CDC combustor with two fuel injections

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cross section of the cylindrical combustor (nonpremixed with two fuel injection locations)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

NO concentration at different fractions of fuel injected to one injector (FIR)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

CO emission at different FIR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

A comparison of OH* chemiluminescence intensity distribution at different FIR (100–0%) at equivalence ratio (Ø) of (0.6, 0.7, and 0.8)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Detailed reaction signature (locus) for equivalence ration of (Ø = 0.6)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Mean signal intensity relative to maximum intensity at different equivalence ratios

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of NO* chemiluminescence intensity distribution at different FIR (100–0%) for Ø = (0.6, 0.7, and 0.8)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In