0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Modeling of Internal and Near-Nozzle Flow for a Gasoline Direct Injection Fuel Injector

[+] Author and Article Information
Kaushik Saha

Energy Systems Division,
Argonne National Laboratory,
Lemont, IL 60439
e-mail: ksaha@anl.gov

Sibendu Som

Energy Systems Division,
Argonne National Laboratory,
Lemont, IL 60439
e-mail: ssom@anl.gov

Michele Battistoni

Department of Engineering,
University of Perugia,
Perugia 106123, Italy
e-mail: michele.battistoni@unipg.it

Yanheng Li

Convergent Science, Inc.,
Madison, WI 53719
e-mail: yanheng.li@convergecfd.com

Shaoping Quan

Convergent Science, Inc.,
Madison, WI 53719
e-mail: shaoping.quan@convergecfd.com

Peter Kelly Senecal

Convergent Science, Inc.,
Madison, WI 53719
e-mail: senecal@convergecfd.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Internal Combustion Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 14, 2016; final manuscript received March 3, 2016; published online April 5, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Avinash Kumar Agarwal. The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States government purposes.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(5), 052208 (Apr 05, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1023; doi: 10.1115/1.4032979 History: Received January 14, 2016; Revised March 03, 2016

A numerical study of two-phase flow inside the nozzle holes and the issuing spray jets for a multihole direct injection gasoline injector has been presented in this work. The injector geometry is representative of the Spray G nozzle, an eight-hole counterbore injector, from the engine combustion network (ECN). Simulations have been carried out for a fixed needle lift. The effects of turbulence, compressibility, and noncondensable gases have been considered in this work. Standard k–ε turbulence model has been used to model the turbulence. Homogeneous relaxation model (HRM) coupled with volume of fluid (VOF) approach has been utilized to capture the phase-change phenomena inside and outside the injector nozzle. Three different boundary conditions for the outlet domain have been imposed to examine nonflashing and evaporative, nonflashing and nonevaporative, and flashing conditions. Noticeable hole-to-hole variations have been observed in terms of mass flow rates for all the holes under all the operating conditions considered in this study. Inside the nozzle holes mild cavitationlike and in the near-nozzle region flash-boiling phenomena have been predicted when liquid fuel is subjected to superheated ambiance. Under favorable conditions, considerable flashing has been observed in the near-nozzle regions. An enormous volume is occupied by the gasoline vapor, formed by the flash boiling of superheated liquid fuel. Large outlet domain connecting the exits of the holes and the pressure outlet boundary appeared to be necessary leading to substantial computational cost. Volume-averaging instead of mass-averaging is observed to be more effective, especially for finer mesh resolutions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Weber, D. , and Leick, P. , 2014, “ Structure and Velocity Field of Individual Plumes of Flashing Gasoline Direct Injection Sprays,” 26th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS), Bremen, Germany, Sept. 8–10.
Neroorkar, K. D. , 2011, “ Modeling of Flash Boiling Flows in Injectors With Gasoline-Ethanol Fuel Blends,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA.
Vanderwege, B. A. , and Hochgreb, S. , 1998, “ The Effect of Fuel Volatility on Sprays From High-Pressure Swirl Injectors,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 27(2), pp. 1865–1871. [CrossRef]
Zeng, W. , Xu, M. , Zhang, G. , Zhang, Y. , and Cleary, D. J. , 2012, “ Atomization and Vaporization for Flash-Boiling Multi-Hole Sprays With Alcohol Fuels,” Fuel, 95, pp. 287–297. [CrossRef]
Xu, M. , Zhang, Y. , Zeng, W. , Zhang, G. , and Zhang, M. , 2013, “ Flash Boiling: Easy and Better Way to Generate Ideal Sprays Than the High Injection Pressure,” SAE Paper No. 2013-01-1614.
Blinkov, V. N. , Jones, O. C. , and Nigmatulin, B. I. , 1993, “ Nucleation and Flashing in Nozzles—2. Comparison With Experiments Using a Five-Equation Model for Vapor Void Development,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 19(6), pp. 965–986. [CrossRef]
Chang, D. L. , and Lee, C. F. , 2002, “ Preliminary Computational Studies of Flash Boiling for Fuel Injectors in Gasoline Direct Injection Automotive Engines,” 37th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECEC '02), Washington, DC, July 29–31, pp. 464–469.
Kawano, D. , Goto, Y. , Odaka, M. , and Senda, J. , 2004, “ Modeling Atomization and Vaporization Processes of Flash-Boiling Spray,” SAE Paper No. 2004-01-0534.
Zeng, Y. , and Lee, C. F. , 2001, “ An Atomization Model for Flash Boiling Sprays,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 169(1), pp. 45–67. [CrossRef]
Zuo, B. , Gomes, A. M. , and Rutland, C. J. , 2000, “ Modelling Superheated Fuel Sprays and Vaporization,” Int. J. Eng. Res., 1(4), pp. 321–336. [CrossRef]
Lu, N. , Reveillon, J. , Meslem, Y. , and Demoulin, F. , 2014, “ Modelling Cavitation and Flash Atomization,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2014-21988.
Henry, R. , and Fauske, H. , 1971, “ The Two-Phase Critical Flow of One Component Mixtures in Nozzles, Orifices and Short Tubes,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 93(2), pp. 179–187. [CrossRef]
Bilicki, Z. , and Kestin, J. , 1990, “ Physical Aspects of the Relaxation Model in Two-Phase Flow,” Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 428(1875), pp. 379–397. [CrossRef]
Downar-Zapolski, P. , Bilicki, Z. , Bolle, L. , and Franco, J. , 1996, “ The Non-Equilibrium Relaxation Model for One-Dimensional Flashing Liquid Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 22(3), pp. 473–483. [CrossRef]
Schmidt, D. P. , Gopalakrishnan, S. , and Jasak, H. , 2010, “ Multi-Dimensional Simulation of Thermal Non-Equilibrium Channel Flow,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 36(4), pp. 284–292. [CrossRef]
Bianchi, G. M. , Negro, S. , Forte, C. , Cazzoli, G. , and Pelloni, P. , 2009, “ The Prediction of Flash Atomization in GDI Multi-Hole Injectors,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1501.
Brennen, C. E. , 1995, Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Gopalakrishnan, S. , and Schmidt, D. , 2008, “ A Computational Study of Flashing Flow in Fuel Injector Nozzles,” SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0141.
Moulai, M. , Grover, R. , Parrish, S. , and Schmidt, D. , 2015, “ Internal and Near-Nozzle Flow in a Multi-Hole Gasoline Injector Under Flashing and Non-Flashing Conditions,” SAE Paper No. 2015-01-0944.
Engine Combustion Network, 2014, “ ‘Spray G’ Operating Condition,” Sandia National Laboratory, Livermore, CA.
Richards, K. J. , Senecal, P. K. , and Pomraning, E. , “ CONVERGE v2.2 Documentation,” Convergent Sciences, Madison, WI.
Zhao, H. , Quan, S. , Dai, M. , Pomraning, E. , Senecal, P. , Xue, Q. , Battistoni, M. , and Som, S. , 2014, “ Validation of a Three-Dimensional Internal Nozzle Flow Model Including Automatic Mesh Generation and Cavitation Effects,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(9), p. 092603. [CrossRef]
Xue, Q. , Battistoni, M. , Som, S. , Quan, S. , Senecal, P. K. , Pomraning, E. , and Schmidt, D. , 2014, “ Eulerian CFD Modeling of Coupled Nozzle Flow and Spray With Validation Against X-Ray Radiography Data,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., 7(2), pp. 1061–1072.
Xue, Q. , Battistoni, M. , Powell, C. F. , Quan, S. , Pomraning, E. , Senecal, P. K. , Schmidt, D. P. , and Som, S. , 2015, “ An Eulerian CFD Model and X-Ray Radiography for Coupled Nozzle Flow and Spray in Internal Combustion Engines,” Int. J. Multi-Phase Flows, 70, pp. 77–88. [CrossRef]
Battistoni, M. , Xue, Q. , Som, S. , and Pomraning, E. , 2014, “ Effect of Off-Axis Needle Motion on Internal Nozzle and Near Exit Flow in a Multi-Hole Diesel Injector,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., 7(1), pp. 167–182. [CrossRef]
Battistoni, M. , Som, S. , and Longman, D. E. , 2014, “ Comparison of Mixture and Multifluid Models for In-Nozzle Cavitation Prediction,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 136(6), p. 061506. [CrossRef]
Battistoni, M. , Duke, D. J. , Swantek, A. B. , Tilocco, F. Z. , Powell, C. F. , and Som, S. , 2015, “ Effects of Noncondensable Gas on Cavitating Nozzles,” Atom. Sprays, 25(6), pp. 453–483. [CrossRef]
Saha, K. , 2014, “ Modelling of Cavitation in Nozzles for Diesel Injection Applications,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Dymond, J. H. , Glen, N. F. , and Isdale, J. D. , 1985, “ Transport Properties of Nonelectrolyte Liquid Mixtures—VII: Viscosity Coefficients for Isooctane and for Equimolar Mixtures of Isooctane + n-Octane and Isooctane + n-Dodecane From 25 to 100 at Pressures Up to 500 MPa or To the Freezing Pressure,” Int. J. Thermophys., 6(3), pp. 233–250. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Layout of the eight-stepped holes of Spray G nozzle (bottom view) and the computational domain considered in this study

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Vertical cut-plane showing the mesh with 140 μm as base grid size and 9 mm outlet domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Effect of outlet domain sizes on numerical predictions, under Spray G conditions with 180 μm base grid size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Contours of Spray G—nonflashing and evaporative condition with 140 μm as base grid size and 9 mm outlet domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contours of Spray G and Spray GCool

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Vapor mass fraction contours of Spray G2—flashing condition with 140 μm as base grid size and 9 mm outlet domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Velocity and temperature contours of Spray G2—flashing condition with 140 μm as base grid size and 9 mm outlet domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Hole-to-hole variations in mass flow rates for Spray G—with 140 μm as base grid size and 9 mm outlet domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Hole-to-hole variations in mass flow rates for Spray G2—with 140 μm as base grid size and 9 mm outlet domain

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Cut-planes showing mesh inside the eight different holes of Spray G injector

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In