0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Numerical Simulation Comparison of Two Reactor Configurations for Chemical Looping Combustion and Chemical Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling

[+] Author and Article Information
Matthew A. Hamilton

The University of Utah,
50 South Central Campus Drive, Room 3290,
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9203
e-mail: Matthew.a.hamilton@utah.edu

Kevin J. Whitty

The University of Utah,
50 South Central Campus Drive, Room 3290,
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9203
e-mail: Kevin.Whitty@utah.edu

JoAnn S. Lighty

The University of Utah,
50 South Central Campus Drive, Room 3290,
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9203
e-mail: jlighty@utah.edu

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 2, 2015; final manuscript received March 17, 2016; published online April 19, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Ashwani K. Gupta.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(4), 042213 (Apr 19, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1423; doi: 10.1115/1.4033108 History: Received November 02, 2015; Revised March 17, 2016

Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU) is a carbon capture technology that utilizes a metal oxide as an oxygen carrier to selectively separate oxygen from air and release gaseous O2 into a reactor where fuel, such as coal, is combusted. Previous research has addressed reactor design for CLOU systems, but little direct comparison between different reactor designs has been performed. This study utilizes Barracuda-VR® for comparison of two system configurations, one uses circulating fluidized beds (CFB) for both the air reactor (AR) and fuel reactor (FR) and another uses bubbling fluidized beds for both reactors. Initial validation of experimental and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations was performed to show that basic trends are captured with the CFD code. The CFD simulations were then used to perform comparison of key performance parameters such as solids circulation rate and reactor residence time, pressure profiles in the reactors and loopseals, and particle velocities in different locations of the reactor as functions of total solids inventory and reactor gas flows. Using these simulation results, it was determined that the dual CFB system had larger range for solids circulation rate before choked flow was obtained. Both systems had similar particle velocities for the bottom 80% of particle mass, but the bubbling bed (BB) obtained higher particle velocities as compared to the circulating fluidized-bed FR, due to the transport riser. As a system, the results showed that the dual CFB configuration allowed better control over the range of parameters tested.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

IPCC, 2014, “Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,” R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer , eds., IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2012, “ Carbon Dioxide Emissions,” http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/ghgemissions/gases/co2.html
Granite, E. J. , and O’Brien, T. , 2005, “ Review of Novel Methods for Carbon Dioxide Separation From Flue and Fuel Gases,” Fuel Process. Technol., 86(14–15), pp. 1423–1434. [CrossRef]
Stromberg, L. , 2001, “Discussion on the Potential and Cost of Different CO2 Emission Control Options,” VGB Power Tech, Essen, Germany.
Ekstroom, C. , Schwendig, F. , Biede, O. , Franco, F. , Haupt, G. , de Koeijer, G. , Papapavlou, C. , and Rookke, P. E. , 2009, “ Techno-Economic Evaluations and Benchmarking of Pre-Combustion CO2 Capture and Oxy-Fuel Processes Developed in the European ENCAP Project,” Energy Proc., pp. 4233–4240.
Mattisson, T. , Lyngfelt, A. , and Leion, H. , 2009, “ Chemical-Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling for Combustion of Solid Fuels,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 3(1), pp. 11–19. [CrossRef]
Mattisson, T. , 2013, “ Materials for Chemical-Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling,” ISRN Chem. Eng., 2013(1), pp. 1–19. [CrossRef]
Leion, H. , Mattisson, T. , and Lyngfelt, A. , 2009, “ Using Chemical-Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU) for Combustion of Six Different Solid Fuels,” Energy Proc., 1(1), pp. 447–453. [CrossRef]
Lyngfelt, A. , 2014, “ Chemical-Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels—Status of Development,” Appl. Energy, 113, pp. 1869–1873. [CrossRef]
Yerushalmi, J. , Turner, D. H. , and Squires, A. M. , 1976, “ The Fast Fluidized Bed,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 15(1), pp. 47–53. [CrossRef]
Basu, P. , and Fraser, S. A. , 1991, Circulating Fluidized Bed Boilers: Design and Operations, Butterworth-Heinemann, Stoneham, MA.
Grace, J. , 1990, “ High-Velocity Fluidized Bed Reactors,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 45(8), pp. 1953–1966. [CrossRef]
Kunii, D. , and Levenspiel, O. , 1991, Fluidization Engineering, Butterworth-Heinemann, Newton, MA.
Berguerand, N. , and Lyngfelt, A. , 2008, “ Design and Operation of a 10 kWth Chemical-Looping Combustor for Solid Fuels—Testing With South African Coal,” Fuel, 87(12), pp. 2713–2726. [CrossRef]
Berguerand, N. , and Lyngfelt, A. , 2009, “ Chemical-Looping Combustion of Petroleum Coke Using Ilmenite in a 10 kWth Unit-High-Temperature Operation,” Energy Fuels, 23(10), pp. 5257–5268. [CrossRef]
Bischi, A. , Langørgen, Ø. , Saanum, I. , Bakken, J. , Seljeskog, M. , Bysveen, M. , Morin, J.-X. , and Bolland, O. , 2011, “ Design Study of a 150 kWth Double Loop Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor System for Chemical Looping Combustion With Focus on Industrial Applicability and Pressurization,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5(3), pp. 467–474. [CrossRef]
Kimball, E. , Lambert, A. , Fossdal, A. , and Leenman, R. , 2013, “ Reactor Choices for Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC)—Dependencies on Materials Characteristics,” Energy Proc., 37, pp. 567–574. [CrossRef]
Markström, P. , Linderholm, C. , and Lyngfelt, A. , 2013, “ Chemical-Looping Combustion of Solid Fuels—Design and Operation of a 100 kW Unit With Bituminous Coal,” Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 15, pp. 150–162. [CrossRef]
Ströhle, J. , Orth, M. , and Epple, B. , 2014, “ Design and Operation of a 1 MWth Chemical Looping Plant,” Appl. Energy, 113, pp. 1490–1495. [CrossRef]
Kolbitsch, P. , Pröll, T. , Bolhar-Nordenkampf, J. , and Hofbauer, H. , 2009, “ Design of a Chemical Looping Combustor Using a Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed (DCFB) Reactor System,” Chem. Eng. Technol., 32(3), pp. 398–403. [CrossRef]
Parker, J. M. , 2014, “ CFD Model for the Simulation of Chemical Looping Combustion,” Powder Technol., 265, pp. 47–53. [CrossRef]
Kim, H. R. , Wang, D. , Zeng, L. , Bayham, S. , Tong, A. , Chung, E. , Kathe, M. V , Luo, S. , Mcgiveron, O. , Wang, A. , Sun, Z. , Chen, D. , and Fan, L. , 2013, “ Coal Direct Chemical Looping Combustion Process: Design and Operation of a 25-kWth Sub-Pilot Unit,” Fuel, 108, pp. 370–384. [CrossRef]
Chapman, P. J. , Abdulally, I. F. , Kang, S. G. , and Gauville, P. , 2014, “ Application of CFD Modeling Tools to Optimize 660 MW Ultra Supercritical CFB Design,” 11th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Technology, Beijing, pp. 469–474.
Suraniti, S. L. , Nsakala, N. Y. , and Darling, S. L. , 2009, “ Alstom Oxyfuel CFB Boilers: A Promising Option for CO2 Capture,” Energy Proc., 1(1), pp. 543–548. [CrossRef]
Sharma, R. , Delebarre, A. , and Alappat, B. , 2015, “ Chemical Looping Combustion—An Overview and Application of the Recirculating Fluidized Bed Reactor for Improvement,” Int. J. Energy R., 38(10), pp. 1331–1350. [CrossRef]
Sahir, A. H. , Sohn, H. Y. , Leion, H. , and Lighty, J. S. , 2012, “ Rate Analysis of Chemical-Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling (CLOU) for Solid Fuels,” Energy Fuels, 26(7), pp. 4395–4404. [CrossRef]
Hannes, J. P. , 1996, Mathematical Modelling of Circulating Fluidized Bed Combustion, City-Pring Verlag, Aachen, Germany.
Shuai, W. , Yunchao, Y. , and Huilin, L. , 2012, “ Computational Fluid Dynamic Simulation Based Cluster Structures-Dependent Drag Coefficient Model in Dual Circulating Fluidized Beds of Chemical Looping Combustion,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(3), pp. 1396–1412. [CrossRef]
Guan, Y. , Chang, J. , Zhang, K. , Wang, B. , and Sun, Q. , 2014, “ Three-Dimensional CFD Simulation of Hydrodynamics in an Interconnected Fluidized Bed for Chemical Looping Combustion,” Powder Technol., 268, pp. 316–328. [CrossRef]
Wang, S. , Lu, H. , Zhao, F. , and Liu, G. , 2014, “ CFD Studies of Dual Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactors for Chemical Looping Combustion Processes,” Chem. Eng. J., 236, pp. 121–130. [CrossRef]
Hamilton, M. A. , Whitty, K. J. , and Lighty, J. S. , 2014, “ Scaling of a 100 kW Chemical Looping Combustion System and Performance With Different Fluidizing Gases,” 35th International Symposium on Combustion, San Francisco, CA.
Peng, Z. , Doroodchi, E. , Alghamdi, Y. A. , Shah, K. , Luo, C. , and Moghtaderi, B. , 2015, “ CFD–DEM Simulation of Solid Circulation Rate in the Cold Flow Model of Chemical Looping Systems,” Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 75, pp. 262–280. [CrossRef]
Andrews, M. , and O’rourke, P. , 1996, “ The Multiphase Particle-in-Cell (MP-PIC) Method for Dense Particulate Flows,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 22(2), pp. 379–402. [CrossRef]
O’Rourke, P. J. , Zhao, P. (Pinghua), and Snider, D. , 2009, “ A Model for Collisional Exchange in Gas/Liquid/Solid Fluidized Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 64(8), pp. 1784–1797. [CrossRef]
Snider, D. M. , and O’rourke, P. , 2011, “ The Multiphase Particle-in-Cell (MP-PIC) Method for Dense Particulate Flows,” Computational Gas-Solids Flows and Reacting Systems, pp. 277–314.
Snider, D. M. , Clark, S. M. , and O’Rourke, P. J. , 2011, “ Eulerian–Lagrangian Method for Three-Dimensional Thermal Reacting Flow With Application to Coal Gasifiers,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(6), pp. 1285–1295. [CrossRef]
O’Rourke, P. J. , and Snider, D. M. , 2010, “ An Improved Collision Damping Time for MP-PIC Calculations of Dense Particle Flows With Applications to Polydisperse Sedimenting Beds and Colliding Particle Jets,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 65(22), pp. 6014–6028. [CrossRef]
O’Rourke, P. J. , and Snider, D. M. , 2012, “ Inclusion of Collisional Return-to-Isotropy in the MP-PIC Method,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 80, pp. 39–54. [CrossRef]
Parker, J. , Williams, K. , Zhao, P. , and Thibault, S. , 2014, “ CPFD Modeling of Industrial-Scale Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems,” 11th International Conference on Fluidized Bed Technology, Beijing.
Snider, D. M. , 2007, “ Three Fundamental Granular Flow Experiments and CPFD Predictions,” Powder Technol., 176(1), pp. 36–46. [CrossRef]
Clark, S. M. , Snider, D. M. , and Fletcher, R. P. , 2012, “ Multiphase Simulation of a Commercial Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Regenerator,” AIChE Annual Meeting Conference Proceedings, AIChE, Pittsburgh, p. 9p.
Glicksman, L. , 1993, “ Simplified Scaling Relationships for Fluidized Beds,” Powder Technol., 77(2), pp. 177–199. [CrossRef]
Hamilton, M. A. , Whitty, K. J. , and Lighty, J. S. , 2015, “ Parametric Comparison of Dual Fluidized Bed Performance Using a Cold-Flow Unit and Barracuda-VR Simulations,” 22nd International Conference of Fluidized Bed Conversion, Turku, Finland.
Markström, P. , and Lyngfelt, A. , 2012, “ Designing and Operating a Cold-Flow Model of a 100kW Chemical-Looping Combustor,” Powder Technol., 222, pp. 182–192. [CrossRef]
CPFD Software, 2014, “ Barracuda Series 16 Training Manual,” CPFD Software, LLC, Albuquerque, NM, pp. 1–219.
Larsén, R. , 2014, “Construction and Initial Testing of a Lab-Scale Chemical Looping System,” Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.
Glicksman, L. , 1984, “ Scaling Relationships for Fluidized Beds,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 39(9), pp. 1373–1379. [CrossRef]
Clayton, C. K. , and Whitty, K. J. , 2014, “ Measurement and Modeling of Decomposition Kinetics for Copper Oxide-Based Chemical Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling,” Appl. Energy, 116, pp. 416–423. [CrossRef]
Clayton, C. K. , Sohn, H. Y. , and Whitty, K. J. , 2014, “ Oxidation Kinetics of Cu2O in Oxygen Carriers for Chemical Looping With Oxygen Uncoupling,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(8), pp. 2976–2986. [CrossRef]
Rydén, M. , and Arjmand, M. , 2012, “ Continuous Hydrogen Production Via the Steam–Iron Reaction by Chemical Looping in a Circulating Fluidized-Bed Reactor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 37(6), pp. 4843–4854. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling diagram

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Solid fraction profile versus dimensionless height for different fluidization regimes. Figure adapted from Ref. [13].

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic of the cold-flow unit, a dual CFB system, used in the simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Particle size distribution

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic of the bench-scale unit: (1) AR, (2) cyclone, (3) upper loopseal, (4) FR, and (5) lower loopseal. System is a dual BB and numbers indicate flow pattern.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Dual CFB circulation rate versus volumetric flow rate with an FR fluidizing velocity of 2.22 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dual CFB bed mass and residence time fluidizing velocity for (a) AR and (b) FR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Dual BB reactor global circulation rate versus AR volumetric flow rate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Dual BB reactor bed mass and residence time versus AR fluidizing velocity for (a) AR and (b) FR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Circulation rate comparison versus AR volumetric flow rate normalized with reactor diameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Reactor residence time versus AR volumetric flow rate normalized by reactor diameter: (a) AR and (b) FR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Particle cumulative percentage versus particle velocity

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In