Research Papers: Energy Systems Analysis

Static and Dynamic Modeling Comparison of an Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage System

[+] Author and Article Information
Youssef Mazloum

CES—Center for Energy Efficiency of Systems,
MINES ParisTech,
PSL-Research University,
Z.I. Les Glaizes—5 rue Léon Blum,
Palaiseau 91120, France
e-mail: youssef.mazloum@mines-paristech.fr

Haytham Sayah

CES—Center for Energy Efficiency of Systems,
MINES ParisTech,
PSL-Research University,
Z.I. Les Glaizes—5 rue Léon Blum,
Palaiseau 91120, France
e-mail: haytham.sayah@mines-paristech.fr

Maroun Nemer

CES—Center for Energy Efficiency of Systems,
MINES ParisTech,
PSL-Research University,
Z.I. Les Glaizes—5 rue Léon Blum,
Palaiseau 91120, France
e-mail: maroun.nemer@mines-paristech.fr

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received October 13, 2015; final manuscript received April 2, 2016; published online May 5, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Alojz Poredos.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 138(6), 062001 (May 05, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1382; doi: 10.1115/1.4033399 History: Received October 13, 2015; Revised April 02, 2016

The large-scale production of renewable energy is limited by the intermittence nature of the renewable energy sources. Moreover, the electricity production of the thermal and nuclear power plants is not flexible with the electricity demand. Hence, the integration of energy storage technologies into the grid has become crucial as it creates a balance between supply and demand for electricity and protects thereby the electrical grid. Among the large-scale energy storage technologies, a novel adiabatic compressed air energy storage (A-CAES) system will be developed in this paper. This storage system is characterized, compared to the conventional compressed air energy storage (CAES) system, by the recovery and the reuse of the compression heat in order to improve the system efficiency and avoid the use of fossil fuel sources. This paper discusses a comparison between the static and dynamic modeling of the A-CAES system performed by a computer simulation using “Modelica.” Unlike the static model, the dynamic model takes into account the mechanical inertia of the turbomachinery (compressors and turbines) as well as the thermal inertia of the heat exchangers. Consequently, it enables studying the flexibility of the storage system and its ability to meet the electrical grid requirements (primary and secondary reserves) by evaluating the duration of the transient states. Furthermore, the comparison between the static and dynamic models permits to estimate the efficiency losses due to the transient evolutions.The results show that the storage system needs more than 2 min before being able to consume all the excess energy available on the electrical grid and more than 5 min before being able to produce all the energy required by the electrical grid. These time frames are due especially to the transient states (start-up) of the turbomachines. Finally, the system efficiency is 64.7%, the transient states of the system cause losses of 0.9%. These small losses are explained by the short duration of the transient states relative to that of the steady states (15 hrs).

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Saadat, M. , and Li, P. Y. , 2012, “ Modeling and Control of a Novel Compressed Air Energy Storage System for Offshore Wind Turbine,” American Control Conference (ACC), Montréal, Canada, June 27–29, pp. 3032–3037.
Chedid, R. , Salameh, S. , Karaki, S. , Yehia, M. , and Al-Ali, R. , 1999, “ Optimization of Electrical Distribution Networks Fed by Conventional and Renewable Energy Sources,” Int. J. Energy Res., 23(9), pp. 751–763. [CrossRef]
Khaitan, S. K. , and Raju, M. , 2013, “ Dynamic Simulation of Air Storage-Based Gas Turbine Plants,” Int. J. Energy Res., 37(6), pp. 558–569. [CrossRef]
Hoffeins, H. , 1994, “ Huntorf Air Storage Gas Turbine Power Plant,” Energy Supply, Brown Boveri Publication, Mannheim, Germany.
Hounslow, D. R. , Grindley, W. , Louglin, R. M. , and Daly, J. , 1998, “ The Development of a Combustion System for a 110 MW CAES Plant,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120(4), pp. 875–883. [CrossRef]
Jacquelin, L. M. , Lacroix, O. , and Bordeleau, M. , 2012, “ Enjeux, solutions techniques et opportunités de valorisation,” Le stockage d'énergie, ENEA Consulting, Paris.
Lemofouet, S. , and Rufer, A. , 2005, “ Hybrid Energy Storage Systems Based on Compressed Air and Supercapacitors With Maximum Efficiency Point Tracking,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 53(4), pp. 1105–1115. [CrossRef]
Vongmanee, V. , and Monyakul, V. , 2008, “ A Modeling of Small-Compressed Air Energy Storage System (Small-CAES) for Wind Energy Applications,” GMSARN International Conference on Sustainable Development: Issues and Prospects for the GMS, Kunming, China, Nov. 12–14.
Vongmanee, V. , and Monyakul, V. , 2008, “ A New Concept of Small-Compressed Air Energy Storage System Integrated With Induction Generator,” IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET), Singapore, Nov. 24–27, pp. 866–871.
Nielsen, L. , and Leithner, R. , 2009, “ Dynamic Simulation of an Innovative Compressed Air Energy Storage Plant—Detailed Modeling of the Storage Cavern,” WSEAS Trans. Power Syst., 4(8), pp. 253–263.
Martinez, M. , and Mercado, P. E. , 2010, “ Dynamic Performance of Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) Plant for Applications in Power Systems,” IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition: Latin America (T&D-LA), Sao Paulo, Brazil, Nov. 8–10, pp. 496–503.
Raju, M. , and Khaitan, S. , 2012, “ Modeling and Simulation of Compressed Air Storage in Caverns: A Case Study of Huntorf CAES Plant,” Appl. Energy, 89(1), pp. 474–481. [CrossRef]
Dassault, “ CATIA Systems Engineering—Dymola,” Dassault Systems, Canonsburg, PA, http://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/capabilities/modelica-systems-simulation-info/dymola
Cooper, J. R. , and Dooley, R. B. , 2007, “ Release on the Ionization Constant of H2O,” The International Association for the Properties of Water and Steam, Lucerne, Switzerland.
McBride, B. J. , Zehe, M. J. , and Gordon, S. , 2002, “ NASA Glenn Coefficients for Calculating Thermodynamic Properties of Individual Species,” NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, Report No. TP-2002-211556.
Lemofouet-Gatsi, S. , 2006, Investigation and Optimization of Hybrid Electricity Storage Systems Based on Compressed Air and Supercapacitors, Institut des sciences de l'énergie, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Schalbart, P. , 2006, “ Modélisation du Fonctionnement en régime dynamique d'une machine frigorifique bi-étagée à turbo-compresseurs-Application à sa Régulation,” Institut national des sciences appliquées de Lyon, Vol. 195, Ecole doctorale MEGA, Lyon, France, pp. 61–73.
Balje, O. E. , 1981, Turbomachines, Wiley, New York.
Incropera, F. , and Dewitt, D. , 1996, Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 886, Wiley, New York, pp. 420–515.
Idelchik, I. E. , 1993, Handbook of Hydraulic Resistance, 3rd ed., Vol. 788, Jaico Publishing House, Mumbai, India.
Chaddock, J. B. , 1965, “ Moist Air Properties From Tabulated Virial Coefficients,” Humidity and Moisture Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, Vol. 3, A. Wexler and W. A. Wildhack , eds., Reinhold Publishing, New York.
Crotogino, F. , Mohmeyer, K. , and Scharf, R. , 2001, “ Huntorf CAES: More Than 20 Years of Successful Operation,” Solution Mining Research Institute Spring 2001 Meeting, Orlando, FL, Apr. 15–18, pp. 351–357.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the A-CAES plant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Static and dynamic internal pressures of the cavern

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Static and dynamic polytropic efficiencies of the compressor low-pressure stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Static and dynamic polytropic efficiencies of the turbine high-pressure stage

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Static and dynamic compressor mass flow rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Static and dynamic compressor powers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Static and dynamic turbine mass flow rates

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Static and dynamic turbine powers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Static and dynamic water output temperatures of the low-pressure cooler

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Static and dynamic temperatures of the hot water tanks

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Static and dynamic air output temperatures of the high-pressure heater




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In