0
Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Thermoporoelastic Modeling of Time-Dependent Wellbore Strengthening and Casing Smear

[+] Author and Article Information
Raj Kiran

Mewbourne School of Petroleum
and Geological Engineering,
University of Oklahoma,
Norman, OK 73019

Saeed Salehi

Assistant Professor
Mewbourne School of Petroleum
and Geological Engineering,
University of Oklahoma,
Norman, OK 73019
e-mail: saeads@gmail.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received February 15, 2016; final manuscript received April 22, 2016; published online July 25, 2016. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(2), 022903 (Jul 25, 2016) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1092; doi: 10.1115/1.4033591 History: Received February 15, 2016; Revised April 22, 2016

One of the most critical aspects in the drilling operation is to reduce the nonproductive time and to avoid the borehole instability issues such as kicks, blow outs, lost circulation, stuck pipe, and breakouts. To investigate these problems, one has to understand the formation properties, fluid hydraulics, and the basic mechanics behind drilling a well. In the previous research on this field, the factors were widely discussed and results obtained were related to the formation properties. However, while considering the stresses in the wellbore, the mechanical factors such as the RPM and contact of casing at different positions in wellbore have usually been neglected. In furtherance to this study, the importance of thermal condition, fluid loss, and filter cake formation study cannot be out ruled. This work includes a new insight toward understanding the stress redistribution due to pipe contact by the wellbore and smear mechanism. Additionally, it presents the numerical analysis of influence of casing contact and downhole thermal conditions using the finite-element analysis. The classical equations used to obtain the wellbore stresses include very few parameters such as the far-field stresses, pore pressure, and wellbore geometry. They do not consider the influence of casing contact while drilling, mud-cake permeability, and elastic and inelastic properties of the formation. To take into account the effects of these parameters, finite-element analysis is carried out considering the above-mentioned parameters in various scenarios. The main objective of these simulations is to investigate the hypothesis of the increase in hoop stress considering casing contact with regard to formation stresses orientation. The study of different cases shows the variation of a few hundred psi of hoop stress. However, the thermal effect on the near-wellbore stress regions can be important for drilling in deep water and other complex drilling environments. To see the thermal effect, this study develops a thermoporoelastic model. It is found that there is decrease in radial stress and hoop stress in near-wellbore region with time. This reduction will have a considerable impact on fracture initiation pressure in the near-wellbore region. Also, the smearing effect will be influenced by stress changes due to change in temperature.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Zhang, J. , Keaney, G. , and Standifird, W. , 2006, “ Wellbore Stability With Consideration of Pore Pressure and Drilling Fluid Interactions,” 41st U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Golden, CO, June 17–21, Paper No. ARMA-06-922.
Salehi, S. , and Nygaard, R. , 2012, “ Numerical Modeling of Induced Fracture Propagation: A Novel Approach for Lost Circulation Materials (LCM) Design in Borehole Strengthening Applications of Deep Offshore Drilling,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 8–10, Paper No. SPE-135155-MS.
Salehi, S. , and Nygaard, R. , 2014, “ Full Fluid–Solid Cohesive Finite-Element Model to Simulate Near Wellbore Fractures,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(1), p. 012903. [CrossRef]
Mokhtari, M. , Tutuncu, A. N. , and Weldu Teklu, T. W. , 2013, “ A Numerical Modeling Study for the Impact of Casing Drilling on Wellbore Stability,” SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, AB, Canada, Nov. 5–7, Paper No. SPE-167166-MS.
Salehi, S. , and Nygaard, R. , 2011, “ Evaluation of New Drilling Approach for Widening Operational Window: Implications for Wellbore Strengthening,” SPE Production and Operations Symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, Mar. 27–29, Paper No. SPE-140753-MS.
Alberty, M. W. , and McLean, M. R. , 2004, “ A Physical Model for Stress Cages,” SPE Annual Technical Conference, Houston, TX, Sept. 26–29, Paper No. SPE 90493.
Wang, H. , and Towler, B. F. , 2007, “ Fractured Wellbore Stress Analysis: Sealing Cracks to Strengthen a Wellbore,” SPE Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Feb. 20–22, Paper No. SPE-104947-MS.
Salehi, S. , and Kiran, R. , 2016, “ Integrated Experimental and Analytical Wellbore Strengthening Solutions by Mud Plastering Effects,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 138(3), p. 032904. [CrossRef]
Maury, V. , and Guenot, A. , 1995, “ Practical Advantages of Mud Cooling Systems for Drilling,” SPE Drill. Completion, 10(1), pp. 42–48. [CrossRef]
Gonzalez, M. E. , Bloys, J. B. , Lofton, J. E. , Pepin, G. P. , Schmidt, J. H. , Naquin, C. J. , and Laursen, P. E. , 2004, “ Increasing Effective Fracture Gradients by Managing Wellbore Temperatures,” IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, Dallas, TX, Mar. 2–4, Paper No. SPE-87217-MS.
Aadnoy, S. B. , and Belayneh, M. , 2008, “ A New Fracture Model That Includes Load History, Temperature and Poisson's Effects,” IADC/SPE Asia Pacific Drilling Technology Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta, Indonesia, Aug. 25–27, Paper No. SPE-114829-MS.
Nygaard, R. , and Salehi, S. A. , 2011, “ A Critical Review of Wellbore Strengthening: Physical Model and Field Deployment,” AADE National Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, Apr. 12–14, Paper No. AADE-11-NTCE-24.
Fjaer, E. , Holt, R. M. , Horsrud, P. , Raaen, A. M. , and Risnes, R. , 2008, Petroleum Related Rock Mechanics, 2nd ed., Elsevier B.V., New York.
Jaeger, J. C. , Cook, N. G. W. , and Zimmerman, R. W. , 2007, Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 4th ed., Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
Pepin, G. , Gonzalez, M. , Bloys, J. B. , Lofton, J. , Schmidt, J. , Naquin, C. , and Ellis, S. , 2004, “ Effect of Drilling Fluid Temperature on Fracture Gradient: Field Measurements and Model Predictions,” 6th North America Rock Mechanics Symposium (NARMS), Houston, TX, June 5–9, Paper No. ARMA-04-527.
Hettema, M. H. H. , Bostrøm, B. , and Lund, T. , 2004, “ Analysis of Lost Circulation During Drilling in Cooled Formations,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, TX, Sept. 26–29, Paper No. SPE-90442-MS.
Chen, G. , and Ewy, R. T. , 2005, “ Thermoporoelastic Effect on Wellbore Stability,” SPE J., 10(2), pp. 121–129. [CrossRef]
Biot, M. A. , 1941, “ General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation,” J. Appl. Phys., 12(2), pp. 155–164. [CrossRef]
Biot, M. A. , 1955, “ Theory of Elasticity and Consolidation for a Porous Anisotropic Solid,” J. Appl. Phys., 26(2), pp. 182–185. [CrossRef]
Qiao, L. P. , Wong, R. C. K. , Aguilera, R. , and Kantzas, A. , 2012, “ Determination of Biot's Effective-Stress Coefficient for Permeability of Nikanassin Sandstone,” J. Can. Pet. Technol., 51(3), pp. 193–197. [CrossRef]
Kiran, R. , Salehi, S. , and Karimi, M. , 2014, “ Finite Element Analysis of Casing Drilling Smearing Effect,” SPE Deepwater Drilling and Completions Conference, Galveston, TX, Sept. 10–11, Paper No. SPE-170314-MS.
Salehi, S. , Mgboji, J. , and Wang, S. , 2013, “ Numerical and Analytical Investigation of Smear Effect in Casing Drilling Technology: Implications for Enhancing Wellbore Integrity and Hole Cleaning,” SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Mar. 5–7, Paper No. SPE-163514-MS.
Fattah, K. A. , Sinde, S. , and Dahab, A. A. , 2012, “ Potential Implementation of Casing While Drilling Technique in the Western Desert Fields of Egypt,” North Africa Technical Conference and Exhibition, Cairo, Egypt, Feb. 20–22, Paper No. SPE-149835-MS.
Karimi, M. , Moellendick, E. , and Holt, C. , 2011, “ Plastering Effect of Casing Drilling: A Quantitative Analysis of Pipe Size Contribution,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO, Oct. 30–Nov. 2, Paper No. SPE-147102-MS.
Salehi, S. , Madani, S. A. , and Kiran, R. , 2016, “ Characterization of Drilling Fluids Filtration Through Integrated Laboratory Experiments and CFD Modeling,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 29, pp. 462–468. [CrossRef]
Kumar, A. , Singh, A. P. , and Samuel, R. , 2012, “ Analytical Model to Estimate the Downhole Temperatures for Casing While Drilling Operations,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 8–10, Paper No. SPE-159278-MS.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Finite-element analysis poroelastic model including the boundary conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Variation of radial stress and hoop stress with Young's modulus

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Variation of radial stress and hoop stress with Poisson's ratio

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Hoop stress around the wellbore with varying RPM when contact force is applied along maximum horizontal stress orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Hoop stress around wellbore with varying RPM when contact force is applied along minimum horizontal stress orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Hoop stresses around wellbore with varying annulus-to-hole (A/H) ratio when contact force is applied along minimum horizontal stress orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Hoop stresses around the wellbore with varying annulus-to-hole (AHR) ratio when contact force is applied along maximum horizontal stress orientation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Sandstone slabs used in the experiments with a range of permeabilities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Variation in hoop stress in 1110 mD formation with time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Variation in hoop stress for different formations with time

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Hoop stress around the borehole in field case

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In