0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

An Investigation of Multi-Injection Strategies for a Dual-Fuel Pilot Diesel Ignition Engine at Low Load

[+] Author and Article Information
Amin Yousefi

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada

Madjid Birouk

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Manitoba,
Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada
e-mail: Madjid.Birouk@umanitoba.ca

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Internal Combustion Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 25, 2016; final manuscript received May 17, 2016; published online June 21, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Stephen A. Ciatti.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(1), 012201 (Jun 21, 2016) (15 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1051; doi: 10.1115/1.4033707 History: Received January 25, 2016; Revised May 17, 2016

A multidimensional computational fluid dynamic (CFD) model was developed in order to explore the combined effect of injection timing and fuels quantity ratio of different injection strategies on the combustion performance and emissions characteristics of a dual-fuel indirect injection (IDI) engine with a pilot diesel ignition. The total mass of pilot diesel and premixed natural gas equivalence ratio were kept constant while various injection strategies (single, double, and triple) were investigated at 25% engine load and speed of 800 rpm. Results revealed that the released heat of triple injection pulse during the expansion stroke is the same or higher than that of single and double injection pulses at specified injection timings. It affects positively the engine performance. The highest indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) can be achieved using single injection pulse at all first injection timings. It is observed that double and triple injection pulses possess comparable indicated thermal efficiency (ITE) and IMEP to those of single injection at specified injection timings. The highest ITE is found 47.5% at first injection timing of −16 deg after top dead center (ATDC) for both single and double injection pulses. Nitrogen oxides (NOx) mole fraction generally increases when retarding the injection timing. By applying double and triple injection pulses, NOx emissions decrease, on average, by 9% and 14% compared to that of the single injection pulse. Using double and triple injection pulses, soot emissions increase, on average, by 10% and 32%, respectively, compared to single injection pulse. However, at specified injection timings, the effect of all injection pulses on soot emissions is negligible at relative advanced first injection timing. Carbon monoxide (CO) emissions decrease slightly for all injection strategies when the injection timing varies from −20 deg ATDC to −12 deg ATDC. In this range, dual-fuel operation with triple injection pulse produces the lowest CO emissions. By using triple injection pulse at suitable injection timings, CO emissions decrease by around 7.4% compared to single injection pulse. However, by applying double and triple injection pulses, unburned methane increases, on average, by 16% and 52%, respectively, compared with that of single injection pulse. However, at injection timings of −12 deg ATDC and −8 deg ATDC, triple and double injection pulses produce comparable level of unburned methane to that of single injection pulse.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Rezaei, S. Z. , Zhang, F. , Xu, H. , Ghafourian, A. , Herreros, J. M. , and Shuai, S. , 2013, “ Investigation of Two-Stage Split-Injection Strategies for a Dieseline Fueled PPCI Engine,” Fuel, 107, pp. 299–308. [CrossRef]
Musculus, P. B. , Miles, C. , and Pickett, L. M. , 2013, “ Conceptual Models for Partially Premixed Low-Temperature Diesel Combustion,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 39(2–3), pp. 246–283. [CrossRef]
Uyumaz, A. , 2015, “ An Experimental Investigation Into Combustion and Performance Characteristics of an HCCI Gasoline Engine Fueled With n-Heptane, Isopropanol and n-Butanol Fuel Blends at Different Inlet Air Temperatures,” Energy Convers. Manage., 98, pp. 199–207. [CrossRef]
Canakci, M. , 2012, “ Combustion Characteristics of a DI-HCCI Gasoline Engine Running at Different Boost Pressures,” Fuel, 96, pp. 546–555. [CrossRef]
Benajes, J. , Novella, R. , Garcia, A. , Domenech, V. , and Durrett, R. , 2011, “ An Investigation on Mixing and Auto-Ignition Using Diesel and Gasoline in a Direct-Injection Compression-Ignition Engine Operating in PCCI Combustion Conditions,” SAE Paper No. 2011-37-0008.
Ying, W. , Li, H. , Jie, Z. , and Longbao, Z. , 2009, “ Study of HCCI-DI Combustion and Emissions in a DME Engine,” Fuel, 88(11), pp. 2255–2261. [CrossRef]
Nobakht, A. Y. , Khoshbakhi Saray, R. , and Rahimi, A. , 2011, “ A Parametric Study on Natural Gas Fueled HCCI Combustion Engine Using a Multi-Zone Combustion Model,” Fuel, 90(4), pp. 1508–1514. [CrossRef]
Sudheesh, K. , and Mallikarjuna, J. M. , 2010, “ Diethyl Ether as an Ignition Improver for Biogas Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Operation—An Experimental Investigation,” Energy, 35(9), pp. 3614–3622. [CrossRef]
He, B. Q. , Liu, M. B. , and Zhao, H. , 2015, “ Comparison of Combustion Characteristics of n-Butanol/Ethanol–Gasoline Blends in a HCCI Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 95, pp. 101–109. [CrossRef]
Yao, M. , Zheng, Z. , and Qin, J. , 2006, “ Experimental Study on Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition Combustion With Fuel of Dimethyl Ether and Natural Gas,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 128(2), pp. 414–420. [CrossRef]
Yang, Z. , Chu, C. , Wang, L. , and Huang, Y. , 2015, “ Effects of H2 Addition on Combustion and Exhaust Emissions in a Diesel Engine,” Fuel, 139, pp. 190–197. [CrossRef]
Thurnheer, T. , Edenhauser, D. , Soltic, P. , Schreiber, D. , Kirchen, P. , and Sankowski, A. , 2011, “ Experimental Investigation on Different Injection Strategies in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine: Emissions and Loss Analysis,” Energy Convers. Manage., 52(1), pp. 457–467. [CrossRef]
Mohan, B. , Yang, W. , and Chou, S. K. , 2013, “ Fuel Injection Strategies for Performance Improvement and Emissions Reduction in Compression Ignition Engines—A Review,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 28, pp. 664–676. [CrossRef]
Yao, M. , Wang, H. , Zheng, Z. , and Yue, Y. , 2010, “ Experimental Study of n-Butanol Additive and Multi-Injection on HD Diesel Engine Performance and Emissions,” Fuel, 89(9), pp. 2191–2201. [CrossRef]
Mobasheri, R. , Peng, Z. , and Mirsalim, S. M. , 2011, “ CFD Evaluation of Effects of Split Injection on Combustion and Emissions in a DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 2011-01-0822.
Nehmer, D. A. , and Reitz, R. D. , 1994, “ Measurement of the Effect of Injection Rate and Split Injections on Diesel Engine Soot and NOx Emissions,” SAE Paper No. 940668.
Tow, T. C. , Pierpont, D. A. , and Reitz, R. D. , 1994, “ Reducing Particulate and NOx Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Heady Duty DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 940897.
Han, Z. , Uludogan, A. , Hampson, G. J. , and Reitz, R. D. , 1996, “ Mechanism of Soot and NOx Emission Reduction Using Multiple Injection in a Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 960633.
Lee, J. , Jeon, J. , Park, J. , and Bae, C. , 2009, “ Effect of Multiple Injection Strategies on Emission and Combustion Characteristics in a Single Cylinder Direct-Injection Optical Engine,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-1354.
Torregrosa, A. J. , Broatch, A. , Garcia, A. , and Monico, L. F. , 2013, “ Sensitivity of Combustion Noise and NOx and Soot Emissions to Pilot Injection in PCCI Diesel Engines,” Appl. Energy, 104, pp. 149–157. [CrossRef]
Maghbouli, A. , Yang, W. , An, H. , Li, J. , and Shafee, S. , 2015, “ Effects of Injection Strategies and Fuel Injector Configuration on Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a DI Diesel Engine Fueled by Bio-Diesel,” Renewable Energy, 76, pp. 687–698. [CrossRef]
Zhuang, J. , Qiao, X. , Bai, J. , and Hu, Z. , 2014, “ Effect of Injection Strategy on Combustion, Performance, and Emission Characteristics in a DI-Diesel Engine Fueled With Diesel From Direct Coal Liquefaction,” Fuel, 121, pp. 141–148. [CrossRef]
Herfatmanesh, M. R. , Lu, P. , Anbari, M. , and Zhao, H. , 2013, “ Experimental Investigation Into the Effects of Two-Stage Injection on Fuel Injection Quantity, Combustion, and Emissions in a High-Speed Optical Common-Rail Diesel Engine,” Fuel, 109, pp. 137–147. [CrossRef]
Huang, J. , Lin, L. , Wang, Y. , Qin, J. , Roskilly, A. P. , Li, L. , Ouyang, T. , and Yu, Y. , 2011, “ Experimental Study of the Performance and Emission Characteristics of Diesel Engine Using Direct and Indirect Injection Systems and Different Fuels,” Fuel Process. Technol., 92(7), pp. 1380–1386. [CrossRef]
Pinchon, P. , 1989, “ Three Dimensional Modeling of Combustion in a Prechamber Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 890666.
Yang, B. , Xi, C. , Wei, X. , Zeng, K. , and Lai, M. , 2015, “ Parametric Investigation of Natural Gas Port Injection and Diesel Pilot Injection on the Combustion and Emissions of a Turbocharged Common Rail Dual-Fuel Engine at Low Load,” Appl. Energy, 143, pp. 130–137. [CrossRef]
Abdelaal, M. M. , and Hegab, A. H. , 2012, “ Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a Natural Gas-Fueled Diesel Engine With EGR,” Energy Convers. Manage., 64, pp. 301–312. [CrossRef]
Polk, A. C. , Carpenter, C. D. , Srinivasan, K. K. , and Krishnan, S. R. , 2014, “ An Investigation of Diesel-Ignited Propane Dual Fuel Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” Fuel, 132, pp. 135–148. [CrossRef]
Yousefi, A. , Gharehghani, A. , and Birouk, M. , 2015, “ Comparison Study on Combustion Characteristics and Emissions of a Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Engine With and Without Pre-Combustion Chamber,” Energy Convers. Manage., 100, pp. 232–241. [CrossRef]
Yousefi, A. , Birouk, M. , Lawler, B. , and Gharehghani, A. , 2015, “ Performance and Emissions of a Dual-Fuel Pilot Diesel Ignition Engine Operating on Various Premixed Fuels,” Energy Convers. Manage., 106, pp. 322–336. [CrossRef]
Beale, C. , and Reitz, R. D. , 1999, “ Modelling Spray Atomization With the Kelvin–Helmholtz/Rayleigh–Taylor Hybrid Model,” Atomization Sprays, 9, pp. 623–650. [CrossRef]
Dukowicz, J. K. , 1979, “ Quasi-Steady Droplet Change in the Presence of Convection,” Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, Informal Report LA7997-MS.
Han, Z. , and Reitz, R. D. , 1995, “ Turbulence Modeling of Internal Combustion Engines Using RNG kε Models,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 106, pp. 267–295. [CrossRef]
Liu, J. , Zhang, X. , Wang, T. , Zhang, J. , and Wang, H. , 2015, “ Experimental and Numerical Study of the Pollution Formation in a Diesel/CNG Dual Fuel Engine,” Fuel, 159, pp. 418–429. [CrossRef]
Krishnan, S. R. , Srinivasan, K. K. , Singh, S. , Bell, S. R. , Midkiff, K. C. , and Gong, W. , 2004, “ Strategies for Reduced NOx Emissions in Pilot-Ignited Natural Gas Engines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 126(3), pp. 665–671. [CrossRef]
Wang, Y. , Zhao, Y. , Xiao, F. , and Li, D. , 2014, “ Combustion and Emission Characteristics of a Diesel Engine With DME as Port Premixing Fuel Under Different Injection Timing,” Energy Convers. Manage., 77, pp. 52–60. [CrossRef]
Kose, H. , and Ciniviz, M. , 2013, “ An Experimental Investigation of Effect on Diesel Engine Performance and Exhaust Emissions of Addition at Dual-Fuel Mode of Hydrogen,” Fuel Process. Technol., 114, pp. 26–34. [CrossRef]
Benajes, J. , Lopez, J. J. , Novella, R. , and Redon, P. , 2014, “ Comprehensive Modelling Study Analyzing the Insights of the NO–NO2 Conversion Process in Current Diesel Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 84, pp. 691–700. [CrossRef]
Heywood, J. B. , 1989, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Ramos, J. I. , 1989, Internal Combustion Engine Modeling, Hemisphere, New York.
Lavoie, G. A. , Heywood, J. B. , and Keck, J. C. , 1970, “ Experimental and Theoretical Study of Nitric Oxide Formation in Internal Combustion Engines,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 1(4), pp. 313–26. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the experimental setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of the in-cylinder pressure between experiments and simulation for cases 1 and 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Comparison of emissions between experiments and simulation for case 2: (a) NOx and (b) unburned CH4 and CO

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

In-cylinder pressure for different injection strategies at 25% of full engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Peak in-cylinder pressure for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

HRR for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

In-cylinder mean temperature for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

In-cylinder maximum mean temperature for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) IMEP and (b) ITE for different injection strategies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

NOx emissions for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Distribution of (a) NO and (b) NO2 mass fraction of the different injection strategies for TDC and 20 deg ATDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Soot emissions for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Distribution of soot mass fraction of the different injection strategies for TDC and 20 deg ATDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

CO emissions for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Distribution of CO mass fraction of the different injection strategies for TDC and 35 deg ATDC

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Unburned CH4 emissions for different injection strategies at 25% engine load

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Distribution of unburned methane of the different injection strategies for TDC and 35 deg ATDC

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In