0
Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Use of Clustered Covariance and Selective Measurement Data in Ensemble Smoother for Three-Dimensional Reservoir Characterization

[+] Author and Article Information
Kyungbook Lee, Taehun Lee

Petroleum and Marine Research Division,
Korea Institute of Geoscience
and Mineral Resources,
Daejeon 34132, South Korea

Seungpil Jung

E&P Business Division,
SK Innovation,
Seoul 03188, South Korea

Jonggeun Choe

Department of Energy Systems Engineering,
Seoul National University,
Seoul 08826, South Korea
e-mail: johnchoe@snu.ac.kr

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 22, 2016; final manuscript received August 2, 2016; published online August 23, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Daoyong (Tony) Yang.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(2), 022905 (Aug 23, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1036; doi: 10.1115/1.4034443 History: Received January 22, 2016; Revised August 02, 2016

History matching is essential for estimating reservoir performances and decision makings. Ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) has been researched for inverse modeling due to lots of advantages such as uncertainty quantification, real-time updating, and easy coupling with any forward simulator. However, it requires lots of forward simulations due to recursive update. Although ensemble smoother (ES) is much faster than EnKF, it is more vulnerable to overshooting and filter divergence problems. In this research, ES is coupled with both clustered covariance and selective measurement data to manage the two typical problems mentioned. As preprocessing work of clustered covariance, reservoir models are grouped by the distance-based method, which consists of Minkowski distance, multidimensional scaling, and K-means clustering. Also, meaningless measurement data are excluded from assimilation such as shut-in bottomhole pressures, which are too similar on every well. For a benchmark model, PUNQ-S3, a standard ES with 100 ensembles, shows severe over- and undershooting problem with log-permeability values from 36.5 to −17.3. The concept of the selective use of observed data partially mitigates the problem, but it cannot match the true production. However, the proposed method, ES with clustered covariance and selective measurement data together, manages the overshooting problem and follows histogram of the permeability in the reference field. Uncertainty quantifications on future field productions give reliable prediction, containing the true performances. Therefore, this research extends the applicatory of ES to 3D reservoirs by improving reliability issues.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Kalman, R. E. , 1960, “ A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems,” J. Basic Eng., 82(1), pp. 35–45. [CrossRef]
Evensen, G. , 1994, “ Sequential Data Assimilation With a Nonlinear Quasi-Geostrophic Model Using Monte Carlo Methods to Forecast Error Statistics,” J. Geophys. Res., 99(C5), pp. 10143–10162. [CrossRef]
Nævdal, G. , Mannseth, T. , and Vefring, E. H. , 2002, “ Near-Well Reservoir Monitoring Through Ensemble Kalman Filter,” SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, OK, Apr. 13–17, Paper No. SPE 75235.
Zhang, Y. , and Yang, D. , 2013, “ Simultaneous Estimation of Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure for Tight Formations Using Ensemble-Based History Matching Method,” Comput. Fluids, 71(1), pp. 446–460. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , Li, H. , and Yang, D. , 2012, “ Simultaneous Estimation of Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure Using Ensemble-Based History Matching Technique,” Transp. Porous Media, 94(1), pp. 259–276. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , and Yang, D. , 2014, “ Estimation of Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure for Tight Formations by Assimilating Field Production Data,” Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng., 22(7), pp. 1150–1175. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , Song, C. , and Yang, D. , 2016, “ A Damped Iterative EnKF Method to Estimate Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure for Tight Formations From Displacement Experiments,” Fuel, 167, pp. 306–315. [CrossRef]
Gu, Y. , and Oliver, D. S. , 2005, “ The Ensemble Kalman Filter for Continuous Updating of Reservoir Simulation Models,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 128(1), pp. 79–87. [CrossRef]
Aanonsen, S. I. , Nævdal, G. , Oliver, D. S. , Reynolds, A. C. , and Vallès, B. , 2009, “ The Ensemble Kalman Filter in Reservoir Engineering—A Review,” SPE J., 14(3), pp. 393–412. [CrossRef]
Oliver, D. S. , and Chen, Y. , 2011, “ Recent Progress on Reservoir History Matching: A Review,” Comput. Geosci., 15(1), pp. 185–221. [CrossRef]
Jung, S. , and Choe, J. , 2010, “ Stochastic Estimation of Oil Production by History Matching With Ensemble Kalman Filter,” Energy Sources, Part A, 32(10), pp. 952–961. [CrossRef]
Yeo, M. J. , Jung, S. P. , and Choe, J. , 2014, “ Covariance Matrix Localization Using Drainage Area in an Ensemble Kalman Filter,” Energy Sources, Part A, 36(19), pp. 2154–2165. [CrossRef]
Park, K. , and Choe, J. , 2006, “ Use of Ensemble Kalman Filter With 3-Dimensional Reservoir Characterization During Waterflooding,” SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, Jun. 12–15, Paper No. SPE 100178.
Lee, K. , Jung, S. , Shin, H. , and Choe, J. , 2014, “ Uncertainty Quantification of Channelized Reservoir Using Ensemble Smoother With Selective Measurement Data,” Energy Explor. Exploit., 32(5), pp. 805–816. [CrossRef]
Jafarpour, B. , and McLaughlin, D. B. , 2009, “ Reservoir Characterization With the Discrete Cosine Transform,” SPE J., 14(1), pp. 182–201. [CrossRef]
Shin, Y. , Jeong, H. , and Choe, J. , 2010, “ Reservoir Characterization Using an EnKF and a Non-Parametric Approach for Highly Non-Gaussian Permeability Fields,” Energy Sources, Part A, 32(16), pp. 1569–1578. [CrossRef]
Panwar, W. , Trivedi, J. J. , and Nejadi, S. , 2015, “ Importance of Distributed Temperature Sensor Data for Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage Reservoir Characterization and History Matching Within Ensemble Kalman Filter Framework,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(4), p. 042902. [CrossRef]
Kim, S. , Lee, C. , Lee, K. , and Choe, J. , 2016, “ Characterization of Channelized Gas Reservoirs Using Ensemble Kalman Filter With Application of Discrete Cosine Transformation,” Energy Explor. Exploit., 34(2), pp. 319–336. [CrossRef]
Van Leeuwen, P. J. , and Evensen, G. , 1996, “ Data Assimilation and Inverse Methods in Terms of a Probabilistic Formulation,” Mon. Weather Rev., 124(12), pp. 2898–2913. [CrossRef]
Skjervheim, J.-A. , and Evensen, G. , 2011, “ An Ensemble Smoother for Assisted History Matching,” SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, The Woodlands, TX, Feb. 21–23, SPE Paper No. 141929.
Chen, Y. , and Oliver, D. S. , 2012, “ Ensemble Randomized Maximum Likelihood Method as an Iterative Ensemble Smoother,” Math. Geosci., 44(1), pp. 1–26. [CrossRef]
Emerick, A. A. , and Reynolds, A. C. , 2013, “ Ensemble Smoother With Multiple Data Assimilation,” Comput. Geosci., 55, pp. 3–15. [CrossRef]
Lee, K. , Jo, G. , and Choe, J. , 2011, “ Improvement of Ensemble Kalman Filter for Improper Initial Ensembles,” Geosyst. Eng., 14(2), pp. 79–84. [CrossRef]
Lee, K. , Jeong, H. , Jung, S. , and Choe, J. , 2013, “ Characterization of Channelized Reservoir Using Ensemble Kalman Filter With Cluster Covariance,” Energy Explor. Exploit., 31(1), pp. 17–29. [CrossRef]
Lee, K. , Jeong, H. , Jung, S. , and Choe, J. , 2013, “ Improvement of Ensemble Smoother With Clustered Covariance for Channelized Reservoirs,” Energy Explor. Exploit., 31(5), pp. 713–726. [CrossRef]
Kang, B. , Lee, K. , and Choe, J. , 2016, “ Improvement of Ensemble Smoother With SVD-Assisted Sampling Scheme,” J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 141, pp. 114–124. [CrossRef]
Gu, Y. , and Oliver, D. S. , 2005, “ History Matching of the PUNQ-S3 Reservoir Model Using the Ensemble Kalman Filter,” SPE J., 10(2), pp. 217–224. [CrossRef]
Gao, G. , Zafari, M. , and Reynolds, A. C. , 2006, “ Quantifying Uncertainty for the PUNQ-S3 Problem in a Bayesian Setting With RML and EnKF,” SPE J., 11(4), pp. 506–515. [CrossRef]
Li, H. , and Yang, D. , 2011, “ Estimation of Multiple Petrophysical Parameters for the PUNQ-S3 Model Using Ensemble-Based History Matching,” SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria, May 23–26, SPE Paper No. 143583.
Suzuki, S. , and Caers, J. , 2008, “ A Distance-Based Prior Model Parameterization for Constraining Solutions of Spatial Inverse Problems,” Math. Geosci., 40(4), pp. 445–469. [CrossRef]
Lim, J. , Jin, J. , and Choe, J. , 2014, “ Features Modeling of Oil Sands Reservoirs in Metric Space,” Energy Sources, Part A, 36(24), pp. 2725–2735. [CrossRef]
Lee, H. , Jin, J. , Shin, H. , and Choe, J. , 2015, “ Efficient Prediction of SAGD Productions Using Static Factor Clustering,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(3), p. 032907. [CrossRef]
Park, J. , Jin, J. , and Choe, J. , 2015, “ Uncertainty Quantification Using Streamline Based Inversion and Distance Based Clustering,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 138(1), p. 012906. [CrossRef]
Floris, F. J. T. , Bush, M. D. , Cuypers, M. , Roggero, F. , and Syversveen, A.-R. , 2001, “ Methods for Quantifying the Uncertainty of Production Forecasts: A Comparative Study,” Pet. Geosci., 7, pp. S87–S96. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Comparison of the assimilation scheme for observed data between EnKF and ES: (a) ES, (b) EnKF, and (c) observed data (Di represents observed data at the ith observation time ti)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Procedure of the clustered covariance using a distance-based method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Top structure map and the locations of production wells of PUNQ-S3 (modified from Ref. [34]) (WOC: water oil contact, GOC: gas oil contact, PRO: production well, and X: planned to be drilled in the future)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The average of the logarithm of horizontal permeability in the first layer of the benchmark model: (a) the reference field, (b) 100 initial ensemble models, (c) results of the standard ES, and (d) results of ES with clustered covariance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The result of the distance-based clustering with three models selected and displayed from the same cluster

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Histogram of horizontal permeability in the first layer of PUNQ-S3: (a) the reference field, (b) initial ensemble model, (c) result of ES, and (d) result of ES with clustered covariance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Prediction of dynamic performances of the standard ES (the first row) and ES with clustered covariance (the second row) in the first layer of PUNQ-S3 until 16.5 y: (a) COP, (b) CGP, and (c) CWP. The thin lines represent the result of each updated model, and the thick line stands for the reference field's performance. The thick dot lines are P10, P50, and P90 of the 100 thin lines from the top to the bottom (COP: cumulative oil production, CGP: cumulative gas production, and CWP: cumulative water production)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The average of the logarithm of horizontal permeability in the benchmark model: (a) the reference field, (b) 100 initial ensemble models, (c) results of ES with selective data, and (d) results of the proposed method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Histogram of horizontal permeability on PUNQ-S3: (a) the reference field, (b) initial ensemble model, (c) result of ES with selective data, and (d) result of the proposed method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Prediction for cumulative water production until 16.5 y: (a) ES with selective data and (b) the proposed method. The thin lines represent the result of each updated model, and the thick line stands for the reference field's performance. The thick dot lines are P10, P50, and P90 of the 100 thin lines from the top to the bottom.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In