0
Research Papers: Energy Systems Analysis

Modeling of Energy and Exergy Efficiencies of a Wind Turbine Based on the Blade Element Momentum Theory Under Different Roughness Intensities

[+] Author and Article Information
Ali Khanjari

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Shahrood University of Technology,
Shahrood 361 999 5161, Iran
e-mail: ali_khanjari69@yahoo.com

Ali Sarreshtehdari

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Shahrood University of Technology,
Shahrood 361 999 5161, Iran
e-mail: sarreshtehdari@gmail.com

Esmail Mahmoodi

Department of Mechanical Engineering
of Biosystems,
Shahrood University of Technology,
Shahrood 361 999 5161, Iran
e-mail: esmahmoodi@shahroodut.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 1, 2015; final manuscript received July 20, 2016; published online September 19, 2016. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(2), 022005 (Sep 19, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: JERT-15-1330; doi: 10.1115/1.4034640 History: Received September 01, 2015; Revised July 20, 2016

In this study, the analysis of energy and exergy of a horizontal axis wind turbine based on blade element momentum (BEM) theory is presented. The computations are validated against wind tunnel data measured in the MEXICO wind turbine experiment. Blade roughness as one of the important environmental parameters is considered in the computations. Results show that the blade element momentum (BEM) theory has good ability to predict the energy and exergy efficiencies. The computation of energy and exergy exhibits that with the increasing the roughness from 0 mm to 0.5 mm, 2324 W of the output power is reduced. Roughness of 0.5 mm at the wind speed of 16 m/s reduced exergy and energy efficiencies 5.75% and 5.83%, respectively. It is also found that the roughness in the first four months of the operation has a more negative effect on the wind turbine performance.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Fronk, B. M. , Neal, R. , and Garimella, S. , 2010, “ Evolution of the Transition to a World Driven by Renewable Energy,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 132(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Prasad, B. S. , 2010, “ Energy Efficiency, Sources and Sustainability,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 132(2), p. 020301. [CrossRef]
Dincer, I. , and Rosen, M. A. , 2007, Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development, Elsevier, Burlington, MA.
Fried, L. , 2012, “ Global Wind Statistics 2011,” G. W. E. Council , ed., GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 2–3.
Fried, L. , 2015, “ Global Wind Statistics 2014,” G. W. E. Council , ed., GWEC, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 3–4.
Mahmoodi, E. , Jafari, A. , Schaffarczyk, A. P. , Keyhani, A. , and Mahmoudi, J. , 2014, “ A New Correlation on the MEXICO Experiment Using a 3D Enhanced Blade Element Momentum Technique,” Int. J. Sustainable Energy, 33(2), pp. 448–460. [CrossRef]
Koroneos, C. , Spachos, T. , and Moussiopoulos, N. , 2003, “ Exergy Analysis of Renewable Energy Sources,” Renewable Energy, 28(2), pp. 295–310. [CrossRef]
Ozgener, O. , and Ozgener, L. , 2007, “ Exergy and Reliability Analysis of Wind Turbine Systems: A Case Study,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 11(8), pp. 1811–1826. [CrossRef]
Ozgener, O. , Ozgener, L. , and Dincer, I. , 2009, “ Analysis of Some Exergoeconomic Parameters of Small Wind Turbine System,” Int. J. Green Energy, 6(1), pp. 42–56. [CrossRef]
Baskut, O. , Ozgener, O. , and Ozgener, L. , 2011, “ Second Law Analysis of Wind Turbine Power Plants: Cesme, Izmir Example,” Energy, 36(5), pp. 2535–2542. [CrossRef]
Baskut, O. , Ozgener, O. , and Ozgener, L. , 2010, “ Effects of Meteorological Variables on Exergetic Efficiency of Wind Turbine Power Plants,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 14(9), pp. 3237–3241. [CrossRef]
Şahin, A. D. , Dincer, I. , and Rosen, M. A. , 2006, “ New Spatio-Temporal Wind Exergy Maps,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 128(3), pp. 194–202. [CrossRef]
Xydis, G. , Koroneos, C. , and Loizidou, M. , 2009, “ Exergy Analysis in a Wind Speed Prognostic Model as a Wind Farm Sitting Selection Tool: A Case Study in Southern Greece,” Appl. Energy, 86(11), pp. 2411–2420. [CrossRef]
Chowdhury, S. , Zhang, J. , Tong, W. , and Messac, A. , 2014, “ Modeling the Influence of Land-Shape on the Energy Production Potential of a Wind Farm Site,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 136(1), p. 011203. [CrossRef]
Khalfallah, M. G. , and Koliub, A. M. , 2007, “ Effect of Dust on the Performance of Wind Turbines,” Desalination, 209(1), pp. 209–220. [CrossRef]
Sagol, E. , Reggio, M. , and Ilinca, A. , 2013, “ Issues Concerning Roughness on Wind Turbine Blades,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 23, pp. 514–525. [CrossRef]
Sunden, B. , and Wu, Z. , 2015, “ On Icing and Icing Mitigation of Wind Turbine Blades in Cold Climate,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(5), pp. 51203–51210. [CrossRef]
Pope, K. , Dincer, I. , and Naterer, G. , 2010, “ Energy and Exergy Efficiency Comparison of Horizontal and Vertical Axis Wind Turbines,” Renewable Energy, 35(9), pp. 2102–2113. [CrossRef]
Schepers, J. G. , Boorsma, K. , and Snel, H. , 2010, “ IEA Task 29 MexNext: Analysis of Wind Tunnel Measurements From the EU Project Mexico,” EAWE, The Science of Making Torque From WindForth, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, pp. 169–178.
Schepers, J. G. , and Snel, H. , 2008, “ Model Experiments in Controlled Conditions,” ECN, Report No. ECN-E--07-042.
Sørensen, J. N. , 2011, “ Aerodynamic Aspects of Wind Energy Conversion,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 43(1), pp. 427–448. [CrossRef]
Glauert, H. , 1935, “ Airplane Propellers,” Aerodynamic Theory (Division L), Springer, New York.
Hansen, M. O. L. , 2008, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, Earthscan, London/Sterling, VA.
Froude, R. E. , 1889, “ On the Part Played in Propulsion by Differences of Fluid Pressure,” Trans. Inst. Nav. Archit., 30, pp. 390–405.
Froude, W. , 1878, “ On the Elementary Relation Between Pitch, Slip and Propulsive Efficiency,” Report No. NACA-TM-1. http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19930080719
Rankine, W. J. M. , 1865, “ On the Mechanical Principles of the Action of Propellers,” Trans. Inst. Nav. Archit., 6, pp. 13–39. http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/38758302?style=html
Hernandez, J. , and Crespo, A. , 1987, “ Aerodynamics Calculation of the Performance of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines and Comparison With Experimental Results,” Wind Eng., 11(4), pp. 177–187.
Moriarty, P. J. , and Hansen, A. C. , 2005, AeroDyn Theory Manual, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
Wilson, R. E. , 2009, Wind Turbine Technology: Fundamental Concepts in Wind Turbine Engineering, D. A. Spera , ed., ASME, New York.
Gupta, A. K. , 2015, “ Efficient Wind Energy Conversion: Evolution to Modern Design,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(5), p. 051201. [CrossRef]
Bluestein, M. , and Zecher, J. , 1999, “ A New Approach to an Accurate Wind Chill Factor,” Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80(9), pp. 1893–1899. [CrossRef]
Mahmoodi, E. , and Schaffarczyk, A. P. , 2012, “ Actuator Disc Modeling of the MEXICO Rotor Experiment,” EuroMech Colloquium 528, Oldenburg, Germany.
Micallef, D. , 2009, “ MEXICO Data Analysis, Stage IV—Investigation of the Limitations of BEM Codes on the Basis of the MEXICO Experiment: Version 2,” The Netherlands.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Geometry of three airfoils that use in the MEXICO wind turbine blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Normalized local chord and pitch angel in the blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Sample mesh discretization for (a) RISOA1-21, (b) NACA 64-418, and (c) DU 91-W2-250 airfoils

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Arrangement of how to analysis a blade element

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic representation of the turbine (inlet and outlet states)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Airfoil performance with variable angel of attack: (a) NACA 64-418, (b) RISOA1-21, and (c) DU 91-W2-250

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Exergy destruction for wind turbine based on experimental data at various wind velocities

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Power production of the wind turbine based on all scenarios at various wind speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Comparison of wind turbine performance based on experimental data and the BEM code at various wind velocities: (a) energy efficiency and (b) exergy efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effect of roughness on wind turbine performance at various wind velocities: (a) energy efficiency and (b) exergy efficiency

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

The ratio of power coefficient (CP) to exergy efficiency computed from computational models and experimental data at various wind speeds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Variation of power coefficient (CP) for all computational models versus power coefficient of the measurements (CPex), compared to the experimental reference (the black line)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Variation of power coefficient (CP) for the corrected computational models employing roughness versus power coefficient of the measurements (CPex), compared to the experimental reference (the black line)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In