0
Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Simultaneous Schlieren–PLIF Studies for Ignition and Soot Luminosity Visualization With Close-Coupled High-Pressure Double Injections of n-Dodecane

[+] Author and Article Information
Ahmed Abdul Moiz

MEEM,
Michigan Technological University,
R.L. Smith Building,
1400 Townsend Drive,
Houghton, MI 49931
e-mail: amoiz@mtu.edu

Khanh D. Cung

Argonne National Laboratory,
9700 S. Cass Avenue,
Argonne, IL 60439
e-mail: kcung@anl.gov

Seong-Young Lee

MEEM,
Michigan Technological University,
917 R.L. Smith Building,
1400 Townsend Drive,
Houghton, MI 49931
e-mail: sylee@mtu.edu

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received June 28, 2016; final manuscript received October 13, 2016; published online January 9, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Reza Sheikhi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(1), 012207 (Jan 09, 2017) (12 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1272; doi: 10.1115/1.4035071 History: Received June 28, 2016; Revised October 13, 2016

Studies are performed in a constant volume preburn type combustion vessel over a range of ambient temperatures (750 K, 800 K, and 900 K) at constant density (22.8 kg/m3) with 15% O2 by volume in the ambient at 1200 bar (n-dodecane) fuel injection pressure. The influence of the pilot (first) spray flame on the ignition and combustion characteristics of the main (second) injection is investigated while varying injection pressure, dwell time, and injection strategy. Simultaneous schlieren (with soot luminosity imaging) and 355 nm planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) imaging for formaldehyde (CH2O) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) visualization was performed. At both 900 K and 800 K ambient, main injection exhibits a reduction in ignition delay (ID) by a factor of 2 over their respective pilots. For the ambient temperature condition of 750 K, reducing injection pressure from 1500 bar to 1200 bar causes a significant increase in ignition delay (by ∼0.8 ms), which was attributed to the influence of injection pressure on spray-mixing and early development of cool flame. Also, at 750 K ambient condition, multiple injection schedule having two 0.5 ms injections separated by a 0.5 ms dwell was found to have a shorter ignition delay than a single 0.5 ms injection. Studies carried at an 800 K ambient show that by increasing the dwell time, main interaction with pilot reactive intermediates can be controlled to avoid an early rich ignition of the main spray and to reduce soot precursors.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Chen, S. K. , 2000, “ Simultaneous Reduction of NOx and Particulate Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Small Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
Dürnholz, M. , Endres, H. , and Frisse, P. , 1994, “ Preinjection a Measure to Optimize the Emission Behavior of DI-Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
Imaoka, Y. , Shouji, K. , Inoue, T. , and Noda, T. , 2015, “ A Study of a Multistage Injection Mechanism for Improving the Combustion of Direct-Injection Gasoline Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 8(3), pp. 1080–1087. [CrossRef]
Martin, D. , Stratmann, J. , Pischke, P. , Kneer, R. , and Lai, M.-C. , 2010, “ Experimental Investigation of the Interaction of Multiple GDI Injections Using Laser Diagnostics,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 3(1), pp. 372–388. [CrossRef]
Mendez, S. , and Thirouard, B. , 2009, “ Using Multiple Injection Strategies in Diesel Combustion: Potential to Improve Emissions, Noise and Fuel Economy Trade-Off in Low CR Engines,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr., 1(1), pp. 662–674. [CrossRef]
O'Connor, J. , and Musculus, M. , 2013, “ Optical Investigation of the Reduction of Unburned Hydrocarbons Using Close-Coupled Post Injections at LTC Conditions in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 6(1), pp. 379–399. [CrossRef]
O'Connor, J. , and Musculus, M. , 2013, “ Post Injections for Soot Reduction in Diesel Engines: A Review of Current Understanding,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 6(1), pp. 400–421. [CrossRef]
O'Connor, J. , and Musculus, M. , 2014, “ In-Cylinder Mechanisms of Soot Reduction by Close-Coupled Post-Injections as Revealed by Imaging of Soot Luminosity and Planar Laser-Induced Soot Incandescence in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 7(2), pp. 673–693. [CrossRef]
Tow, T. , Pierpont, D. , and Reitz, R. D. , 1994, “ Reducing Particulate and NOx Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Heavy Duty DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
Yousefi, A. , and Birouk, M. , 2016, “ An Investigation of Multi-Injection Strategies for a Dual-Fuel Pilot Diesel Ignition Engine at Low Load,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 139(1), p. 012201. [CrossRef]
Said, A. O. , Khalil, A. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2016, “ Dual-Location Fuel Injection Effects on Emissions and NO*/OH* Chemiluminescence in a High Intensity Combustor,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 138(4), p. 042208. [CrossRef]
Khalil, A. E. , and Gupta, A. K. , 2014, “ Dual Injection Distributed Combustion for Gas Turbine Application,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 136(1), p. 011601. [CrossRef]
Ehleskog, R. , Ochoterena, R. L. , and Andersson, S. , 2007, “ Effects of Multiple Injections on Engine-Out Emission Levels Including Particulate Mass From an HSDI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
Lee, J. , Hong, K. , Choi, S. , Yu, S. , Choi, H. , and Min, K. , 2013, “ Comparison of the Effects of Multiple Injection Strategy on the Emissions Between Moderate and Heavy EGR Rate Conditions—Part 1: Pilot Injections,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 27(4), pp. 1135–1141. [CrossRef]
Bruneaux, G. , and Maligne, D. , 2009, “ Study of the Mixing and Combustion Processes of Consecutive Short Double Diesel Injections,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 2(1), pp. 1151–1169. [CrossRef]
Pickett, L. M. , Kook, S. , and Williams, T. C. , 2009, “ Transient Liquid Penetration of Early-Injection Diesel Sprays,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 2(1), pp. 785–804. [CrossRef]
Skeen, S. , Manin, J. , and Pickett, L. M. , 2015, “ Visualization of Ignition Processes in High-Pressure Sprays With Multiple Injections of n-Dodecane,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 8(2), pp. 696–715. [CrossRef]
Cung, K. , Moiz, A. , Johnson, J. , Lee, S.-Y. , Kweon, C.-B. , and Montanaro, A. , 2015, “ Spray–Combustion Interaction Mechanism of Multiple-Injection Under Diesel Engine Conditions,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 35(3), pp. 3061–3068. [CrossRef]
Pickett, L. M. , Kook, S. , and Williams, T. C. , 2009, “ Visualization of Diesel Spray Penetration, Cool-Flame, Ignition, High-Temperature Combustion, and Soot Formation Using High-Speed Imaging,” SAE Int. J. Engines, 2(1), pp. 439–459. [CrossRef]
Naber, J. D. , and Siebers, D. L. , 1996, “ Effects of Gas Density and Vaporization on Penetration and Dispersion of Diesel Sprays,” SAE Technical Paper 960034.
Espey, C. , Dec, J. E. , Litzinger, T. A. , and Santavicca, D. A. , 1997, “ Planar Laser Rayleigh Scattering for Quantitative Vapor-Fuel Imaging in a Diesel Jet,” Combust. Flame, 109(1), pp. 65–86. [CrossRef]
Higgins, B. , Siebers, D. L. , and Aradi, A. , 2000, “ Diesel-Spray Ignition and Premixed-Burn Behavior,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
Siebers, D. L. , and Higgins, B. , 2001, “ Flame Lift-Off on Direct-Injection Diesel Sprays Under Quiescent Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 0148-7191.
Skeen, S. A. , Manin, J. , and Pickett, L. M. , 2015, “ Simultaneous Formaldehyde PLIF and High-Speed Schlieren Imaging for Ignition Visualization in High-Pressure Spray Flames,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 35(3), pp. 3167–3174. [CrossRef]
Musculus, M. P. , and Pickett, L. M. , 2005, “ Diagnostic Considerations for Optical Laser-Extinction Measurements of Soot in High-Pressure Transient Combustion Environments,” Combust. Flame, 141(4), pp. 371–391. [CrossRef]
Meijer, M. , Somers, B. , Johnson, J. , Naber, J. , Lee, S.-Y. , Malbec, L. M. , Bruneaux, G. , Pickett, L. M. , Bardi, M. , and Payri, R. , 2012, “ Engine Combustion Network (ECN): Characterization and Comparison of Boundary Conditions for Different Combustion Vessels,” Atomization Sprays, 22(9), pp. 777–806. [CrossRef]
Nesbitt, J. E. , Johnson, S. E. , Pickett, L. M. , Siebers, D. L. , Lee, S.-Y. , and Naber, J. D. , 2011, “ Minor Species Production From Lean Premixed Combustion and Their Impact on Autoignition of Diesel Surrogates,” Energy Fuels, 25(3), pp. 926–936. [CrossRef]
Juli, J. , 2002, “ Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence Fuel Concentration Measurements in Isothermal Diesel Sprays,” Opt. Express, 10(7), pp. 309–323. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lachaux, T. , and Musculus, M. P. , 2007, “ In-Cylinder Unburned Hydrocarbon Visualization During Low-Temperature Compression-Ignition Engine Combustion Using Formaldehyde PLIF,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 31(2), pp. 2921–2929. [CrossRef]
Bruneaux, G. , 2008, “ Combustion Structure of Free and Wall-Impinging Diesel Jets by Simultaneous Laser-Induced Fluorescence of Formaldehyde, Poly-Aromatic Hydrocarbons, and Hydroxides,” Int. J. Engine Res., 9(3), pp. 249–265. [CrossRef]
Heywood, J. B. , 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Knox, B. W. , and Genzale, C. L. , 2015, “ Reduced-Order Numerical Model for Transient Reacting Diesel Sprays With Detailed Kinetics,” Int. J. Engine Res., 17(3), pp. 261–279. [CrossRef]
Nesbitt, J. E. , Lee, S.-Y. , Naber, J. D. , and Arora, R. , 2010, “ An Optical Study of Spark Ignition and Flame Kernel Development Near the Lean Limit at Elevated Pressure,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2010-35136.
Felsch, C. , Gauding, M. , Hasse, C. , Vogel, S. , and Peters, N. , 2009, “ An Extended Flamelet Model for Multiple Injections in DI Diesel Engines,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 32(2), pp. 2775–2783. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Optical setup for simultaneous imaging of schlieren and PLIF diagnostics. Labels are as follows: 1—LED light source, 2—pin-hole aperture, 3 and 8—parabolic reflector, 4—50/50 beam splitter, 5—combustion vessel, 6—injector, 7—reflecting mirror, 9—schlieren stop, 10—high-speed camera, 11—Nd:YAG laser, 12—dichroic mirror, 13—spherical and cylindrical lens, 14—laser sheet, 15—laser power mirror, and 16—I-CCD camera.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Rate of injection profile for 1200 bar injection for the 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection sequence

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Nonreacting spray penetration results with single 0.5 ms injection and double 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection for three ambient temperature cases (900 K, 800 K, and 750 K) at injection pressure of 1500 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Heat-release rate profiles for the different ambient temperature cases for the 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection sequence at 1200 bar injection pressure. The actual injection durations are highlighted in the time axis.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Heat-release rate profiles for three individual runs for the 900 K ambient temperature case at 1200 bar injection pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Raw schlieren images for the 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection event at 900 K (left), 800 K (middle), and 750 K (right). White-dashed structures indicate schlieren softening and sold white lines indicate luminosity events.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Simultaneous PLIF imaging of the 0.5/0.5/0.5ms spray combustion event at 1200 bar for the 900 K (left) and 800 K (right) ambient case; dotted-thin contour line denotes schlieren boundaries, solid-thick contour line denotes soot luminosity, and background image is a PLIF image for formaldehyde measurement. Figure available in color online.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Soot luminosity images of 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection sequence for the 900 K ambient (left) and 800 K ambient (right) at 1200 bar injection pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Simultaneous PLIF imaging of the 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection spray combustion event at 1200 bar (left) and 1500 bar (right) injection pressure for a 750 K ambient. Figure available in color online.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Heat-release rate comparison of the 1200 bar and 1500 bar injection pressure cases of the 0.5/0.5/0.5 ms injection event at the 750 K ambient temperature case. The actual injection durations are highlighted in the time axis.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Schematic of PLIF shot timing in the dwell time variation tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Heat-release rate profiles of the injection sequences with varying dwell times at 800 K. A star symbol on each curve indicates the timing of the PLIF shot acquisition.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Simultaneous PLIF imaging for a 0.5/0.3/0.5 ms injection sequence. Image is acquired at ∼880 μs ASOI. Figure available in color online.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Simultaneous PLIF imaging for a 0.5/0.6/0.5 ms injection sequence. Image is acquired at ∼1180 μs ASOI. Figure available in color online.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Simultaneous PLIF imaging for a 0.5/0.9/0.5 ms injection sequence. Image is acquired at ∼1480 μs ASOI. Figure available in color online.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Soot luminosity images for three injection sequences: 0.5/0.3/0.5 ms, 0.5/0.6/0.5 ms, and 0.5/0.9/0.5 ms, for a set of fixed after start of main injection (ASMI) times at 1800 K ambient and 1200 bar injection pressure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Heat-release profiles for limited variations in injection sequence and injection pressure at 750 K ambient temperature. Figure available in color online.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In