Research Papers: Fuel Combustion

Efficacy of Add-On Hydrous Ethanol Dual Fuel Systems to Reduce NOx Emissions From Diesel Engines

[+] Author and Article Information
Jeffrey T. Hwang

Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
111 Church Street SE,
Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: hwang183@umn.edu

Alex J. Nord

Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
111 Church Street SE,
Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: nord0537@umn.edu

William F. Northrop

Mechanical Engineering,
University of Minnesota,
111 Church Street SE,
Minneapolis, MN 55455
e-mail: wnorthro@umn.edu

Contributed by the Internal Combustion Engine Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received February 13, 2017; final manuscript received February 27, 2017; published online March 30, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Stephen A. Ciatti.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(4), 042206 (Mar 30, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: JERT-17-1072; doi: 10.1115/1.4036252 History: Received February 13, 2017; Revised February 27, 2017

Aftermarket dual-fuel injection systems using a variety of different fumigants have been proposed as alternatives to expensive after-treatment to control NOx emissions from legacy diesel engines. However, our previous work has shown that available add-on systems using hydrous ethanol as the fumigant achieve only minor benefits in emissions without recalibration of the diesel fuel injection strategy. This study experimentally re-evaluates a novel aftermarket dual-fuel port fuel injection (PFI) system used in our previous work, with the addition of higher flow injectors to increase the fumigant energy fraction (FEF), defined as the ratio of energy provided by the hydrous ethanol on a lower heating value (LHV) basis to overall fuel energy. Results of this study confirm our earlier findings that as FEF increases, NO emissions decrease, while NO2 and unburned ethanol emissions increase, leading to no change in overall NOx. Peak cylinder pressure and apparent rates of heat release are not strongly dependent on FEF, indicating that in-cylinder NO formation rates by the Zel'dovich mechanism remain the same. Through single zone modeling, we show the feasibility of in-cylinder NO conversion to NO2 aided by unburned ethanol. The modeling results indicate that NO to NO2 conversion occurs during the early expansion stroke where bulk gases have temperature in the range of 1150–1250 K. This work conclusively proves that aftermarket dual fuel systems for fixed calibration diesel engines cannot reduce NOx emissions without lowering peak temperature during diffusive combustion responsible for forming NO in the first place.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


EPA, 2013, “ Nonroad Compression-Ignition Engines—Exhaust Emissions Standards,” US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, accessed Mar. 22, 2017, http://www.epa.gov/otaq/standards/nonroad/nonroadci. htm
Olson, A. L. , 2010, “ The Effect of Ethanol-Water Fumigation on the Performance and Emissions From a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine,” M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Bowman, C. T. , 1992, “ Control of Combustion-Generated Nitrogen Oxide Emissions: Technology Driven by Regulation,” Symp. Combust., 24(1), pp. 859–878. [CrossRef]
Lilik, G. K. , Zhang, H. , Herreros, J. M. , Haworth, D. C. , and Boehman, A. L. , 2010, “ Hydrogen Assisted Diesel Combustion,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35(9), pp. 4382–4398. [CrossRef]
Lavoie, G. A. , Heywood, J. B. , and Keck, J. C. , 1970, “ Experimental and Theoretical Study of Nitric Oxide Formation in Internal Combustion Engines,” Combust. Sci. Technol., 1(4), pp. 313–326. [CrossRef]
Dempsey, A. B., Viswanathan, S., Das Adhikary B., and Reitz R. D., 2011, “ Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Using Premixed Hydrated Ethanol and Direct Injection Diesel,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2011-60235.
Splitter, D. , Hanson, R. , Kokjohn, S. L. , and Reitz, R. D. , 2011, “ Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Heavy-Duty Engine Operation at Mid-and High-Loads With Conventional and Alternative Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2011-01-0363.
Reitz, R. D. , and Duraisamy, G. , 2015, “ Review of High Efficiency and Clean Reactivity Controlled Compression Ignition (RCCI) Combustion in Internal Combustion Engines,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 46, pp. 12–71. [CrossRef]
Fang, W. , Huang, B. , Kittelson, D. B. , and Northrop, W. F. , 2012, “ Dual-Fuel Diesel Engine Combustion With Hydrogen, Gasoline, and Ethanol Fumigants: Effect of Diesel Injection Timing,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2012-92142.
El-Hagar, M. M. E. , 2014, “ Exhaust Emissions of a Single Cylinder Diesel Engine With Addition of Ethanol,” Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Res., 3(1), pp. 74–81.
Rahman, M. M. , Stevanovic, S. , Brown, R. J. , and Ristovski, Z. , 2013, “ Influence of Different Alternative Fuels on Particle Emission From a Turbocharged Common-Rail Diesel Engine,” Proc. Eng., 56, pp. 381–386. [CrossRef]
Cheng, C. H. , Cheung, C. S. , Chan, T. L. , Lee, S. C. , and Yao, C. D. , 2008, “ Experimental Investigation on the Performance, Gaseous and Particulate Emissions of a Methanol Fumigated Diesel Engine,” Sci. Total Environ., 389(1), pp. 115–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Imran, A. , Varman, M. , Masjuki, H. H. , and Kalam, M. A. , 2013, “ Review on Alcohol Fumigation on Diesel Engine: A Viable Alternative Dual Fuel Technology for Satisfactory Engine Performance and Reduction of Environment Concerning Emission,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 26, pp. 739–751. [CrossRef]
Surawski, N. C. , Ristovski, Z. D. , Brown, R. J. , and Situ, R. , 2012, “ Gaseous and Particle Emissions From an Ethanol Fumigated Compression Ignition Engine,” Energy Convers. Manage., 54(1), pp. 145–151. [CrossRef]
EPA, 2011, “ Regulation to Reduce Emissions of Diesel Particulate Matter, Oxides of Nitrogen and Other Criteria Pollutants From In-Use Heavy-Duty Diesel-Fueled Vehicles,” US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Hwang, J. T. , and Northrop, W. F. , 2014, “ Gas and Particle Emissions From a Diesel Engine Operating in a Dual-Fuel Mode Using High Water Content Hydrous Ethanol,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2014-5460.
Papagiannakis, R. G. , and Hountalas, D. T. , 2004, “ Combustion and Exhaust Emission Characteristics of a Dual Fuel Compression Ignition Engine Operated With Pilot Diesel Fuel and Natural Gas,” Energy Convers. Manage., 45(18–19), pp. 2971–2987. [CrossRef]
Alperstein, M. , Swim, W. B. , and Schweitzer, P. H. , 1957, “ Fumigation Kills Smoke Improves Diesel,” SAE Technical Paper No. 580058.
Chaplin, J. , and Binjanius, R. , 1987, “ Ethanol Fumigation of a Compression-Ignition Engine Using Advanced Injection of Diesel Fuel,” Trans. ASAE, 30(3), pp. 610–614. [CrossRef]
Nord, A. J. , Hwang, J. T. , and Northrop, W. F. , 2015, “ Emissions From a Diesel Engine Operating in a Dual-Fuel Mode Using Port-Fuel Injection of Heated Hydrous Ethanol,” ASME Paper No. ICEF2015-1067.
Soloiu, V. , Muinos, M. , and Harp, S. , 2015, “ Investigation of Dual Fuel PCCI (PFI of N-Butanol and DI-ULSD) Compared With DI of Binary Mixtures of the Same Fuels in an Omnivorous Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2015-01-0857.
Morsy, M. H. , 2015, “ Assessment of a Direct Injection Diesel Engine Fumigated With Ethanol/Water Mixtures,” Energy Convers. Manage., 94, pp. 406–414. [CrossRef]
Greeves, G. , Khan, I. M. , and Onion, G. , 1977, “ Effects of Water Introduction on Diesel Engine Combustion and Emissions,” Symp. Combust., 16(1), pp. 321–336. [CrossRef]
Hori, M. , Matsunaga, N. , Marinov, N. , William, P. , and Charles, W. , 1998, “ An Experimental and Kinetic Calculation of the Promotion Effect of Hydrocarbons on the NO–NO2 Conversion in a Flow Reactor,” Symp. Combust., 27(1), pp. 389–396. [CrossRef]
Heywood, J. B. , 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, Vol. 21, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Saffy, H. A. , Northrop, W. F. , Kittelson, D. B. , and Boies, A. M. , 2015, “ Energy, Carbon Dioxide and Water Use Implications of Hydrous Ethanol Production,” Energy Convers. Manage., 105, pp. 900–907. [CrossRef]
ISO, 2007, “ Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines–Exhaust Emission Measurement–Part 4: Steady-State Test Cycles for Different Engine Applications,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 8178-4.
Figliola, R. , and Beasley, D. , 2000, Theory and Design for Mechanical Measurements, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York.
Northrop, W. F. , Fang, W. , and Huang, B. , 2013, “ Combustion Phasing Effect on Cycle Efficiency of a Diesel Engine Using Advanced Gasoline Fumigation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(3), p. 32801. [CrossRef]
Bika, A., Franklin, L., and Kittelson, D., 2009, “ Hydrogen as a Combustion Modifier of Ethanol in Compression Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2814.
Can, Ö. , Çelikten, İ. , and Usta, N. , 2004, “ Effects of Ethanol Addition on Performance and Emissions of a Turbocharged Indirect Injection Diesel Engine Running at Different Injection Pressures,” Energy Convers. Manage., 45(15–16), pp. 2429–2440. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Diagram of engine test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

In-cylinder pressure traces and apparent RoHR for mode 3 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Brake specific CO emissions as a function of FEF for 160 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Selected HC emissions on a brake-specific basis as a function of FEF for 160 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol at mode3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Brake specific unburned ethanol emissions as a function of FEF for 160 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Soot concentration as a function of FEF for 160 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Brake specific NO emissions as a function of FEF for 160 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Brake specific NOx emissions as a function of FEF for 160 and 180 proof hydrous ethanol

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

NO2/NOx ratio as a function of unburned ethanol for all modes and ethanol proofs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

NO2/NOx ratio as a function of reaction temperature for selected HCs using a constant pressure reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Apparent RoHR, in-cylinder pressure, mean in-cylinder temperature, and CA90 temperature range as a function of CAD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

NO conversion trajectory as a function of CAD starting at CA90

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

NO2/NOX contour as a function of local in-cylinder temperatures at CA90 and normalized unburned ethanol concentrations




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In