0
Research Papers: Energy Systems Analysis

Cooling of Turbine Blades With Expanded Exit Holes: Computational Analyses of Leading Edge and Pressure-Side of a Turbine Blade

[+] Author and Article Information
Fariborz Forghan, Uichiro Narusawa, Hameed Metghalchi

Department of Mechanical and
Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115

Omid Askari

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Mississippi State University,
Starkville, MS 39762

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received December 14, 2016; final manuscript received December 26, 2016; published online March 8, 2017. Special Editor: Reza Sheikhi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(4), 042004 (Mar 08, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1508; doi: 10.1115/1.4035829 History: Received December 14, 2016; Revised December 26, 2016

Turbine blades are cooled by a jet flow from expanded exit holes (EEH) forming a low-temperature film over the blade surface. Subsequent to our report on the suction-side (low-pressure, high-speed region), computational analyses are performed to examine the cooling effectiveness of the flow from EEH located at the leading edge as well as at the pressure-side (high-pressure, low-speed region). Unlike the case of the suction-side, the flow through EEH on the pressure-side is either subsonic or transonic with a weak shock front. The cooling effectiveness, η (defined as the temperature difference between the hot gas and the blade surface as a fraction of that between the hot gas and the cooling jet), is higher than the suction-side along the surface near the exit of EEH. However, its magnitude declines sharply with an increase in the distance from EEH. Significant effects on the magnitude of η are observed and discussed in detail of (1) the coolant mass flow rate (0.001, 0.002, and 0.004 (kg/s)), (2) EEH configurations at the leading edge (vertical EEH at the stagnation point, 50 deg into the leading-edge suction-side, and 50 deg into the leading-edge pressure-side), (3) EEH configurations in the midregion of the pressure-side (90 deg (perpendicular to the mainstream flow), 30 deg EEH tilt toward upstream, and 30 deg tilt toward downstream), and (4) the inclination angle of EEH.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Goldstein, R. J. , 1971, Film Cooling, Advances in Heat Transfer, Vol. 7, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 321–379.
Goldstein, R. J. , Eckert, E. R. G. , and Burggarf, F. , 1974, “ Effect of Hole Geometry and Density on Three Dimensional Film Cooling,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 17(5), pp. 595–607. [CrossRef]
Lopez-Pena, F. , and Arts, T. , 1993, “ On the Development of a Film Cooling Layer,” Heat Transfer and Cooling in Gas Turbines, Vol. 36, Paper No. AGARD-CP-527.
Thole, K. , Gritsch, M. , Schultz, A. , and Wittig, S. , 1996, “ Flow Field Measurements for Film Cooling Holes With Expanded Exits,” ASME Paper No. 96-GT-174.
Hildebrandt, T. , Ganzert, W. , and Fottner, L. , 2000, “ Systematic Experimental and Numerical Investigations on the Aerothermodynamics of a Film Cooled Turbine Cascade With Variation of the Cooling Hole Shape: Part II—Numerical Approach,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0298.
Barthet, S. , and Bario, F. , 2001, “ Experimental Investigation of Film Cooling Flow Induced by Shaped Holes on a Turbine Blade,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 934, pp. 313–320. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Bell, C. M. , Hamakawa, H. , and Ligrani, P. M. , 2000, “ Film Cooling From Shaped Holes,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 122(2), pp. 224–232. [CrossRef]
Guo, S. M. , Lai, C. C. , Jones, T. V. , Lock, G. D. , and Rawlinson, A. J. , 1998, “ The Application of Thin-Film Technology to Measure Turbine-Vane Heat Transfer and Effectiveness in a Film-Cooled, Engine-Simulated Environment,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 19(6), pp. 594–600. [CrossRef]
Sargison, J. E. , Guo, S. M. , Oldfield, M. L. G. , and Lock, G. D. , 2002, “ A Converging Slot Hole Film Cooling Geometry—Part 1: Low-Speed Flat-Plate Heat Transfer and Loss,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(3), pp. 453–460. [CrossRef]
Bohn, D. , Ren, J. , and Kusterer, K. , 2003, “ Conjugate Heat Transfer Analysis for Film Cooling Configurations With Different Hole Geometries,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38369.
Gritsch, M. , Schultz, A. , and Wittig, S. , 1998, “ Heat Transfer Coefficients Measurement of Film-Cooling With Expanded Exits,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-028.
Yu, Y. , Yen, C.-H. , Shih, T. I.-P. , Chyu, M. K. , and Gogineni, S. , 1999, “ Film Cooling Effectiveness and Heat Transfer Coefficient Distributions Around Diffusion Shaped Holes,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 124(5), pp. 820–827.
Wilfert, G. , and Fottner, L. , 1996, “ The Aerodynamic Mixing Effect of Discrete Cooling Jet With Mainstream Flow on a Highly Loaded Turbine Blade,” ASME J. Turbomach., 118(3), pp. 468–478. [CrossRef]
Haven, B. A. , Yamagata, D. K. , Kurosaka, M. , Yamawaki, S. , and Maya, T. , 1997, “ Anti-Kidney Pair of Vortices in Shaped Holes and Their Influence on Film Cooling Effectiveness,” ASME Paper No. 97-GT-045.
Saumweber, C. , Schultz, A. , and Witting, S. , 2003, “ Free-Stream Turbulence Effect on Film Cooling With Shaped Holes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(1), pp. 65–73. [CrossRef]
Baheri-Islami, S. , and Jubran, B. A. , 2012, “ The Effect of Turbulence Intensity on Film Cooling of Gas Turbine Blade From Trenched Shaped Holes,” J. Heat Mass Transfer, 48(5), pp. 831–840. [CrossRef]
Kohli, A. , and Thole, K. A. , 1998, “ Entrance Effects on Diffused Film Cooling Holes,” ASME Paper No. 98-GT-402.
Makki, Y. H. , and Jakubowski, G. S. , 1986, “ An Experimental Study of Film Cooling From Diffused Trapezoidal Shaped Holes,” AIAA Paper No. 1986-1326.
Sargison, J. E. , Guo, S. M. , Oldfield, M. L. G. , and Lock, G. D. , 2002, “ A Converging Slot Hole Film Cooling Geometry—Part 2: Transonic Nozzle Guide Vane Heat Transfer and Loss,” ASME J. Turbomach., 124(3), pp. 461–471. [CrossRef]
Sargison, J. E. , Oldfield, M. L. G. , Guo, S. M. , Lock, G. D. , and Rawlinson, A. J. , 2005, “ Flow Visualization of the External Flow From a Converging Slot-Hole Film Cooling Geometry,” Exp. Fluid, 38(3), pp. 304–318. [CrossRef]
Azzi, A. , and Jubran, B. A. , 2007, “ Numerical Modelling of Film Cooling From Converging Slot-Hole,” Heat Mass Transfer, 43(4), pp. 381–388. [CrossRef]
Liu, C. L. , Zhu, H. R. , Bai, J. T. , and Xu, D. C. , 2010, “ Film Cooling Performance of Converging Slot-Hole Rows on a Gas Turbine Blade,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(23–24), pp. 5232–5241. [CrossRef]
Liu, C. L. , Zhu, H. R. , Bai, J. T. , and Xu, D. C. , 2009, “ Experimental Research on the Thermal Performance of Converging Slot Holes With Different Divergence Angles,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 33(5), pp. 808–817. [CrossRef]
Schmidt, D. L. , Sen, B. , and Bogard, D. G. , 1994, “ Film Cooling With Compound Angle Holes: Adiabatic Effectiveness,” ASME Paper No. 94-GT-312.
Chen, P. H. , Hung, M. S. , and Ding, P. P. , 2001, “ Film Cooling Performance on Curved Walls With Compound Angle Hole Configuration,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 934(1), pp. 353–360. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Dittmar, J. , Schultz, A. , and Wittig, S. , 2002, “ Assessment of Various Film-Cooling Configurations Including Shaped and Compound Angle Holes Based on Large-Scale Experiments,” ASME J. Turbomach., 125(1), pp. 57–64.
McGrath, E. L. , Leylek, J. H. , and Buck, F. A. , 2002, “ Film Cooling on a Modern HP Turbine Blade—Part IV: Compound Angle Shaped Holes,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30521.
Liu, C. L. , Zhu, H. R. , Zhang, X. , Xu, D. C. , and Zhang, Z. W. , 2014, “ Experimental Investigation on the Leading Edge Film Cooling of Cylindrical and Laid-Back Holes With Different Radial Angles,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 71, pp. 615–625. [CrossRef]
Baheri-Islami, S. , Alavi-Tabrizi, S. P. , Jubran, B. A. , and Esmaeilzadeh, E. , 2010, “ Influence of Trenched Shaped Holes on Turbine Blade Leading Edge Film Cooling,” Heat Transfer Eng., 31(10), pp. 889–906. [CrossRef]
Ganzert, W. , Hildebrandt, T. , and Fottner, L. , 2000, “ Systematic Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Aerodynamics of a Film Cooled Turbine Cascade With Variation of the Cooling Shape—Part 1: Experimental Approach,” ASME Paper No. 2000-GT-0295.
Salvadori, S. , Montomoli, F. , and Martelli, F. , 2013, “ Film-Cooling Performance in Supersonic Flows: Effect of Shock Impingement,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part A, 227(3), pp. 295–305. [CrossRef]
Yu, Z. L. , Xu, T. , Li, J. L. , Ma, L. , and Xu, T. Z. , 2013, “ Comparison of a Series of Double Chamber Model With Various Hole Angles for Enhancing Cooling Effectiveness,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 44, pp. 38–44. [CrossRef]
Yao, Y. , Zhang, J. Z. , and Wang, L. P. , 2013, “ Film Cooling on a Gas Turbine Blade Suction Side With Converging Slot-Hole,” Int. J. Therm. Sci., 65, pp. 267–279. [CrossRef]
Yu, Y. , Jing-Zhou, Z. , and Xiao-Ming, T. , 2014, “ Numerical Study of Film Cooling From Converging Slot-Hole on a Gas Turbine Blade Suction Side,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 52, pp. 61–72. [CrossRef]
Yusop, N. M. , Ali, A. H. , and Abdullah, M. Z. , 2013, “ Computational Study of a New Scheme for a Film-Cooling Hole on Convex Surface of Turbine Blades,” Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 43, pp. 90–99. [CrossRef]
Hay, N. , and Lampard, D. , 1998, “ Discharge Coefficient of Turbine Cooling Holes: A Review,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120(2), pp. 317–319. [CrossRef]
Gritsch, M. , Schulz, A. , and Wittig, S. , 1998, “ Discharge Coefficient Measurements of Film-Cooling Holes With Expanded Exits,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120(3), pp. 557–563. [CrossRef]
Lutum, E. , and Johnson, B. V. , 1999, “ Influence of the Hole Length-to-Diameter Ratio on Film Cooling With Cylindrical Holes,” ASME J. Turbomach., 121(2), pp. 209–216. [CrossRef]
Jocksch, A. , 2004, “ Effect of the Vortex Whistle on the Discharge Coefficient of Orifices,” AIAA J., 42(5), pp. 1048–1050. [CrossRef]
Gritsch, M. , Schulz, A. , and Wittig, S. , 1998, “ Adiabatic Wall Effectiveness Measurements of Film-Cooling Holes With Expanded Exits,” ASME J. Turbomach., 120(3), pp. 549–556. [CrossRef]
Uzol, O. , Camci, C. , and Glezer, B. , 2001, “ Aerodynamic Loss Characteristics of a Turbine Blade With Trailing Edge Coolant Ejection—Part 1: Effect of Cut-Back Length, Spanwise Rib Spacing, Free-Stream Reynolds Number, and Chordwise Rib Length on Discharge Coefficients,” ASME J. Turbomach., 123(2), pp. 238–248. [CrossRef]
Zuniga, H. , Krishnan, V. , Ling, J. , and Kapat, J. , 2007, “ Trend in Film Cooling Effectiveness Caused by Increasing Angle of Diffusion Through a Row of Conical Holes,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-28287.
Forghan, F. , 1995, “ Discharge Coefficient of Diffusion Holes,” AIAA Paper No. 95-3622.
Forghan, F. , Narusawa, U. , and Metghalchi, M. , 2010, “ Discharge Coefficient of Expanded Exit Holes for Film Cooling of Turbine Blades,” AIAA J. Propul. Power, 26(6), pp. 1322–1325. [CrossRef]
Forghan, F. , Askari, O. , Narusawa, U. , and Metghalchi, H. , 2014, “ Film Cooling of Turbine Blade Surface With Extended Exit Holes,” ASME Paper No. ES2014-6527.
Forghan, F. , Askari, O. , Narusawa, U. , and Metghalchi, H. , 2014, “ Cooling of Turbine Blade Surface With Extended Exit Holes: Parametric Study,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2014-36912.
Forghan, F. , Askari, O. , Narusawa, U. , and Metghalchi, H. , 2016, “ Cooling of Turbine Blade Surface With Expanded Exit Holes: Computational Suction-Side Analysis,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 138(5), p. 051602. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Blade cross section at the midplane, hole angle of 90 deg from the blade surface on the pressure-side

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

η (cooling effectiveness) versus S/Dt (distance from the edge of EEH, normalized with respect to EEH throat (minimum) diameter). Filled triangle experiment from Ref. [22] and solid curve—this study. (Reproduced with permission from Forghan et al. [47]. Copyright 2016 by ASME).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Profiles around EEH at the leading-edge stagnation point (EEH axis normal to the blade surface): (a) temperature with  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (b) the Mach number with  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (c) η versus S/Dt (right dotted—pressure-side, left solid—suction-side, bottom curves for  = 10−3 (kg/s), middle curves for 2 × 10−3 (kg/s), and top curves for 4 × 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Profiles around EEH at the leading-edge suction-side: (a) temperature,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (b) the Mach number,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), and (c) η versus S/Dt (right dotted—pressure-side, left solid—suction-side, bottom curves for  = 10−3 (kg/s), middle curves for 2 × 10−3 (kg/s), and top curves for 4 × 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Profiles around EEH at the leading-edge pressure-side: (a) temperature,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (b) the Mach number,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), and (c) η versus S/Dt (right dotted—pressure-side, left solid—suction-side, bottom curves for  = 10−3 (kg/s), middle curves for 2 × 10−3 (kg/s), and top curves for 4 × 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Profiles around EEH at pressure-side central region, φ = 90 deg: (a) temperature,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (b) the Mach number,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), and (c) η versus S/Dt (right dotted—pressure-side, left solid—suction-side, bottom curves for  = 10−3 (kg/s), middle curves for 2 × 10−3 (kg/s), and top curves for 4 × 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Profiles around EEH at pressure-side central region, φ = 120 deg: (a) temperature,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (b) the Mach number,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), and (c) η versus S/Dt (right dotted—pressure-side, left solid—suction-side, bottom curves for  = 10−3 (kg/s), middle curves for 2 × 10−3 (kg/s), and top curves for 4 × 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Profiles around EEH at pressure-side central region, φ = 60 deg: (a) temperature,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), (b) the Mach number,  = 4 × 10−3 (kg/s), and (c) η versus S/Dt (right dotted—pressure-side, left solid—suction-side, bottom curves for  = 10−3 (kg/s), middle curves for 2 × 10−3 (kg/s), and top curves for 4 × 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Temperature profile around EEH at the pressure-side, showing the hot mainstream gas penetrating into EEH due to low coolant flow ( = 10−3 (kg/s))

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Temperature profile of the pressure-side EEH 30 deg to the right: (a) coolant flow rate = 0.002 (kg/s) and (b) coolant flow rate = 0.001 (kg/s)

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In