Research Papers: Alternative Energy Sources

Shape Morphing Mechanism for Improving Wind Turbines Performance

[+] Author and Article Information
Jesus Alejandro Franco

Universidad Autonoma de Queretaro,
Cerro de las Campanas S/N,
Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro,
e-mail: jfranco15@alumnos.uaq.mx

Juan Carlos Jauregui

Universidad Autonoma de Querétaro,
Cerro de las Campanas S/N,
Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro,
e-mail: jc.jauregui@uaq.mx

Andres Carbajal

Universidad Autonoma de Querétaro,
Cerro de las Campanas S/N,
Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro,
e-mail: acarbajaldi@gmail.com

Manuel Toledano-Ayala

Universidad Autonoma de Querétaro,
Cerro de las Campanas S/N,
Santiago de Querétaro 76010, Querétaro,
e-mail: toledano@uaq.mx

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 7, 2016; final manuscript received April 29, 2017; published online June 8, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Bengt Sunden.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(5), 051214 (Jun 08, 2017) (13 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1450; doi: 10.1115/1.4036724 History: Received November 07, 2016; Revised April 29, 2017

Wind energy technology is facing new challenges due to the increment in rotor diameter. Nowadays, several studies focus on the development of new flow control methods for load alleviation, in order to increase the lifetime of the blades. This paper describes a shape morphing-based method for smart blades. The study includes an aerodynamic model with a computational search algorithm to find the optimal Cp. A section with shape morphing technology was developed to prove the performance of the method. The smart blade prototype section incorporates a novel structure with a flexible skin and a compliant mechanism. This deformable structure achieves the required displacements for different NACA profiles through camber morphing. In this way, the efficiency and the load variations are improved. The compliant mechanism has to be as light as possible and it has to be competitive in cost. In order to achieve these limitations, different actuating mechanisms were evaluated. Among different possibilities, servo actuators presented higher load/weight capabilities and the required displacement ratios to cover the entire deformable range. The airfoil is modified according to the wind condition and the wind speed is the input variable for controlling the actuators displacement. The control algorithm has a very high frequency response; in this way, the blade profile can be modified in a shorter time and it can respond to high wind velocity variations. Therefore, a deformable section improves the overall performance of wind turbines since it increases power and extends the lifetime of the blades.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Hansen, M. O. L. , 2008, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, 2nd ed., Earthscan, London.
Zhang, D. , Cross, P. , Ma, X. , and Li, W. , 2013, “ Improved Control of Individual Blade Pitch for Wind Turbines,” Sens. Actuators A, 198, pp. 8–14. [CrossRef]
Larsen, T. , Madson, H. , and Thomson, K. , 2005, “ Active Load Reduction Using Individual Pitch, Based on Local Blade Flow Measurements,” Wind Energy, 8(1), pp. 67–80. [CrossRef]
Hassan, H. M. , ElShafei, A. L. , Farag, W. A. , and Saad, M. S. , 2012, “ A Robust LMI-Based Pitch Controller for Large Wind Turbines,” Renewable Energy, 44, p. 63e71. [CrossRef]
Muljadi, E. , 2001, “ Pitch-Controlled Variable-Speed Wind Turbine Generation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 37(1), pp. 240–246. [CrossRef]
Bjørn, P. , 2010, “ Advanced Load Alleviation for Wind Turbines Using Adaptive Trailing Edge Flaps: Sensoring and Control,” Ph.D. thesis, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Zhang, M. , Tan, B. , and Xu, J. , 2016, “ Smart Fatigue Load Control on the Large-Scale Wind Turbine Blades Using Different Sensing Signals,” Renewable Energy, 87(Part 1), pp. 111–119. [CrossRef]
Zhang, M. , Tan, B. , and Xu, J. , “ Parameter Study of Sizing and Placement of Deformable Trailing Edge Flap on Blade Fatigue Load Reduction,” Renewable Energy, 77, pp. 217–226. [CrossRef]
Fischer, J. , Weinzierl, G. , Wagner, J. , and Pechlivanoglou, G. , 2012, “ Development of a Flexible Trailing Edge Flap and System Integration Concept for Wind Turbine Blades,” First German Wind Energy Conference DEWEK, Bremen, Germany, Nov. 7–11
Lackner, M. A. , and van KuikGijs, A. M. , 2010, “ The Performance of Wind Turbine Smart Rotor Control Approaches During Extreme Loads,” ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng., 132(1), p. 011008. [CrossRef]
Wilson, D. G. , Berg, D. E. , Barone, M. F. , Berg, J. C. , Resor, B. R. , and Lobitz, D. W. , 2009, “ Active Aerodynamic Blade Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines,” European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition (EWEC), Marseille, France, Mar. 16–19, pp. 1–7.
Gandhi, F. , and Anusonti-Inthra, P. , 2008, “ Skin Design Studies for Variable Camber Morphing Airfoils,” Smart Mater. Struct., 17(1), p. 015025. [CrossRef]
Woods, B. K. S. , Bilgen, O. , and Friswell, M. I. , 2012, “ Wind Tunnel Testing of the Fish Bone Active Camber Morphing Concept,” 23rd International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies, Nanjing, China, Oct. 11–13, pp. 1–14.
Puterbaugh, M. , and Beyene, A. , 2011, “ Parametric Dependence of a Morphing Wind Turbine Blade on Material Elasticity,” Energy, 36(1), pp. 466–474. [CrossRef]
Cavens, W. D. K. , 2015, “ Design of a Blade Section Featuring Passive Load Alleviation Capabilities Resulting From Variable Stiffness Morphing Structures With a Focus on Large, Modern Wind Turbines,” Masters thesis, DUWIND—Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Franco, J. A. , Jauregui, J. C. , and Toledano-Ayala, M. , 2015, “ Optimizing Wind Turbine Efficiency by Deformable Structures in Smart Blades,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(5), p. 051206. [CrossRef]
Silva, C. T. , and Donadon, M. V. , 2013, “ Unsteady Blade Element-Momentum Method Including Returning Wake Effects,” J. Aerosp. Technol. Manage., 5(1), pp. 27–42.
Hansen, M. O. L. , Sørensen, J. , Voutsinas, S. , Sørensen, N. , and Madsen, H. , 2006, “ State of the Art in Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 42(4), pp. 285–330. [CrossRef]
Sanderce, B. , van der Pijl, S. P. , and Koren, B. , 2011, “ Review of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Wind Turbine Wake Aerodynamics,” Wind Energ., 14(7), pp. 799–819.
Leishman, J. , 2002, “ Challenges in Modeling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” ASME Paper No. WIND2002-37.
Lanzafame, R. , and Messina, M. , 2007, “ Fluid Dynamics Wind Turbine Design: Critical Analysis, Optimization and Application of BEM Theory,” Renewable Energy, 32(14), pp. 2291–2305. [CrossRef]
Hartenberg, R. S. , and Denavit, J. , 1965, Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Pechlivanoglou, G. , 2012, “ Passive and Active Flow Control Solutions for Wind Turbine Blades,” Ph.D. thesis, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The local velocity vector effect in the blade element theory representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Airfoil segments according to the blade element theory: attack angle changes with the blade rotation [23]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Wind turbine coordinates system scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Model simulation strategy

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Camber morphing method, the mean camber line changes for each wind condition to reach an optimal wind turbine performance

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Flux diagram of the computational iterative process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The compliant mechanisms designed and analyzed to achieve the required displacements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Center point comparison between three different NACA profiles (0012, 3312, and 6612)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Functional structure diagram: system divided into three subsystems

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Composite layup diagram: a detailed representation of the materials location and the areas reinforced in the prototype surface

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Deformable sections location: QBlade® software representation of the annular disk where the sections are deformable (left) and the location of the three deformable sections in a singular blade (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Cp comparison between the algorithm developed and QBlade®

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Finite element method results: trailing edge and leading edge required displacements from NACA 0012–6612

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Inner section of the final prototype: 3D model representation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Load-section surfaces NACA 4412 fixed blade versus the morphing blade for different wind velocities (5–15 m/s)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

CFD analysis: (a) pressure distribution and (b) turbulence eddy dissipation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Coordinate measurement system for the geometrical shape morphing validation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Loads and Cp comparison between the NACA 4412 fixed blade versus the morphing blade

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Smart section prototype assembly for aerodynamic wind tunnel tests



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In