0
Technical Brief

Optimal Generation Maintenance Schedule for Bundled Wind–Thermal Generation System

[+] Author and Article Information
Yinghao Ma

State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment
and System Security,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: yinghao_ma@126.com

Kaigui Xie

State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment
and System Security,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: kaiguixie@vip.163.com

Jizhe Dong

Power Economic Research Institute of State Grid Jilin
Electric Power Company Ltd.,
Changchun 130062, China
e-mail: djzccforward@163.com

Heng–Ming Tai

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
University of Tulsa,
Tulsa, OK 74104
e-mail: tai@utulsa.edu

Bo Hu

State Key Laboratory of Power Transmission Equipment
and System Security,
Chongqing University,
Chongqing 400044, China
e-mail: hboy8361@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 25, 2017; final manuscript received July 26, 2017; published online August 22, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Ryo Amano.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 140(1), 014501 (Aug 22, 2017) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-17-1178; doi: 10.1115/1.4037536 History: Received April 25, 2017; Revised July 26, 2017

Bundled wind–thermal generation system (BWTGS) is an effective way to utilize remote large–scale wind power. The optimal generation maintenance schedule (GMS) for BWTGS is not only helpful to improve the system reliability level but also useful to enhance the system economic efficiency and extend the lifetime of components. This paper presents a model to optimize the GMS for BWTGS. The probabilistic production simulation technique is employed to calculate the system costs, and a sequential probabilistic method is utilized to capture the sequential and stochastic nature of wind power. A hybrid optimization algorithm (HOA) based on the simulated annealing (SA) and multipopulation parallel genetic algorithm (GA) is developed to solve the proposed model. Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of this proposed model. Effects of the reliability deterioration of thermal generating units (TGUs) and the pattern of BWTGS transmission power are also investigated.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Sunden, B. , and Wu, Z. , 2017, “ On Heat Transfer Issues for Wind Energy Systems,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 139(5), p. 051201. [CrossRef]
Okumus, I. , and Dinler, A. , 2016, “ Current Status of Wind Energy Forecasting and a Hybrid Method for Hourly Predictions,” Energy Convers. Manage., 123, pp. 362–371. [CrossRef]
NEA of China, 2016, “ The 13th Five-Year Plan for Wind Power Development,” National Energy Administration, Beijing, China, accessed Aug. 14, 2017, http://www.nea.gov.cn/135867633_14804706797341n.pdf (in Chinese).
Zhang, Y. , Tang, N. , Niu, Y. , and Du, X. , 2016, “ Wind Energy Rejection in China: Current Status, Reasons and Perspectives,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 66, pp. 322–344. [CrossRef]
Xie, K. , Dong, J. , Tai, H.-M. , Hu, B. , and He, H. , 2015, “ Optimal Planning of HVDC-Based Bundled Wind–Thermal Generation and Transmission System,” Energy Convers. Manage., 115, pp. 71–79. [CrossRef]
Ni, M. , and Yang, Z. , 2012, “ By Leaps and Bounds: Lessons Learned From Renewable Energy Growth in China,” IEEE Power Energy Mag., 10(2) pp. 37–43. [CrossRef]
Xie, K. , Dong, J. , Singh, C. , and Hu, B. , 2016, “ Optimal Capacity and Type Planning of Generating Units in a Bundled Wind–Thermal Generation System,” Appl. Energy, 164, pp. 200–210. [CrossRef]
Chen, D. , Ma, S. , Song, Y. , Wang, N. , Fang, P. , and Ren, J. , 2014, “ Research on Transient Stability Under HVDC Block Fault in Wind-Thermal-Bundled Power Base Transmitted by AC/DC System,” International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON), Chengdu, China, Oct. 20–22, pp. 2884–2890.
Dopazo, J. F. , and Merrill, H. M. , 1975, “ Optimal Generator Maintenance Scheduling Using Integer Programming,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 94(5), pp. 1537–1545. [CrossRef]
Yellen, J. , Al-Khamia, T. , Vanurl, S. , and Lunonidi, L. , 1992, “ A Decomposition Approach to Unit Maintenance Scheduling,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 7(2), pp. 726–733. [CrossRef]
Kim, J. , and Geem, Z. , 2015, “ Optimal Scheduling for Maintenance Period of Generating Units Using a Hybrid Scatter-Genetic Algorithm,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 9(1) pp. 22–30. [CrossRef]
Schlünz, E. , and Vuuren, J. , 2013, “ An Investigation Into the Effectiveness of Simulated Annealing as a Solution Approach for the Generator Maintenance Scheduling Problem,” Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 53, pp. 166–174. [CrossRef]
Perez-Canto, S. , and Rubio-Romero, J. , 2013, “ A Model for the Preventive Maintenance Scheduling of Power Plants Including Wind Farms,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 119, pp. 67–75. [CrossRef]
Ji, G. , Wu, W. , and Zhang, B. , 2016, “ Robust Generation Maintenance Scheduling Considering Wind Power and Forced Outages,” IET Renewable Power Gener. 10(5) pp. 634–641. [CrossRef]
Dong, J. , Xie, K. , and Hu, B. , 2016, “ Optimal Planning of Bundled Wind-Thermal Generation Systems: A Case Study of China,” J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, 8(1) p. 013308. [CrossRef]
Billinton, R. , and Chowdhury, A. A. , 1992, “ Incorporation of Wind Energy Conversion Systems in Conventional Generating Capacity Adequacy Assessment,” IEE Proc.-C, 139(1) pp. 47–56. [CrossRef]
Atwa, Y. , El-Saadany, E. , Salama, M. , and Seethapathy, R. , 2010, “ Optimal Renewable Resources Mix for Distribution System Energy Loss Minimization,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 25(1), pp. 360–370. [CrossRef]
Billinton, R. , and Oteng-Adjei, J. , 1991, “ Utilization of Interrupted Energy Assessment Rates in Generation and Transmission System Planning,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 6(3) pp. 1245–1253. [CrossRef]
Yamayee, Z. , Sidenblad, K. , and Yoshimura, M. , 1983, “ A Computationally Efficient Optimal Maintenance Scheduling Method,” IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., 102(2), pp. 330–338. [CrossRef]
Feng, C. , Wang, X. , and Li, F. , 2009, “ Optimal Maintenance Scheduling of Power Producers Considering Unexpected Unit Failure,” IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 3(5), pp. 460–471. [CrossRef]
Manickavasagam, M. , Anjos, M. , and Rosehart, W. , 2015, “ Sensitivity-Based Chance-Constrained Generation Expansion Planning,” Electr. Power Syst. Res., 127, pp. 32–40. [CrossRef]
Zeng, R. , Li, H. , Liu, L. , Zhang, X. , and Zhang, G. , 2015, “ A Novel Method Based on Multi-Population Genetic Algorithm for CCHP–GSHP Coupling System Optimization,” Energy Convers. Manage., 105, pp. 1138–1148. [CrossRef]
Metropolis, N. , Rosenbluth, A. W. , Rosenbluth, M. N. , Teller, A. H. , and Teller, E. , 1953, “ Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines,” J. Chem. Phys., 21(6), pp. 1087–1092. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The flowchart of the hybrid algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Wind profile of the typical day in each month used in the case studies

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Results of iteration processes of the HOA and conventional GA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Transmission power in January of four scenarios in case 3 study

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In