Research Papers: Alternative Energy Sources

Effectiveness of Central Swirlers in the Thermal Uniformity of Jet-in-Crossflow Mixing

[+] Author and Article Information
Tarek Elgammal

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
247 W Freshwater Way,
Milwaukee, WI 53204
e-mail: elgammal@uwm.edu

Ryoichi S. Amano

Fellow ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee,
115 E. Reindl Way,
Glendale, WI 53212
e-mail: amano@uwm.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received February 28, 2018; final manuscript received April 21, 2018; published online May 15, 2018. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 140(10), 101202 (May 15, 2018) (11 pages) Paper No: JERT-18-1167; doi: 10.1115/1.4040075 History: Received February 28, 2018; Revised April 21, 2018

The present paper introduces the analysis-led-design concept in attaining the thermal homogeneity at the exit section of a mixing chamber. Staggered holes (SH) chamber type is representing jet-in-crossflow (JICF) where cold air is injected radially into an axially flowing hot air with a different velocity. Streamlined body of prolate-spheroid shape is fitted in the center of the chamber, and equipped with swirl generating fins (Swirlers). Numerical simulations were first run to predict the flow and energy fields and assess the performance of seven cases representing distinct swirlers setting (shape, dimension, and number). An unsteady turbulent condition was adopted considering high Reynolds number (Re) at the boundaries and large eddy simulation (LES) model for solving the eddy motion in the domain. Afterward, experimental measurements worked on validating the numerical results through proving the effectiveness of the recommended swirler design. Graphical and tabulated results showed the difference between the mixing patterns in thermal dimensionless numbers (normalized mixture fraction and uniformity factor), and consideration of total pressure drop was taken. All swirling designs enhanced the mixing process by generating substantial central swirl besides the small eddies formed from the jet interaction. Numerically, average uniformity improvement achieved in all cases studied was 46%, while the recommended geometry (football with four short rectangular swirlers, F4SR) is 16% better than plain football (FB), but loses pressure by 17%. Upon experimentation, F4SR had almost the same positive outcomes against plain football and SH by 24% and 47%, respectively. Finally, F4SR acts well at lower Re.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Schulz, C. , and Sick, V. , 2005, “ Tracer-LIF Diagnostics: Quantitative Measurement of Fuel Concentration, Temperature and Fuel/Air Ratio in Practical Combustion Systems,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 31(1), pp. 75–121. [CrossRef]
Takeishi, K. , Komiyama, M. , Oda, Y. , and Egawa, Y. , 2014, “ Aerothermal Investigations on Mixing Flow Field of Film Cooling With Swirling Coolant Flow,” ASME J. Turbomach., 136(5), p. 051001. [CrossRef]
Rodi, W., ed. , 2014, Turbulent Buoyant Jets and Plumes: HMT: The Science & Applications of Heat and Mass Transfer. Reports, Reviews & Computer Programs, Vol. 6, Elsevier, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Robinson, K. D. , 1999, “ Mixing Effectiveness of AHU Combination Mixing/Filter Box With and Without Filters,” ASHRAE Trans., 105(Pt. 1), p. 88.
Fric, T. F. , 1993, “ Effects of Fuel-Air Unmixedness on NO(x) Emissions,” J. Propul. Power, 9(5), pp. 708–713. [CrossRef]
Sankaran, R. , Im, H. G. , Hawkes, E. R. , and Chen, J. H. , 2005, “ The Effects of Non-Uniform Temperature Distribution on the Ignition of Lean Homogeneous Hydrogen-Air Mixture,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 30(1), pp. 875–882. [CrossRef]
Smith, S. H. , and Mungal, M. G. , 1998, “ Mixing, Structure and Scaling of the Jet in Crossflow,” J. Fluid Mech., 357, pp. 83–122. [CrossRef]
Forghan, F. , Askari, O. , Narusawa, U. , and Metghalchi, H. , 2017, “ Cooling of Turbine Blades With Expanded Exit Holes: Computational Analyses of Leading Edge and Pressure-Side of a Turbine Blade,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 139(4), p. 042004. [CrossRef]
Carlanescu, R. , Prisecaru, T. , Prisecaru, M. , and Soriga, I. , 2018, “ Swirl Injector for Premixed Combustion of Hydrogen–Methane Mixtures,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140(7), p. 072002. [CrossRef]
Gupta, A. , Ibrahim, M. S. , and Amano, R. S. , 2016, “ Effect of Jet-to-Mainstream Momentum Flux Ratio on Mixing Process,” Heat Mass Transfer, 52(3), pp. 621–634. [CrossRef]
Salewski, M. , Stankovic, D. , and Fuchs, L. , 2008, “ Mixing in Circular and Non-Circular Jets in Crossflow,” Flow, Turbul. Combust., 80(2), pp. 255–283. [CrossRef]
Huang, W. , Liu, J. , Jin, L. , and Yan, L. , 2014, “ Molecular Weight and Injector Configuration Effects on the Transverse Injection Flow Field Properties in Supersonic Flows,” Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 32(1), pp. 94–102. [CrossRef]
Mi, J. , Nathan, G. J. , and Luxton, R. E. , 2000, “ Centreline Mixing Characteristics of Jets From Nine Differently Shaped Nozzles,” Exp. Fluids, 28(1), pp. 93–94. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , Liu, W. , Wang, B. , Zhao, Y. , and Zhang, D. , 2015, “ Investigation of Injectant Molecular Weight Effect on the Transverse Jet Characteristics in Supersonic Crossflow,” Acta Astronaut., 114, pp. 101–111. [CrossRef]
Gupta, A. , Ibrahim, M. S. , and Amano, R. S. , 2015, “ Experimental Study of Novel Passive Control Methods to Improve Combustor Exit Temperature Uniformity,” Heat Mass Transfer, 51(1), pp. 23–32. [CrossRef]
Amano, R. S. , and ElGammal, T. , 2016, “ Comparative Study of Using Streamlined Bodies as a Passive Enhancer in Combustor Dilution System,” AIAA Paper No. 2016-0492.
Brooks, F. J. , 2000, GE Gas Turbine Performance Characteristics, GE Power Systems, Schenectady, NY.
Petchers, N. , 2003, Combined Heating, Cooling & Power Handbook: Technologies & Applications: An Integrated Approach to Energy Resource Optimization, The Fairmont Press, Lilburn, GA.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Constructed test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Staggered arranged mixing chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Three-dimensional CAD model of mixer with prescribed boundaries

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Meshed domain: (a) surface polyhedral cells, (b) section volume mesh, and (c) boundary prism layers and finer mesh at jet inlet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Streamlined prolate spheroid equipped with (a) four tall rectangular swirlers, (b) eight short rectangular swirlers, (c) four tall airfoil swirlers, (d) no swirlers, (e) four short rectangular swirlers, (f) eight tall rectangular swirlers, and (g) four short airfoil swirlers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Mesh independence test on exit mix temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Experimental and numerical radial variation of the exit temperature in a F4SR mixing chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Experimental radial variation of the normalized thermal mixture fraction in mixer with SH, FB, F4SR at Re = 850,000, and F4SR at Re = 200,000

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Vorticity contouring over streamlined bodies: (a) F4SR-F8SR and (b) F4TR-F8TR

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Temperature contours of the mixed flow at the exit pipe in (a) F4SR (left)/F4TR (right), (b) F4SA (left)/ F4TA (right), and (c) F8SR (left)/F8TR (right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Radial variation of the normalized thermal mixture fraction in cases: (a) FB-F4SR-F4TR, (b) FB-F8SR-F8TR, and (c) FB-F4SA-F4TA

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

(a) Radial and (b) tangential velocities variation along the exit pipe for F4SR, F4SA, F4TA, and F4TR cases

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Radial variation of the normalized thermal mixture fraction in mixer with (a) F4SR versus F4SA and (b) F4TR versus F4TA



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In