Research Papers: Alternative Energy Sources

Significance of Transient Exergy Terms in a New Tray Design Solar Desalination Device

[+] Author and Article Information
Gregory J. Kowalski

Associate Professor
ASME Fellow
Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: gkowal@coe.neu.edu

Masoud Modaresifar

Department of Mechanical
and Industrial Engineering,
Northeastern University,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: Modaresifar.m@husky.neu.edu

Mansour Zenouzi

ASME Fellow
Department of Mechanical Engineering
and Technology,
Wentworth Institute of Technology,
Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: zenouzim@wit.edu

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received March 7, 2014; final manuscript received May 6, 2014; published online August 1, 2014. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 137(1), 011201 (Aug 01, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: JERT-14-1068; doi: 10.1115/1.4027764 History: Received March 07, 2014; Revised May 06, 2014

An investigation of the transient exergy property term, exergy storage, for a new desalination tray design was performed. It was illustrated that exergy destruction rates provide a means of comparing alternative energy solutions and a measure of their sustainability. To satisfy these objectives one needs accurate calculation of exergy destruction rates. It was confirmed that neglecting the exergy storage term is not a valid approximation for the hourly and daily averaged values of the second law analysis. For a solar desalination system neglecting the exergy storage terms introduced a maximum difference in the exergy destruction rate of 7.4% and a difference of 7.3% in the daily average. In the solar desalination process with energy recovery the second law performance is greater than that for the reverse osmosis (RO) process, the chief competitor, when the exergy storage terms are correctly included in the analysis. The results demonstrate that for variable energy sources such as renewable energy systems, the second law analysis provides a measure of the sustainability of competing system and that the exergy storage terms should be included in the analysis.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Fronk, B. M., Richard, N., and Srinivas, G., 2010, “Evolution of the Transition to a World Driven by Renewable Energy,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 132(2), p. 021009. [CrossRef]
Kajitvichyanukul, P., Hung, Y.-T., and Wang, L. K., 2011, “Handbook of Environmental Engineering,” Membrane and Desalination Technologies, Vol. 13, L. K.Wang, J. P.Chen, Y. T.Hung, and N. K.Shammas, eds., Humana Press, New York.
Cipollina, A., Micale, G., and Rizzuti, L., eds., 2009, Seawater Desalination—Conventional and Renewable Energy Processes, Springer, Berlin.
Klausner, J. F., Yi, L., Mohamed, D., and Renwei, M., 2004, “Innovative Diffusion Driven Desalination Process,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 126(3), pp. 219–225. [CrossRef]
Ettouney, H. M., El-Dessouky, H. T., and Alatiqi, I., 1999, “Understand Thermal Desalination,” Chem. Eng. Prog., 95(9), pp. 43–54.
Kowalski, G. J., and Zenouzi, M., 2010, “Enhanced Performance Design of Solar Desalination Device,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2010-40360. [CrossRef]
Malik, M. A. S., Tiwari, G. N., Kumar, A., and Sodha, M. S., 1982, Solar Distillation, Pergamon, Oxford, UK.
Romero-Ternero, V., Garcia-Rodriguez, L., and Gomez-Camacho, C., 2005, “Thermoeconomic Analysis of Wind Powered Seawater Reverse Osmosis Desalination in the Canary Islands,” Desalination, 186(1–3), pp. 291–298. [CrossRef]
Farahbod, F., Mowla, D., Jafari Nasr, M. R., and Soltanieh, M., 2012, “Investigation of Solar Desalination Pond Performance Experimentally and Mathematically,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 134(4), p. 041201. [CrossRef]
Hepbasli, A., 2008, “A Key Review on Exergetic Analysis and Assessment of Renewable Energy Resources for a Sustainable Future,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 12(3), pp. 593–661. [CrossRef]
Garcia-Rodriguez, L., and Gomez-Camacho, C., 2001, “Exergy Analysis of the SOL-14 Plant,” Desalination, 137(1–3), pp. 251–258. [CrossRef]
Tiwari, G. N., Dimri, V., and Chel, A., 2009, “Parametric Study of an Active and Passive Solar Distillation System: Energy and Exergy Analysis,” Desalination, 242(1–3), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Petela, R., 2003, “Exergy of Undiluted Thermal Radiation,” Sol. Energy, 74(6), pp. 469–488. [CrossRef]
Valero, A., Serra, L., and Uche, J., 2006, “Fundamentals of Exergy Cost Accounting and Thermoeconomics. Part I: Theory,” ASME J. Energy Res. Technol., 128(1), pp. 1–8. [CrossRef]
Aljundi, I. H., 2009, “Second-Law Analysis of a Reverse Osmosis Plant in Jordan,” Desalination, 239(1–3), pp. 207–215. [CrossRef]
Cerci, Y., 2002, “Exergy Analysis of a Reverse Osmosis Desalination Plant in California,” Desalination, 142(3), pp. 257–266. [CrossRef]
Kahraman, N., and Cengel, Y., 2005, “Exergy Analysis of a MSF Distillation Plant,” Energy Convers. Manage., 46(15–16), pp. 2625–2636. [CrossRef]
Modaresifar, M., Zenouzi, M., and Kowalski, G. J., 2013, “Transient Exergy Analysis for Solar Desalination Processes,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2013-65466. [CrossRef]
Kowalski, G. J., Zenouzi, M., and Modaresifar, M., 2013, “Entropy Production: Integrating Renewable Energy Sources Into Sustainable Energy Solution,” 12th Joint European Thermodynamics Conference, Brescia, Italy, July 1–5.
Modaresifar, M., Zenouzi, M., and Kowalski, G. J., 2012, “Exergetic Performance Comparisons of Solar Desalination Devices and Reverse Osmosis Processes,” ASME Paper No. ES2012-91517. [CrossRef]
Masters, G. M., 2004, Renewable and Efficient Electric Power Systems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
Moran, M. J., and Shapiro, H. N., Fundamentals of Engineering Thermodynamics, 5th ed., Wiley.
Zyryanov, V. N., 2010, “Physical Properties of Sea Water, Including Its Three Phases,” Institute of Water Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Sharqawy, M. H., Lienhard, J. H., and Zubair, S. M., 2010, “Formulation of Seawater Flow Exergy Using Accurate Thermodynamic Data,” ASME Paper No. IMECE2010-40915. [CrossRef]
Rashad, A., and EI Maihy, A., 2009, “Energy and Exergy Analysis of a Steam Power Plant in Egypt,” 13th International Conference on Aerospace Sciences & Aviation Technology (ASAT-13), Cairo, Egypt, May 26–28.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic diagram of the tray design solar still. The incident solar radiation is absorbed on the absorber plate and the energy is conducted into the water tray. The evaporated water vapor is condensed on the shaded rear surface where the freshwater is collected.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of exergy balance for a solar still distillation system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The summary of the predicted incident radiation and ambient temperature for the two days investigated July 15 and Dec. 15 for the Boston Massachusetts, USA region

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Comparison of the water temperatures in the tray design solar desalination units with the solar temperature. The performance for the July design day is shown.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic diagram of exergy balance for solar still distillation system with recovery

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of the freshwater production for the tray design for recovery and nonrecovery. The performance for the July is shown.



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In