Research Papers: Energy Systems Analysis

A Comparative Analysis of Single Nozzle and Multiple Nozzles Arrangements for Syngas Combustion in Heavy Duty Gas Turbine

[+] Author and Article Information
Shi Liu, Xiaoqing Xiao

Electric Power Research Institute of Guangdong
Power Grid Corporation,
Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China

Hong Yin

Electric Power Research Institute
of Guangdong Power Grid Corporation,
Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China

Yan Xiong

Energy and Power Research Center of Chinese
Academy of Sciences,
Lianyungang 222069, Jiangsu Province, China
e-mail: dennis198738@163.com

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 11, 2016; final manuscript received June 30, 2016; published online August 17, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Mohamed A. Habib.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 139(2), 022004 (Aug 17, 2016) (9 pages) Paper No: JERT-16-1208; doi: 10.1115/1.4034232 History: Received May 11, 2016; Revised June 30, 2016

Heavy duty gas turbines are the core components in the integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) system. Different from the conventional fuel for gas turbine such as natural gas and light diesel, the combustible component acquired from the IGCC system is hydrogen-rich syngas fuel. It is important to modify the original gas turbine combustor or redesign a new combustor for syngas application since the fuel properties are featured with the wide range hydrogen and carbon monoxide mixture. First, one heavy duty gas turbine combustor which adopts natural gas and light diesel was selected as the original type. The redesign work mainly focused on the combustor head and nozzle arrangements. This paper investigated two feasible combustor arrangements for the syngas utilization including single nozzle and multiple nozzles. Numerical simulations are conducted to compare the flow field, temperature field, composition distributions, and overall performance of the two schemes. The obtained results show that the flow structure of the multiple nozzles scheme is better and the temperature distribution inside the combustor is more uniform, and the total pressure recovery is higher than the single nozzle scheme. Through the full scale test rig verification, the combustor redesign with multiple nozzles scheme is acceptable under middle and high pressure combustion test conditions. Besides, the numerical computations generally match with the experimental results.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Bannister, R. L. , Newby, R. A. , and Yang, W. C. , 1998, “ Development of a Hydrogen-Fueled Combustion Turbine Cycle for Power Generation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 120(2), pp. 267–283. [CrossRef]
Ibrahim, A. S. , and Ahmed, S. F. , 2015, “ Measurements of Laminar Flame Speeds of Alternative Gaseous Fuel Mixtures,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(3), p. 032209. [CrossRef]
Lieuwen, T. , McDonell, V. , Petersen, E. , and Santavicca, D. , 2008, “ Fuel Flexibility Influences on Premixed Combustor Blowout, Flash Back, Autoignition and Stability,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 130(1), p. 011506. [CrossRef]
Sanusi, Y. S. , Habib, M. A. , and Mokheimer, E. M. A. , 2014, “ Experimental Study on the Effect of Hydrogen Enrichment of Methane on the Stability and Emission of Non-Premixed Swirl Stabilized Combustor,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(3), p. 032203. [CrossRef]
Davis, L. B. , and Black, S. H. , 1999, “ Dry Low NOx Combustion Systems for GE Heavy-Duty Gas Turbines,” Report No. GE Power Systems_GER-3568G.
Feigl, M. , Setzer, F. , Varela, R. F. , Myers, G. , and Sweet, B. , 2005, “ Field Test Validation of the DLN 2.5H Combustion System on the 9H Gas Turbine at Balgan Bay Power Station,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68843.
York, W. D. , Ziminsky, W. S. , and Yilmaz, E. , 2013, “ Development and Testing of a Low NOx Hydrogen Combustion System for Heavy Duty Gas Turbines,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(2), p. 022001. [CrossRef]
Chacartegui, R. , Torres, M. , Sanchez, D. , Jimenez, F. , Munoz, A. , and Sanchez, T. , 2011, “ Analysis of Main Gaseous Emissions of Heavy Duty Gas Turbines Burning Several Syngas Fuels,” Fuel Process. Technol., 92(2), pp. 213–220. [CrossRef]
Dodo, S. , Asai, T. , Koizumi, H. , Takahashi, H. , Yoshida, S. , and Inoue, H. , 2014, “ Performance of a Multiple-Injection Dry Low NOx Combustor With Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Fuels,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 135(1), p. 011501. [CrossRef]
Asai, T. , Dodo, S. , Karishuku, M. , Yagi, N. , Akiyama, Y. , and Hayashi, A. , 2015, “ Part Load Operation of a Multiple-Injection Dry Low NOx Combustor on Hydrogen-Rich Syngas Fuel in an IGCC Pilot Plant,” ASME Paper No. GT2015-42312.
Deng, X. , Xiong, Y. , Yin, H. , and Gao, Q. , 2016, “ Numerical Study of the Effect of Nozzle Configurations on Characteristics of MILD Combustion for Gas Turbine Application,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 138(4), p. 042212. [CrossRef]
Lai, M. , Reynolds, R. R. , and Armstrong, J. , 2002, “ CFD-Based, Parametric, Design Tool for Gas Turbine Combustors From Compressor Deswirl Exit to Turbine Inlet,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30090.
Dudebout, R. , Reynolds, B. , and Molla-Hosseini, K. , 2004, “ Integrated Process for CFD Modeling and Optimization of Gas Turbine Combustors,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-54011.
Safari, M. , and Sheikhi, M. R. H. , 2014, “ Large Eddy Simulation for Prediction of Entropy Generation in a Non-Premixed Turbulent Jet Flame,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 136(2), p. 022002. [CrossRef]
Gobbato, P. , Masi, M. , Toffolo, A. , and Lazzaretto, A. , 2011, “ Numerical Simulation of a Hydrogen Fuelled Gas Turbine Combustor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36(13), pp. 7993–8002. [CrossRef]
Shih, H. Y. , and Liu, C. R. , 2014, “ A Computational Study on the Combustion of Hydrogen/Methane Blended Fuels for a Micro Gas Turbine,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 39(27), pp. 15103–15115. [CrossRef]
Bulat, G ., 2015, “ Reacting Flow in an Industrial Gas Turbine Combustor: LES and Experimental Analysis,” Proc. Combust. Inst., 35(3), pp. 3175–3183. [CrossRef]
Alzahrani, F. M. , Sanusi, Y. S. , Vogiatzaki, K. , Ghoniem, A. F. , Habib, M. A. , and Mokheimer, E. M. A. , 2015, “ Evaluation of the Accuracy of Selected Syngas Chemical Mechanisms,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(4), p. 042201. [CrossRef]
Bulat, G. , Jones, W. P. , and Marquis, A. J. , 2014, “ NO and CO Formation in an Industrial Gas Turbine Combustion Chamber Using LES With the Eulerian Sub-Grid PDF Method,” Combust. Flame, 161(7), pp. 1804–1825. [CrossRef]
Cui, Y. , 2005, “ Numerical and Experimental Investigation on Gas Turbine Combustor for Syngas,” Ph.D. thesis, Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiong, Y. , Ji, L. , Zhang, Z. , Wang, Y. , and Xiao, Y. , 2008, “ Three Dimensional CFD Analysis of a Gas Turbine Combustor for Medium/Low Heating Value Syngas Fuel,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50662.
Shih, T.-H. , Liou, W. W. , Shabbir, A. , Yang, Z. , and Zhu, J. , 1995, “ A New k-ε Eddy-Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows—Model Development and Validation,” Comput. Fluids, 24(3), pp. 227–238. [CrossRef]
Chen, L. , and Battaglia, F. , 2015, “ The Effects of Fuel Mixtures in Non-Premixed Combustion for a Bluff-Body Flame,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 138(2), p. 022204. [CrossRef]
Peters, N ., 1984, “ Laminar Diffusion Flamelet Models in Non-Premixed Turbulent Combustion,” Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 10(3), pp. 319–339. [CrossRef]
Drake, M. C. , and Blint, R. J. , 1989, “ Thermal NOx in Stretch Laminar Opposed-Flow Diffusion Flames With CO/H2/N2 Fuel,” Combust. Flame, 76(2), pp. 151–167. [CrossRef]
Bruce, T. W. , Mongia, H. C. , and Reynolds, R. S. , 1978, “ Combustor Design Criteria Validation,” Report No. USARTL-TR-78-55A, 55B, 55C.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Mesh generation for the combustor simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Multiple nozzles combustor head structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Single nozzle combustor head structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Three-dimensional illustration of the combustor liner and the combustor head scheme

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Original combustor model structure

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Mesh independence check and comparison of axial velocity (left: 6 × 106, right: 10 × 106)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Boundary conditions type specification

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Can combustor structure for combustion model validation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Axial velocity comparison of numerical simulation and experimental results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Axial velocity distribution and streamline in 0 deg cut-plane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Axial cut-plane of mixture fraction and OH mole fraction for two schemes (up: single nozzle case, down: multiple nozzles case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Display of full-scale combustion test facility

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Axial cut-plane of temperature and axial velocity distribution for two schemes (up: single nozzle case, down: multiple nozzles case)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Temperature distribution at the transition piece outlet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Temperature distribution at the transition piece outlet

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Radial distribution of averaged temperature data



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In