Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Investigations on Oilwell Cement Strength Response to Ultrasonic Measurements in the Presence of Additives1

[+] Author and Article Information
Niklas Romanowski

TU Clausthal Clausthal-Zellerfeld,
Niedersachsen 39678, Germany

Adonis Ichim, Catalin Teodoriu

The University of Oklahoma,
Norman, OK 73019

Contributed by the Petroleum Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received July 22, 2017; final manuscript received January 3, 2018; published online March 20, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Ray (Zhenhua) Rui.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 140(7), 072904 (Mar 20, 2018) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-17-1376; doi: 10.1115/1.4039316 History: Received July 22, 2017; Revised January 03, 2018

Well cements are an important aspect of wellbore integrity and recent investigations focus on describing the cement lifetime using, when possible, nondestructive tests like ultrasonic measurements. However, the original API and ASTM testing standards were based on destructive mechanical testing of cements, leading to the decision to investigate the backward and forward compatibility between ultrasonic measurements and mechanical testing, which makes the subject of this work. Ultrasonic cement measurement became a very popular method to assess the mechanical properties of the cement in a nondestructive manner. Since various measurement systems exist on the market, the development of an accurate reference data base that can be used to calibrate such measurements becomes very important. Two major systems have therefore been compared: the ultrasonic compressive strength, using the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) principle, and the unconfined compressive strength (UCS), using the standard testing frame according to API and ASTM standards. The tests have been performed at different curing times, using both devices, on API Class G cements with bentonite and other additives. This paper presents the results of over 200 experiments that have displayed a different UPV response as a function of the additive content. Cement specific UPV versus UCS correlations were established. Thereby, a new level of accuracy was reached. Moreover, it was observed that after a given curing time, depending on the additive and its concentration, the UPV response is not as sensitive as the results yielded by the UCS method. The outcomes are an important step forward to improve and understand the wellbore integrity.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Nelson, E. B. , 1990, Well Cementing, Developments in Petroleum Science, Vol. 28, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Keating, J. , Hannant, D. J. , and Hibbert, A. P. , 1989, “ Correlation Between Cube Strength, Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, and Volume Change for Oil Well Cement Slurries,” Cem. Concr. Res., 19(5), pp. 715–726.
Salehi, S. , Khattak, M. , Ali, N. , Ezeakacha, C. C. , and Saleh, F. K. , 2017, “ Study and Use of Geopolymer Mixtures for Oil and Gas Well Cementing Applications,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140(1), p. 012908. [CrossRef]
Taleghani, A. , and Klimenko, D. , 2015, “ An Analytical Solution for Microannulus Cracks Developed Around a Wellbore,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 137(6), p. 062901. [CrossRef]
Zhou, D. , and Wojtanowicz, A. K. , 2011, “ Annular Pressure Reduction During Primary Cementing,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 133(3), p. 031003. [CrossRef]
Zhou, D. , and Wojtanowicz, A. K. , 2009, “ Cement Seal Failure at Casing Shoein Shallow Marine Sediments,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol, 131(2), p. 023101. [CrossRef]
Shuker, M. T. , Memon, K. R. , and Tunio, S. Q. , 2014, “ Laboratory Investigation on Performance of Cement Using Different Additives Schemes to Improve Early Age Compressive Strength,” Res. J. Appl. Sci., Eng. Technol., 7(11), pp. 2298–2305.
Tesinova, P. , 2011, Advances in Composite Materials—Analysis of Natural and Man-Made Materials, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia. [CrossRef]
Labibzadeh, M. , Zahabizadeh, B. , and Khajehdezfuly, A. , 2010, “ Early-Age Compressive Strength Assessment of Oil Well Class G Cement Due to Borehole Pressure and Temperature Changes,” J. Am. Sci., 6(7), pp. 38–47. http://www.hydrorelief.org/frackdata/references/lecolier_2007_durability_portland_cement05_2740_am0607_38_47.pdf
Rao, P. P. , Sutton, D. L. , Childs, J. D. , and Cunningham, W. C. , 1982, “ An Ultrasonic Device for Nondestructive Testing of Oilwell Cements at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures,” J. Pet. Technol., 34(11), pp. 2611–2616. [CrossRef]
Trtnik, G. , Kavcic, F. , and Turk, G. , 2009, “ Prediction of Concrete Strength Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Artificial Neural Networks,” Ultrasonics, 49(1), pp. 53–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Piot, B. , 2009, “Cement and Cementing: An Old Technique With a Future?,” SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, TX.
Mountain Cement Company, 2016, “Certificate of Test: Class G Well Cement—Grade MSR,” Mountain Cement Company, Laramie, WY.
Switzer, W. L. , 2016, “Density of Water,” North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, accessed Mar. 7, 2018, https://www.ncsu.edu/chemistry/resource/H2Odensity_vp.html
Halliburton, 2006, “Halliburton Cementing Bentonite (Halliburton Gel),” Halliburton, Houston, TX, accessed Mar. 7, 2018, http://www.halliburton.com/public/cem/contents/chem_compliance/web/h02088-a4.pdf
API, 2000, “Specification for Cements and Materials for Well Cementing,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Standard No. API 10A. https://www.browntechnical.org/products/api-10a-specification-for-cements-and-materials-for-well-cementing.html
Bett, E. K. , 2010, “Geothermal Well Cementing Materials and Placement Techniques,” United Nations University Geothermal Training Programme, United Nations University, Reykjavik, Iceland, Report No. 10. https://orkustofnun.is/gogn/unu-gtp-report/UNU-GTP-2010-10.pdf
Friedrich Leuert GmbH, 2014, “Mud Balance Product Information,” Friedrich Leuert GmbH, Adendorf, Germany, accessed Mar. 7, 2018, http://www.leutert.com/media/cement/downloads/en/pi_mud-balance_en.pdf
Test Mark Industries, 2015, “iD Operators Manual: CM-2500 iD,” Test Mark Industries, Inc., East Palestine, OH.
Proceq Europe, 2015, “Operating Instructions: Pundit Lab/Pundit Lab + Ultrasonic Instrument,” Proceq Europe, Schwerzenbach, Switzerland.
Germann Instruments, 2016, “PUNDIT Lab (online),” Germann Instruments, Copenhagen, Denmark, accessed Mar. 7, 2018, http://germann.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Pundit.pdf
Test Mark Industries, 2016, “CM-2500,” Test Mark Industries, Inc., East Palestine, OH, accessed Mar. 7, 2018, https://www.testmark.net/2500.html
Okrusch, M. , 2009, Mineralogie: Eine Einführung in Die Spezielle Mineralogie, Petrologie Und Lagerstättenkunde, Springer Verlag, Berlin.
Ted Pella, 2017, “Material Hardness Table,” Ted Pella, Inc., Redding, CA, accessed Mar. 7, 2018, https://www.tedpella.com/company_html/hardness.htm
Goodwin, A. R. H. , and Trusler, J. P. M. , 2003, “ 6 - Speed of Sound,” Exp. Thermodyn., 6, pp. 237–323.
Romanowski , 2017, “Interview With Various Testing Equipment Companies,” Private Communication.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Two-inch cube molds

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Relationship between compressive strength S and pulse velocity Vp, Trtnik et al. [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationship between UCS and UPV measured for three cement recipes; error bar analysis still shows a clear differentiation between the three types of cement

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Cement cube and measurement sites (L—length, W—width)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Crush test device (after Ref. [23])

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

UPV measurement device

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Ultrasonic pulse velocity versus UCS response for low UCS values (first 3 days of curing)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Graphic comparison between this study and Trtnik et al. [12]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Error sensitivity graph for well cement samples of Rao et al. (top) [11] and this research study (bottom)



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In