Research Papers: Petroleum Engineering

Determination and Implication of Ultimate Water Cut in Well-Spacing Design for Developed Reservoirs With Water Coning

[+] Author and Article Information
Samir Prasun

Department of Petroleum Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
Apartment 1252, 275 West Roosevelt Street,
Baton Rouge, LA 70802
e-mail: Prasoonsamir@gmail.com

A. K. Wojtanowicz

Department of Petroleum Engineering,
Louisiana State University,
3212A, PFT Hall,
Baton Rouge, LA 70803
e-mail: awojtan@lsu.edu

Manuscript received November 8, 2017; final manuscript received March 13, 2018; published online April 9, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Arash Dahi Taleghani.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 140(8), 082902 (Apr 09, 2018) (12 pages) Paper No: JERT-17-1629; doi: 10.1115/1.4039743 History: Received November 08, 2017; Revised March 13, 2018

Theoretically, ultimate water-cut (WCult) defines stabilized well's oil and water production rates for uncontained oil pay underlain with water. However, in a real multiwell reservoir, the well's drainage area is contained by a no-flow boundary (NFB) that would control water coning, so the WCult concept should be qualified and related to the well-spacing size. Also, the presently used WCult formula derives from several simplifying assumptions, so its validity needs to be verified. The study shows that in multiwell bottom-water reservoirs, the production water-cut would never stabilize (after initial rapid increase) but would continue increasing at slow rate dependent on the production rate and well-spacing size. At each production rate, there is a minimum well-spacing size above which water-cut becomes practically constant at the value defined here as pseudoWCult. A new formula—developed in this study—correlates the minimum well-spacing with reservoir properties. Further, formula for pseudoWCult is derived by considering radial flow distortion effects in the oil and water zones. It is found that for well-spacing larger than the minimum well-spacing, the two effects-when combined-do not change the water-cut value. Thus, in practical applications, for sufficiently large well-spacing, the pseudoWCult values can be computed from the presently used WCult formula. The pseudoWCult concept has potential practical use in well-spacing design for ultimate recovery determined by the water cut economic limit, WCec. When the water-cut economic margin (WCec–WCult) is large, well-spacing has little effect on the ultimate recovery, so large well-spacing could be designed. However, when the water-cut economic margin is small, reservoir development decision should consider increase of final recovery by reducing well-spacing below the minimum well-spacing.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Topics: Reservoirs , Water
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Kuo, M. C. T. , and Desbrisay, C. L. , 1983, “A Simplified Method for Water Coning Predictions,” 58th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Francisco, CA, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No. SPE-12067-MS.
Joshi, S. D. , 1991, Horizontal Well Technology, 1st ed., Penn Well Books, Tulsa, OK.
Prasun, S. , and Wojtanowicz, A. K. , 2016, “Determination and Implication of Ultimate Water Cut in Well-Spacing Design for Reservoirs With Water Coning,” SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Canton, OH, Sept. 13–15, SPE Paper No. 184075-MS.
Sobocinski, D. P. , and Cornelius, A. J. , 1965, “A Correlation for Predicting Water Coning Time,” J. Pet. Technol., 17(5), pp. 594–600. [CrossRef]
Siemek, J. , and Stopa, J. , 2002, “A Simplified Semi-Analytical Model for Water-Coning Control in Oil Wells With Dual Completions System,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 124(4), pp. 246–252. [CrossRef]
Wojtanowicz, A. K. , and Armenta, M. , 2004, “Assessment of Down-Hole Water Sink Technology for Controlling Water Inflow at Petroleum Wells,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 126(4), pp. 334–341. [CrossRef]
Shirman, E. , and Wojtanowicz, A. K. , 2009, “Vertical Interference Tests in Wells With Downhole Water Sink Completions,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 131(3), p. 033103. [CrossRef]
Shirman, E. , Wojtanowicz, A. K. , and Kurban, H. , 2014, “Enhancing Oil Recovery With Bottom Water Drainage Completion,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 136(4), p. 042908.
Shirman, E. I. , and Wojtanowicz, A. K. , 2000, “More Oil Using Downhole Water-Sink Technology: A Feasibility Study,” SPE Prod. Facil., 15(4), pp. 234–240. [CrossRef]
Meyer, H. I. , and Searcy, D. F. , 1956, “Analog Study of Water Coning,” J. Pet. Technol., 8(4), pp. 207–302. [CrossRef]
Shirman, E. I. , and Wojtanowicz, A. K. , 1997, “Water Coning Reversal Using Downhole Water Sink-Theory and Experimental Study,” SPE Annual Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, TX, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No. SPE-38792-MS.
Longxin, M. , Ruifeng, W. , and Xianghong, W. , 2015, “Development Features and Affecting Factors of Natural Depletion of Sandstone Reservoirs in Sudan,” Pet. Explor. Dev., 42(3), pp. 347–351.
Matthews, J. D. , Carter, J. N. , and Dake, L. P. , 1992, “Investigation of Optimum Well Spacing for North Sea Eocene Reservoirs,” European Petroleum Conference, Cannes, France, Nov. 16–18, SPE Paper No. SPE-25030-MS.
Qin, W. , Wojtanowicz, A. K. , and Luo, P. , 2016, “Investigation of Well Production Mechanism in Heavy Oil Reservoirs Underlain by Strong Bottom Water,” ASME Paper No. OMAE2016-54040.
Cavazzuti, M. , 2013, Optimization Methods; From Theory to Design Scientific and Technological Aspects in Mechanics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Ferreira, S. L. C. , Bruns, R. E. , Ferreira, H. S. , Matos, G. D. , David, J. M. , Brandao, G. C. , da Sliva, E. G. P. , Portugal, L. A. , dos Reis, P. S. , Souza, A. S. , and dos Santos, W. N. L. , 2007, “Box-Behnken Design: An Alternative for the Optimization of Analytical Methods,” Anal. Chim. Acta, 597(2), pp. 179–186.
Moran, J. N. , and Finklea, E. E. , 1962, “Theoretical Analysis of Pressure Phenomena Associated With the Wireline Formation Tester,” J. Pet. Technol., 14(8), pp. 899–908. [CrossRef]
Joseph, J. A. , and Koederitz, L. F. , 1985, “Unsteady-State Spherical Flow With Storage and Skin,” Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 25(6), pp. 804–822. [CrossRef]
Papatzacos, P. , 1986, “Approximate Partial-Penetration Pseudoskin for Infinite-Conductivity Wells,” SPE Reservoir Eng., 2(2), pp. 227–234. [CrossRef]
Chaperon, I. , 1986, “Theoretical Study of Coning Toward Horizontal and Vertical Wells in Anisotropic Formations: Subcritical and Critical Rates,” SPE 61st Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, LA, Oct. 5–8, SPE Paper No. SPE-15377-MS.
White, C. D. , Willis, B. J. , Narayanan, K. , and Dutton, S. P. , 2000, “Identifying Controls on Reservoir Behaviour Using Designed Simulations,” SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, Oct. 1–4, SPE Paper No. SPE-62971-MS.
Myers, R. H. , and Montgomery, C. D. , 1995, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, Wiley, New York.
Jin, L. , 2013, “A Feasibility Study of Multi-Functional Wells for Water Coning Control and Disposal,” Ph.D. thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Oil and water horizontal flow in their respective zones

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Typical patterns of water cut showing partial or no stabilization—after (Kuo and Desbrisay 1983)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Radial model of oil with constant pressure bottom water

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Water cut pattern (reservoir # 7) for different size of well-spacing (Q = 2000 bbl/day) depicting pseudo-stabilization at well-spacing greater than threshold spacing

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Oil and water inflow schematics representing the flow distortion due to partially penetrating oil-zone and the semispherical flow due to water-sink

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison of ultimate water-cut using presently used formula, Eq. (2) and new formula, Eq. (9)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Ultimate recovery versus well-spacing (reservoir # 7; minimum (threshold) well-spacing = 4400 ft, pseudoWCult = 0.9): recovery becomes independent of well-spacing at (WCec-pseudoWCult) ≫ 0

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Higher recovery for smaller well-spacing at (WCec-pseudoWCult)≅0—reservoir#12 (pseudoWCult = 91%)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Recovery factor versus water-cut (reservoir # 12, pseudoWCult = 0.91): ultimate recovery increases with reduced well-spacing when WCec <= pseudoWCult, whereas it converges when (WCec-pseudoWCult) ≫ 0



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In