Research Papers: Energy Systems Analysis

A Novel Reactor Configuration for Industrial Methanol Production From the Synthesis Gas

[+] Author and Article Information
Payam Parvasi

Department of Chemical,
Petroleum and Gas Engineering,
Shiraz University of Technology,
Shiraz 13876-71557, Iran

Seyyed Mohammad Jokar

Department of Chemical,
Petroleum and Gas Engineering,
Shiraz University of Technology,
Shiraz 13876-71557, Iran
e-mail: jokar@sutech.ac.ir

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 26, 2018; final manuscript received November 11, 2018; published online December 24, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Esmail M. A. Mokheimer.

J. Energy Resour. Technol 141(4), 042007 (Dec 24, 2018) (7 pages) Paper No: JERT-18-1363; doi: 10.1115/1.4042025 History: Received May 26, 2018; Revised November 11, 2018

In this work, the methanol synthesis on a commercial industrial catalyst in a novel cylindrical radial flow packed-bed reactor is investigated. The adiabatic and nonadiabatic cylindrical radial flow reactors were proposed and modeled in this research. The proposed configuration has been compared with conventional reactor for methanol production. It leads to higher methanol production and lower pressure drop, with the same catalyst consumption. Furthermore, the results show that the nonadiabatic radial flow packed-bed reactor has a higher methanol content compared with the adiabatic one. The improvement in methanol production was studied by optimizing the essential parameters such as inlet temperatures of the feed and cooling water as well as the number of cooling tubes. The nonlinearity and complexity of the reactor models make the traditional optimization methods ineffective and improbable. Therefore, the process was optimized by genetic algorithm (GA) method, which is one of the most powerful methods. The optimum values for the number of cooling tubes, feed and cooling water temperatures were 308, 507.6 K, and 522.43 K, respectively. The optimization results showed that a new reactor design could be proposed to reduce the cost of methanol synthesis.

Copyright © 2019 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Olah, G. A. , 2005, “ Beyond Oil and Gas: The Methanol Economy,” Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44(18), pp. 2636–2636. [CrossRef]
Panda, J. K. , Sastry, R. K. , and Rai, R. N. , 2017, “ A Taguchi-Fuzzy Based Multi-Objective Optimization of a DI Diesel Engine Fueled With Different Blends of Leucas Zeylanica Methyl Ester (lzme) and 2-EHN Diesel Additive With Diesel,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 139(4), p. 042209. [CrossRef]
Hu, G. , Liao, S. , Zuo, Z. , Wang, K. , and Zhu, Z. , 2018, “ Kinetic Effects of Methanol Addition on the Formation and Consumption of Formaldehyde and Benzene in Premixed n-Heptane/Air Flames,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140(7), p. 072205. [CrossRef]
Zhang, C. , Ge, Y. , Tan, J. , Li, L. , Peng, Z. , and Wang, X. , 2017, “ Emissions From Light-Duty Passenger Cars Fueled With Ternary Blend of Gasoline, Methanol, and Ethanol,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 139(6), p. 062202. [CrossRef]
Alvin, B. S. , 1997, “ Methanol, Past, Present, and Speculation on the Future,” AICHE J., 23, pp. 362–375.
Roos, H. , Steigelmann, G. , and Klause, R. , 1993, “ Seventy Years of Catalysts for Methanol Synthesis-Historical and Recent Developments,” World Methanol Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, Nov. 29–Dec. 1, pp. XIII–1.
Lovik, I. , Hillestad, M. , and Hertzberg, T. , 1998, “ Long Term Dynamic Optimization of a Catalytic Reactor System,” Comput. Chem. Eng., 22(Suppl. 1), pp. 707–710. [CrossRef]
Rezaie, N. , Jahanmiri, A. , Moghtaderi, B. , and Rahimpour, M. R. , 2005, “ A Comparison of Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Dynamic Models for Industrial Methanol Reactors in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation,” Chem. Eng. Process., 44(8), pp. 911–921. [CrossRef]
Parvasi, P. , Rahimpour, M. R. , and Jahanmiri, A. , 2008, “ Incorporation of Dynamic Flexibility in the Design of a Methanol Synthesis Loop in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation,” Chem. Eng. Technol., 31(1), pp. 116–132. [CrossRef]
Aroudam, E. H. , 2002, “ Numerical Modelling of Heat and Mass Transfer in Adsorption Solar Reactor of Ammonia on Active Carbon,” Heat Mass Transfer, 39(1), pp. 47–55. [CrossRef]
Jiang, B. , Hao, L. , Zhang, L. , Sun, Y. , and Xiao, X. , 2015, “ Numerical Investigation of Flow and Heat Transfer in a Novel Configuration Multi-Tubular Fixed Bed Reactor for Propylene to Acrolein Process,” Heat Mass Transfer, 51(1), pp. 67–84. [CrossRef]
Rahimpour, M. R. , Dehnavi, M. R. , Allahgholipour, F. , Iranshahi, D. , and Jokar, S. M. , 2012, “ Assessment and Comparison of Different Catalytic Coupling Exothermic and Endothermic Reactions: A Review,” Appl. Energy, 99, pp. 496–512. [CrossRef]
Salehi, K. , Jokar, S. M. , Shariati, J. , Bahmani, M. , Sedghamiz, M. A. , and Rahimpour, M. R. , 2014, “ Enhancement of CO Conversion in a Novel Slurry Bubble Column Reactor for Methanol Synthesis,” J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 21, pp. 170–183. [CrossRef]
Parvasi, P. , Khosravanipour Mostafazadeh, A. , and Rahimpour, M. R. , 2009, “ Dynamic Modeling and Optimization of a Novel Methanol Synthesis Loop With Hydrogen-Permselective Membrane Reactor,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(9), pp. 3717–3733. [CrossRef]
Talaghat, M. R. , Jokar, S. M. , and Modarres, E. , 2017, “ Mathematical Modeling of Methyl Ester Concentration Distribution in a Continuous Membrane Tubular Reactor and Comparison With Conventional Tubular Reactor,” Heat Mass Transfer, 53(10), pp. 3099–3108. [CrossRef]
Thushari, P. G. I. , and Babel, S. , 2017, “ Biodiesel Production From Waste Palm Oil Using Palm Empty Fruit Bunch-Derived Novel Carbon Acid Catalyst,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140(3), p. 032204. [CrossRef]
Helmi, A. , Fernandez, E. , Melendez, J. , Tanaka, D. A. P. , Gallucci, F. , and Annaland, M. S. , 2016, “ Fluidized Bed Membrane Reactors for Ultra Pure H2 Production: A Step Forward Towards Commercialization,” Molecules, 21(3), p. 376. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Rahimpour, M. R. , Abbasloo, A. , and Sayyad Amin, J. , 2008, “ A Novel Radial-Flow, Spherical-Bed Reactor Concept for Methanol Synthesis in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation,” Chem. Eng. Technol., 31(11), pp. 1615–1629. [CrossRef]
Rahimpour, M. R. , Parvasi, P. , and Setoodeh, P. , 2009, “ Dynamic Optimization of a Novel Radial-Flow, Spherical-Bed Methanol Synthesis Reactor in the Presence of Catalyst Deactivation Using Differential Evolution (DE) Algorithm,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34(15), pp. 6221–6230. [CrossRef]
Viecco Guillermo, A. , and Caram Hugo, S. , 2002, “ The Spherical Reverse Flow Reactor,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(18), pp. 4005–4025. [CrossRef]
Sadeghi, S. , Vafajoo, L. , Kazemeini, M. , and Fattahi, M. , 2014, “ Modeling of the Methanol Synthesis Catalyst Deactivation in a Spherical Bed Reactor: An Environmental Challenge,” APCBEE Procedia, 10, pp. 84–90. [CrossRef]
Hirotani, K. , Nakamura, H. , and Shoji, K. , 1998, “ Optimum Catalytic Reactor Design for Methanol Synthesis With TECMRF-Zr Reactor,” Catal. Surv. Jpn., 2(1), pp. 99–106. [CrossRef]
Holland, J. , 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Bunnag, D. , and Sun, M. , 2005, “ Genetic Algorithm for Constrained Global Optimization in Continuous Variables,” Appl. Math. Comput., 171, pp. 604–636.
Augustoa, O. B. , Rabeaub, S. , Depinceb, P. , and Bennisb, F. , 2006, “ Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithms: A Way to Improve the Convergence Rate,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 19(5), pp. 501–510. [CrossRef]
Adham, A. M. , Mohd-Ghazali, N. , and Ahmad, R. , 2012, “ Optimization of an Ammonia-Cooled Rectangular Microchannel Heat Sink Using Multi-Objective Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA2),” Heat Mass Transfer, 48(10), pp. 1723–1733. [CrossRef]
Şencan Şahin, A. , 2012, “ Optimization of Solar Air Collector Using Genetic Algorithm and Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm,” Heat Mass Transfer, 48(11), pp. 1921–1928. [CrossRef]
Hayat, N. , Tahir Ameen, M. , Kashif Tariq, M. , Abbas Shah, S. N. , and Naveed, A. , 2017, “ Dual-Objective Optimization of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) Systems Using Genetic Algorithm: A Comparison Between Basic and Recuperative Cycles,” Heat Mass Transfer, 53(8), pp. 2577–2596. [CrossRef]
Márquez-Nolasco, A. , Conde-Gutiérrez, R. A. , Hernández, J. A. , Huicochea, A. , Siqueiros ., and Pérez, O. R. , 2017, “ Optimization and Estimation of the Thermal Energy of an Absorber With Graphite Disks by Using Direct and Inverse Neural Network,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140(2), p. 020906. [CrossRef]
Khadse, A. , Blanchette, L. , Kapat, B. J. , Vasu, S. , Hossain, J. , and Donazzolo, A. , 2018, “ Optimization of Supercritical CO2 Brayton Cycle for Simple Cycle Gas Turbines Exhaust Heat Recovery Using Genetic Algorithm,” ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol., 140(7), p. 071601. [CrossRef]
Kordabadi, H. , and Jahanmiri, A. , 2005, “ Optimization of Methanol Synthesis Reactor Using Genetic Algorithms,” Chem. Eng. J., 108(3), pp. 249–255. [CrossRef]
Kordabadi, H. , and Jahanmiri, A. , 2007, “ A Pseudo-Dynamic Optimization of a Dual-Stage Methanol Synthesis Reactor in the Face of Catalyst Deactivation,” Chem. Eng. Process., 46(12), pp. 1299–1309. [CrossRef]
Savoretti, A. A. , Borio, D. O. , Bucala, V. , and Porras, J. A. , 1999, “ Non-Adiabatic Radial-Flow Reactor for Styrene Production,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(2), pp. 205–213. [CrossRef]
Graaf, G. H. , Stamhuis, E. J. , and Beenackers, A. A. C. M. , 1988, “ Kinetics of Low-Pressure Methanol Synthesis,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 43(12), pp. 3185–3195. [CrossRef]
Graaf, G. H. , Sijtsema, P. J. J. M. , Stamhuis, E. J. , and Joosten, G. E. , 1986, “ Chemical Equilibrium in Methanol Synthesis,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 41(11), pp. 2883–2890. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Conventional packed bed reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Cylindrical adiabatic radial flow reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Cylindrical nonadiabatic radial flow reactor: (a) front view and (b) top view

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Methanol mole fraction versus reactor radius in adiabatic radial flow reactor, (b) temperature versus reactor radius in adiabatic radial flow reactor, (c) methanol mole fraction versus reactor length in conventional reactor, and (d) temperature versus reactor length in conventional reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The comparison of (a) methanol mole fraction and (b) temperature profiles along the radius of adiabatic and nonadiabatic radial flow reactor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) Mole fraction of methanol versus different number of cooling tubes and (b) temperature versus reactor radius in nonadiabatic radial flow reactor for four different cooling tube numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The trend of optimum fitness function values obtained from GA for the feed and the inlet cooling water temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Methanol mole fraction at optimized and normal conditions



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In