Clinical follow-up studies of joint replacements indicate that debonding of the implant from the bone-cement is the first mechanical event of loosening. Debonding can occur due to unsustainable interface stresses, usually initiated from defects along the interface. Such defects, or flaws, are inevitably introduced during the surgical procedure and from polymerisation shrinkage. Debonding leads to increased stresses within the cement mantle. This study is concerned with modelling the propagation of a crack from the debonded region on the cement/implant interface under physiological loading conditions for different implant materials and prosthesis designs. Using the theory of linear fracture mechanics for bimaterial interfaces, the behaviour of a crack along an interface between implant materials, under various states of stress, is studied. Specifically, a model is developed to determine the conditions under which a debonded region, along an otherwise bonded interface, will either propagate along the interface or will “kink” into the cement mantle. The relationship between the stress state and the crack propagation direction at the interface is then predicted for different interface materials, and it is shown that different crack directions exist for different materials, even when the stress state is the same. Furthermore, the crack behavior is shown to be dependent on the ratio of normal stress to shear stress at the interface and this may be important for the design optimisation of load-bearing cemented prostheses. Finally, the likelihood that an interface crack will propagate into the cement mantle is explored using a suitable fracture criterion.

1.
Clech
J. P.
,
Keer
L. M.
, and
Lewis
J. L.
,
1985
, “
A Model of Tension and Compression Cracks with Cohesive Zone at a Bone-Cement Interface
,” ASME
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING
, Vol.
107
, pp.
175
182
.
2.
Culleton
T. P.
,
Prendergast
P. J.
, and
Taylor
D.
,
1993
, “
Fatigue Failure in the Cement Mantle of an Artificial Hip Joint
,”
Clinical Materials
, Vol.
12
, pp.
95
102
.
3.
Dalstra, M., 1993, “Biomechanical Aspects of the Pelvic Bone and Design Criteria for Acetabular Prostheses,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
4.
Gharpuray
V. M.
,
Dundurs
J.
, and
Keer
L. M.
,
1991
, “
A Crack Terminating at a Slipping Interface Between Two Materials
,” ASME
Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
58
, pp.
960
963
.
5.
Harrigan
T. P.
,
Kareh
J. A.
,
O’Connor
D. O.
,
Burke
D. W.
, and
Harris
W. H.
,
1992
, “
A Finite Element Study of the Initiation of Failure of Fixation in Cemented Femoral Total Hip Components
,”
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
, Vol.
10
, pp.
134
144
.
6.
Harris
W. H.
,
1994
, “
Osteolysis and Particle Disease in Hip Replacement, A Review
,”
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
, Vol.
65
, pp.
113
123
.
7.
Helmke, H. W., Lednicky, C. L., and Tullos, H. S., 1992, “Porosity of the Cement/Metal Interface Following Cemented Hip Replacement,” Proceedings of the 38th Annual ORS, p. 364.
8.
Huiskes, R., 1985, “Properties of the Stem-Cement Interface and Artificial Hip Joint Failure,” J. L. Lewis and J. O. Galante, eds., A Workshop on the Bone-Implant Interface, pp. 86–101, Chicago, AAOS.
9.
Huiskes
R.
,
1993
, “
Mechanical Failure in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cement
,”
Current Orthopaedics
, Vol.
7
, pp.
239
247
.
10.
Huiskes, R., 1994, “New Approaches to Cemented Hip-Prosthetic Design,” G. H. Buchhorn and H.-G. Willert, eds., Technical Principles, Design and Safety of Joint Implants, pp. 227–236, Toronto. Hogrefe and Huber.
11.
Itou
S.
,
1988
, “
A Sandwiched Layer Containing an Interface Crack
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
, Vol.
29
(
5
), pp.
549
555
.
12.
James
S. P.
,
Schmalzried
T. P.
,
McGarry
F. J.
, and
Harris
W. H.
,
1993
, “
Extensive Porosity at the Cement-Femoral Prosthesis Interface: A Preliminary Study
,”
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
, Vol.
27
, pp.
71
78
.
13.
Jasty
M.
,
Maloney
W. J.
,
Bragdon
C. R.
,
O’Connor
D. O.
,
Haire
T.
, and
Harris
W. H.
,
1991
, “
The Initiation of Failure in Cemented Femoral Components of Hip Arthroplasties
,”
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
, Vol.
73-B
(
4
),
551
558
.
14.
Kindt-Larsen
T.
,
Smith
D. B.
, and
Jensen
J. S.
,
1995
, “
Innovations in Acrylic Bone Cement and Application Equipment
,”
Journal of Applied Biomaterials
,
6
,
75
83
.
15.
Krause
W.
, and
Mathis
R. S.
,
1988
, “
Fatigue Properties of Acrylic Bone Cements: Review of the Literature
,”
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
,
22(A1)
,
37
53
.
16.
Lee, A. J. C., 1994, “Rough or Polished Surface on Femoral Anchorage Stems?,” in G. H. Buchhorn and H.-G. Willert, eds., Technical Principles, Design and Safety of Joint Implants, pp. 209–211, Toronto. Hogrefe and Huber.
17.
Lewis
J. L.
,
Askew
M. J.
,
Wixson
R. L.
,
Kramer
G. M.
, and
Tarr
R. R.
,
1984
, “
The Influence of Prosthetic Stem Stiffness and of a Calcar Collar on Stresses in the Proximal End of the Femur With a Cemented Femoral Component
,”
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
,
66-A
(
2
),
280
286
.
18.
Linden
U.
,
1991
, “
Mechanical Properties of Bone Cement—Importance of the Mixing Technique
,”
Clinical Orthopaedics
,
272
,
274
278
.
19.
Maloney
W. J.
,
Jasty
M.
,
Burke
D. W.
,
O’Connor
D. O.
,
Zalenski
E. B.
,
Bragdon
C.
, and
Harris
W. H.
,
1989
, “
Biomechanical and Histological Investigation of Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasties
,”
Clinical Orthopaedics
,
249
,
129
140
.
20.
Mann
K. A.
,
Bartel
D. L.
,
Wright
T. M.
, and
Ingraffea
A. R.
,
1991
, “
Mechanical Characteristics of the Stem-Cement Interface
,”
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
,
9
,
798
808
.
21.
McCormack, B. A. O., and Prendergast, P. J., 1996, “Interface Failure in Implants Cemented With Different Bone-Cements: A Fracture Mechanics Analysis,” J. Middleton, M. L. Jones, and G. N. Pande, eds., 2nd International Symposium on Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Swansea. Gordon & Breach, Amsterdam, pp. 35–45.
22.
McCormack, B. A. O., and Prendergast, P. J., 1995, “Crack Propagation From Cement/Prosthesis Interface Defects,” R. M. Hochmuth, N. A. Langrana, and M. S. Hefzy, eds., 29th ASME Summer Bioengineering Conference, pp. 275–276, Beaver Creek. ASME.
23.
Prendergast
P. J.
,
Monaghan
J.
, and
Taylor
D.
,
1989
, “
Materials Selection in the Artificial Hip Joint Using Finite Element Stress Analysis
,”
Clinical Materials
,
4
,
361
376
.
24.
Raab
S.
,
Ahmed
A. M.
, and
Provan
J. W.
,
1981
, “
The quasi-static and fatigue performance of the implant/bone-cement interface
,”
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
,
15
,
159
182
.
25.
Rice
J. R.
,
1988
, “
Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks
,” ASME
Journal of Applied Mechanics
,
55
,
98
103
.
26.
Rice
J. R.
, and
Sih
G. C.
,
1965
, “
Plane Problems of Cracks in Dissimilar Media
,” ASME
Journal of Applied Mechanics
,
32
,
418
423
.
27.
Rimnac
C. M.
,
Wright
T. M.
, and
McGill
D. L.
,
1986
, “
The Effect of Centrifugation on the Fracture Properties of Acrylic Bone Cements
,”
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
,
68-A
(
2
),
281
287
.
28.
Robinson
R. P.
,
Wright
T. M.
, and
Burstein
A. H.
,
1981
, “
Mechanical Properties of Polymethylmethacrylate Bone Cements
,”
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
,
15
,
203
208
.
29.
Saha
S.
, and
Pal
S.
,
1984
, “
Mechanical Properties of Bone Cement: A Review
,”
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
,
18
,
435
462
.
30.
Verdonschot, N., 1995, “Biomechanical Failure Scenarios for Cemented Total Hip Replacements,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
31.
Verdonschot, N., and Huiskes, R., 1992, “The Application of Continuum Damage Mechanics to Preclinical Testing of Cemented Hip Prostheses: the Effects 1575 of Cement/Stem Debonding,” J. Middleton, G. Pande, and K. Williams, eds., Recent Advances in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, Swansea, pp. 50–57. BJI Ltd.
32.
Yuuki
R.
, and
Xu
J. Q.
,
1992
, “
Stress-Based Criterion for an Interface Crack Kinking out of the Interface in Dissimilar Materials
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
,
41
(
5
),
635
644
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.