The basis of a novel method for seawater desalination is outlined. In this work, pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) energy is obtained and used posteriorly for the reverse osmosis (RO) process for seawater desalination. Although PRO process coupled with an RO process has been studied in the past, however, in this work, there is a fundamental difference. Instead of bringing river or wastewaters with low salinity to the coast to be mixed with the seawater to run the PRO process, here is the seawater which is deliberately salinized. This technique has one important consequence, namely, that it is no longer required to be in places where rivers or wastewaters flow into the sea. This important difference eliminates this until now somehow paradoxical requirement if one considers that regions needing desalination are generally poor of water resources. On the other hand, it is not a coincidence that regions needing desalination plants are also regions with rich open salt deposits in the neighborhood; high evaporation, high concentration of salt deposits, and the need for freshwater are all of them directly correlated. Therefore, the idea proposed in the paper is consistent with the problem. The high evaporation in the region which is causing the need for desalination also is creating the solution to do this by using the salt deposits created. The economic feasibility of this method is preliminarily assessed in terms of the thermodynamic limits of extractable energy and then with the cost of the salt required to obtain this energy which is compared with the price from electrical grid. It was found that in order to reduce the amount of salt required for the process, and to make the cost of energy competitive, it is necessary to direct the hypersaline draw solution (draw solution) in a cyclic loop and to have the highest possible volume fraction for the nonsalinized solution (feed solution). Additional R&D is required to explore the possibilities of this concept.

References

1.
Reza
,
D.
, and
Al-Zubaidy
,
S. N.
,
2012
, “
Energy Efficient Reverse Osmosis Desalination Process
,”
Int. J. Environ. Sci. Dev.
,
3
(
4
), pp.
339
345
.
2.
Kowalski
,
G. J.
,
Modaresifar
,
M.
, and
Zenouzi
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Significance of Transient Exergy Terms in a New Tray Design Solar Desalination Device
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
1
), p.
011201
.
3.
Farahbod
,
F.
,
Mowla
,
D.
,
Jafari Nasr
,
M. R.
, and
Soltanieh
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Investigation of Solar Desalination Pond Performance Experimentally and Mathematically
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
134
(
4
), p.
041201
.
4.
Uche
,
J.
,
Serra
,
L.
, and
Valero
,
A.
,
2005
, “
Exergy Costs and Inefficiency Diagnosis of a Dual-Purpose Power and Desalination Plant
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
128
(
3
), pp.
186
193
.
5.
Klausner
,
J. F.
,
YiLi
,
Darwish
,
M.
, and
Mei
,
R.
,
2004
, “
Innovative Diffusion Driven Desalination Process
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
126
(
3
), pp.
219
225
.
6.
Cipollina
,
A.
, and
Micale
,
G.
,
2016
,
Sustainable Energy From Salinity Gradients
Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
7.
Burheim
,
O.
,
Sales
,
B. B.
,
Schaetzle
,
O.
,
Liu
,
F.
, and
Hamelers
,
H. V. M.
,
2012
, “
Auto Generative Capacitive Mixing for Power Conversion of Sea and River Water by the Use of Membranes
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
135
(
1
), p.
011601
.
8.
Karimi
,
L.
, and
Ghassemi
,
A.
,
2016
, “
An Empirical/Theoretical Model With Dimensionless Numbers to Predict the Performance of Electrodialysis Systems on the Basis of Operating Conditions
,”
Water Res.
,
98
, pp.
270
279
.
9.
Zhu
,
X.
,
Yang
,
W.
,
Hatzell
,
M. C.
, and
Logan
,
B. E.
,
2014
, “
Energy Recovery From Solutions With Different Salinities Based on Swelling and Shrinking of Hydrogels
,”
Environ. Sci. Technol.
,
48
(
12
), pp.
7157
7163
.
10.
Salamat
,
Y.
,
Rios Perez
,
C. A.
, and
Hidrovo
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Performance Improvement of Capacitive Deionization for Water Desalination Using a Multistep Buffered Approach
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
139
(
3
), p.
032003
.
11.
Salamat
,
Y.
,
Rios Perez
,
C. A.
, and
Hidrovo
,
C.
,
2016
, “
Performance Characterization of a Capacitive Deionization Water Desalination System With an Intermediate Solution and Low Salinity Water
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
138
(
3
), p.
032003
.
12.
Wang
,
Z.
,
Hou
,
D.
, and
Lin
,
S.
,
2016
, “
Gross vs. Net Energy: Towards a Rational Framework for Assessing the Practical Viability of Pressure Retarded Osmosis
,”
J. Membr. Sci.
,
503
, pp.
132
147
.
13.
Helfer
,
F.
,
Lemckert
,
C.
, and
Anissimov
,
Y. G.
,
2014
, “
Osmotic Power With Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Theory, Performance and Trends—A Review
,”
J. Membr. Sci.
,
453
, pp.
337
358
.
14.
Chung
,
H. W.
,
Banchik
,
L. D.
,
Swaminathan
,
J.
, and
Lienhard V
,
J. H.
,
2017
, “
On the Present and Future Economic Viability of Stand-Alone Pressure-Retarded Osmosis
,”
Desalination
,
408
, pp.
133
144
.
15.
Altaee
,
A.
, and
Sharif
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Pressure Retarded Osmosis: Advancement in the Process Applications for Power Generation and Desalination
,”
Desalination
,
356
, pp.
31
46
.
16.
Arias
,
F. J.
, 2017, “
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion by Deliberate Seawater Salinization
,”
Int. J. Energy Res.
, epub.
17.
Lin
,
S.
,
Straub
,
A. P.
,
Deshmukh
,
A.
, and
Elimelech
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Thermodynamic Limits of Extractable Energy by Pressure-Retarded Osmosis
,”
J. Energy Environ. Sci.
,
7
(
8
), pp.
2706
2714
.
18.
Straub
,
A. P.
,
Deshmukh
,
A.
, and
Elimelech
,
M.
,
2016
, “
Pressure-Retarded Osmosis for Power Generation From Salinity Gradients: Is It Viable?
,”
J. Energy Environ. Sci.
,
9
(
1
), pp.
31
48
.
19.
USGS,
2017
, “
Salt Statistics and Information
,” United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, accessed Oct. 5, 2017, https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/salt/
20.
Eurostat
,
2016
, “
Electricity Price Statics: Statics Explained
,”
Eurostat
, Luxembourg, UK, accessed Oct. 5, 2017, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Energy_price_statistics
You do not currently have access to this content.