The analytical model of Carey is extended and clarified for modeling Tesla turbine performance. The extended model retains differentiability, making it useful for rapid evaluation of engineering design decisions. Several clarifications are provided including a quantitative limitation on the model’s Reynolds number range; a derivation for output shaft torque and power that shows a match to the axial Euler Turbine Equation; eliminating the possibility of tangential disk velocity exceeding inlet working fluid velocity; and introducing a geometric nozzle height parameter. While nozzle geometry is limited to a slot providing identical flow velocity to each channel, variable nozzle height enables this velocity to be controlled by the turbine designer as the flow need not be choked. To illustrate the utility of this improvement, a numerical study of turbine performance with respect to variable nozzle height is provided. Since the extended model is differentiable, power sensitivity to design parameters can be quickly evaluated—a feature important when the main design goal is maximizing measurement sensitivity. The derivatives indicate two important results. First, the derivative of power with respect to Reynolds number for a turbine in the practical design range remains nearly constant over the whole laminar operating range. So, for a given working fluid mass flow rate, Tesla turbine power output is equally sensitive to variation in working fluid physical properties. Second, turbine power sensitivity increases as wetted disk area decreases; there is a design trade-off here between maximizing power output and maximizing power sensitivity.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
March 2018
Research-Article
Extending “Assessment of Tesla Turbine Performance” Model for Sensitivity-Focused Experimental Design
Fatemeh Hadi,
Fatemeh Hadi
Mem. ASME
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: fhadi@tnstate.edu
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: fhadi@tnstate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Muhammad K. Akbar
Muhammad K. Akbar
Mem. ASME
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: makbar@tnstate.edu
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: makbar@tnstate.edu
Search for other works by this author on:
Matthew J. Traum
Fatemeh Hadi
Mem. ASME
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: fhadi@tnstate.edu
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: fhadi@tnstate.edu
Muhammad K. Akbar
Mem. ASME
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: makbar@tnstate.edu
Mechanical and Manufacturing
Engineering Department,
Tennessee State University,
3500 John A. Merritt Blvd,
Nashville, TN 37209-1561
e-mail: makbar@tnstate.edu
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Advanced Energy Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 11, 2017; final manuscript received September 18, 2017; published online October 17, 2017. Editor: Hameed Metghalchi.
J. Energy Resour. Technol. Mar 2018, 140(3): 032005 (7 pages)
Published Online: October 17, 2017
Article history
Received:
September 11, 2017
Revised:
September 18, 2017
Citation
Traum, M. J., Hadi, F., and Akbar, M. K. (October 17, 2017). "Extending “Assessment of Tesla Turbine Performance” Model for Sensitivity-Focused Experimental Design." ASME. J. Energy Resour. Technol. March 2018; 140(3): 032005. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037967
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Fuel Consumption Prediction in Dual-Fuel Low-Speed Marine Engines With Low-Pressure Gas Injection
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
A Semi-Analytical Rate-Transient Analysis Model for Fractured Horizontal Well in Tight Reservoirs Under Multiphase Flow Conditions
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November 2024)
Experimental Investigation of New Combustion Chamber Geometry Modification on Engine Performance, Emission, and Cylinder Liner Microstructure for a Diesel Engine
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Downdraft Gasification for Biogas Production: The Role of Artificial Intelligence
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December 2024)
Related Articles
Generation of Complex Energy Systems by Combination of Elementary Processes
J. Energy Resour. Technol (November,2018)
Reviewer’s Recognition
J. Energy Resour. Technol (March,2018)
Special Issue: Selected Papers From the 42th International Technical Conference on Clean Coal and Fuel Systems
J. Energy Resour. Technol (June,2018)
Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics of a Closed Blade Cascade Wind Tunnel for Organic Vapors
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (May,2016)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Introduction I: Role of Engineering Science
Fundamentals of heat Engines: Reciprocating and Gas Turbine Internal Combustion Engines
Antilock-Braking System Using Fuzzy Logic
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Low-Cycle Fatigue Analysis of the Turbine Disk for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration High-Temperature Turbine Rig
Thermal Fatigue of Materials and Components