Transition characteristics of a boundary layer on a NACA0012 airfoil are investigated by measuring unsteady velocity using hot wire anemometry. The airfoil is installed in the incoming wake generated by an airfoil aligned in tandem with zero angle of attack. Reynolds number based on the airfoil chord varies from 2.0×105 to 6.0×105; distance between two airfoils varies from 0.25 to 1.0 of the chord length. To measure skin friction coefficient identifying the transition onset and completion, an extended wall law is devised to accommodate transitional flows with pressure gradient and nonuniform inflows. Variations of the skin friction are quite similar to that of the flat plate boundary layer in the uniform turbulent inflow of high intensity. Measured velocity profiles are coincident with families generated by the modified wall law in the range up to y+=40. Turbulence intensity of the incoming wake shifts the onset location of transition upstream. The transitional region becomes longer as the airfoils approach one another and the Reynolds number increases. The mean velocity profile gradually varies from a laminar to logarithmic one during the transition. The maximum values of rms velocity fluctuations are located near y+=15-20. A strong positive skewness of velocity fluctuation is observed at the onset of transition and the overall rms level of velocity fluctuation reaches 3.0–3.5 in wall units. The database obtained will be useful in developing and evaluating turbulence models and computational schemes for transitional boundary layer. [S0098-2202(00)01603-5]

1.
Mayle
,
R. E.
,
1991
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
509
537
.
2.
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1993
, “
The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines: A Discussion
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
115
, pp.
207
217
.
3.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
Blunden
,
A. R.
, and
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1994
, “
Effects of Free-Stream Turbulence and Adverse Pressure Gradients on Boundary Layer Transition
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
116
, pp.
392
404
.
4.
Gostelow
,
J. P.
, and
Walker
,
G. J.
,
1991
, “
Similarity Behavior in Transitional Boundary Layers Over a Range of Adverse Pressure Gradients and Turbulence Levels
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
113
, pp.
617
625
.
5.
Kuan
,
C. L.
, and
Wang
,
T.
,
1990
, “
Investigation of the Intermittent Behavior of Transitional Boundary Layer Using a Conditional Averaging Technique
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
,
3
, pp.
157
170
.
6.
Sohn, K. H., and Reshotko, E., 1991, “Experimental Study of Boundary Layer Transition with Elevated Freestream Turbulence on a Heated Flat Plate,” NASA CR 187068.
7.
Mislevy
,
S. P.
, and
Wang
,
T.
,
1996
, “
The Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on Momentum and Thermal Structures in Transitional Boundary Layers: Part 1—Mean Quantities
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
717
727
.
8.
Mislevy
,
S. P.
, and
Wang
,
T.
,
1996
, “
The Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on Momentum and Thermal Structures in Transitional Boundary Layers: Part 2—Fluctuation Quantities
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
118
, pp.
728
736
.
9.
Savill, A. M., 1995, Transition Modeling for Turbomachinery III, A Final Summary of ERCOFTAC Transition SIG progress for the 3rd workshop.
10.
Jeon
,
W. P.
, and
Kang
,
S. H.
,
1995
, “
Measurements of Transitional Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate Using a Computational Preston Tube Method
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
20
, pp.
29
37
.
11.
Nitsche, W., Thuenker, R., and Haberland, C., 1983, “A Computational Preston Tube Method,” Turbulent Shear Flows 4, Bradbury, L. J. S. et al., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 261–276.
12.
Kang, S.-H., Shin, S.-H., Lee, H.-K., and Jeon, W.-P., 1998, “Prediction of Wall Shear Stress in a Transitional Boundary Layer on a Flat Plate Based on the Principle of Computational Preston Tube Method,” 1998, Proceedings of the 4th KSME-JSME Fluids Engineering Conference, Pusan, Korea, pp. 489–492.
13.
Choi, M.-R., Choi, H., and Kang, S.-H., 1998, “Characteristics of the Late-Stage Transition in a Flat Plate Boundary Layer,” Proceedings of the 4th KSME-JSME Fluids Engineering Conference, Pusan, Korea, pp. 481–484.
14.
Yavzukurt
,
S.
,
1984
, “
A Guide to Uncertainty Analysis of Hot-Wire Data
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
106
, pp.
181
186
.
15.
Kerho
,
M. F.
, and
Bragg
,
M. B.
,
1997
, “
Airfoil Boundary-Layer Development and Transition With Large Leading-Edge Roughness
,”
AIAA J.
,
35
, No.
1
, pp.
75
84
.
16.
Walker
,
G. J.
, and
Gostelow
,
J. P.
,
1990
, “
Effects of Adverse Pressure Gradients on the Nature and Length of Boundary Layer Transition
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
112
, pp.
198
205
.
17.
Sharma
,
O. P.
,
Wells
,
R. A.
,
Schlinker
,
R. H.
, and
Bailey
,
D. A.
,
1982
, “
Boundary Layer Development on Turbine Airfoil Suction Surfaces
,”
ASME J. Eng. Power
,
104
, pp.
698
706
.
18.
Mayle
,
R. E.
and
Schulz
,
A.
,
1997
, “
The Path to Predicting Bypass Transition
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
119
, pp.
405
411
.
You do not currently have access to this content.