The emergence of fuel cell systems and hybrid fuel cell systems requires the evolution of analysis strategies for evaluating thermodynamic performance and directing design and development. A description and application of the recently developed tool for analyzing tubular SOFC based systems is presented. The capabilities of this tool include an analytical model for the tubular SOFC derived from first principles and the secondary equipment required to analyze hybrid power plants. Examples of such secondary equipment are gas turbine, reformer, partial oxidation reactor, shift reactor, humidifier, steam turbines, compressor, gas expander, heat exchanger, and pump. A “controller” is included which is essential for modeling systems to automatically iterate in order to meet the desired process or system design criteria. Another important capability that is included is to be able to arrange the various components or modules as defined by the user in order to configure different hybrid systems. Analysis of the hybrid cycle as originally proposed by Westinghouse (SureCell TM) indicates that the thermal efficiency of the cycle is quite insensitive to the pressure ratio, increasing from 65.5 percent to 66.6 percent on a lower calorific value of the fuel as the pressure ratio decreases from 15 to 6.5.

Issue Section:
Gas Turbines: Combustion and Fuels, and Cycle Innovations
Keywords:
solid oxide fuel cells, thermal analysis, heat engines, performance evaluation, fuel cell power plants
Topics:
Cycles, Fuels, Pressure, Solid oxide fuel cells, Gas turbines, Compressors, Water, Oxidation, Humidifiers, Heat, Fuel cells
1.
Hirschenhofer, J. H. et al., 1950, Fuel Cell Handbook (Revision 3), U.S. Department of Energy (DE94004072), Jan.
2.
Bevc, F. P., and Parker, W. G., 1995, “SureCell™ Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Plants for Distributed Power Applications,” PowerGen 1995, PennWell, Tulsa, OK.
3.
Ferguson, J. R., 1989, “Heat and Mass Transfer Aspects of SOFC Assemblies and Systems,” IEA Natural Gas Fueled Solid Oxide Fuel Cells and Systems, Proceedings of Charmey Workshop, July 2–6, Swiss Federal Office of Energy, Berne.
4.
Haynes, C. L., 1999 “Simulation of Tubular Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Behavior for Integration Into Gas Turbine Cycles,” Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technolgy, July.
5.
Bessette, N. F., 1994, “Modeling and Simulation for Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Systems,” Ph. D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.
6.
Peng
,
D.
, and
Robinson
,
D. B.
,
1976
, “
A New Two-Constant Equation of State
,”
Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam.
,
116
, No.
1
, pp.
59
–
64
.
7.
Schnackel
,
H. C.
,
1958
, “
Formulations for the Thermodynamic Properties of Steam and Water
,”
Trans. ASME
,
80
, pp.
959
–
966
.
8.
Gas Research Institute Report, 1993, “Evaluation of Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles,” Report No. GRI-93/0250, Aug.
9.
Spencer, R. C., et al., 1974, “A Method for Predicting the Performance of Steam Turbine-Generators,” General Electric Technical Bulletin GER–2007C, July.
10.
El-Masri, M. A., and Pourkey, F., 1986, “Prediction of Cooling Flow Requirements for Advanced Utility Gas Turbines Part 1: Analysis and Scaling of the Effectiveness Curve,” presented at ASME Winter Annual Meeting.
11.
Electric Power Research Institute Report, 1983, “Gas Turbine Evaluation (GATE) Computer Program,” Report No. AP-2871-CCM, Feb.
12.
Kern, D. Q., 1950, Process Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 563–621.
13.
Bessette, N. F., and George, R. A., 1996, Performance and Reliability of Westinghouse’s Air Electrode Supported Solid Oxide Fuel Cell at Atmospheric and Elevated Pressures, Mar., Denki Nagaku.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.