Abstract

Post-crack performance testing of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (FRC) is commonly undertaken using beam tests, such as ASTM C1609/C1609M, or panel tests, such as ASTM C1550. Both these tests demand the use of sophisticated servo-controlled test machines with data acquisition systems that record several hundreds to thousands of points in a typical test. Existing standard test methods include detailed specifications regarding how load should be applied and how deformation is measured, but they retain simple prescriptions regarding data acquisition and the total number of points required to adequately characterize the performance of a specimen. The present investigation has been undertaken to assess the effect of changes in the size of the deflection increment between recorded points in a load-deflection curve on the apparent outcome of a test. The results indicate that the maximum increment of deflection between successively acquired data points should be 0.020 mm for a ASTM C1550 panel test and 0.0035 mm for a ASTM C1609/C1609M beam test in order to limit potential errors in energy absorption and peak load to within acceptable levels. This is smaller than the current recommendation of 0.05 mm for ASTM C1550 and thus a change to a smaller measurement interval is recommended. For ASTM C1609/C1609M the currently recommendation for rate of data acquisition over the first span/900 deflection is adequate but thereafter the rate of acquisition should be increased by 50%.

References

1.
ASTM C1609/C1609M, “
Standard Test Method for Flexural Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Using Beam with Third-Point Loading)
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.02
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
846
854
.
2.
ASTM C1550, “
Standard Test Method for Flexural Toughness of Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Using Centrally Loaded Round Panel)
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
, Vol.
04.02
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
, pp.
768
781
.
3.
ASTM C39/C39M, “
Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
4.
ASTM C78, “
Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete (Using Simple Beam with Third-point Loading)
,”
Annual Book of ASTM Standards
,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
5.
Bernard
,
E. S.
, “
Correlations in the behavior of fibre reinforced shotcrete beam and panel specimens
,”
Mater. Struct.
, Vol.
35
,
2002
, pp.
156
164
.
6.
Bernard
,
E. S.
, “
Influence of Test Machine Control Method on Flexural Performance of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams
,” J. ASTM Int., Vol.
6
, No. 9,
2009
.
7.
Mindess
,
S.
,
Taerwe
,
L.
,
Lin
,
Y.-Z.
,
Ansari
,
F.
, and
Batson
,
G.
, “
Standard Testing
,” Chapter 10,
High Performance Fiber Reinforced Cement Composites 2
,
A. E.
Naaman
and
H. W.
Reinhart
, Eds.,
E&FN Spon
,
London
,
1995
, pp.
384
421
.
8.
Anderson
,
W. R.
,
Controlling Electrohydraulic Systems
, Marcel Dekker, NY,
1988
.
9.
Himelblau
,
H.
,
PierSol
,
A. G.
,
Wise
,
J. H.
, and
Grundvig
,
M. R.
,
Handbook for Dynamic Data Acquisition and Analysis
,
IEST
,
Rolling Meadows, IL
,
2006
.
10.
Tatnall
,
P. C.
, “
Significance of Tests and Properties of Concrete and Concrete-Making Materials
,” Chapter 49,
STP
169D,
J. F.
Lamond
and
J. H.
Pielert
, Eds.,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2006
.
11.
Wise
,
J. H.
, “
The Effects of Digitizing Rate and Phase Distortion Errors on the Shock Response Spectrum
,” Proc. IES,
1983
, pp.
36
43
.
12.
Atkinson
,
K. A.
,
An Introduction to Numerical Analysis
, 2nd ed.,
John Wiley and Sons
,
New York
,
1989
.
13.
Cruz-Uribe
,
D.
and
Neugebauer
,
C. J.
, “
Sharp error bounds for the trapezoidal rule and Simpson’s rule
,”
J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math.
, Vol.
3
, Issue
4
,
2002
, pp.
1
22
.
14.
Kirkup
,
L.
and
Frenkel
,
R. B.
,
An Introduction to Uncertainty in Measurement
,
Cambridge Univ. Press
,
New York
,
2006
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.