Traditional trial-and-error springback compensation methods have the problems of high scrap rate, low efficiency, high cost of fixtures and operator experience dependency. The method presented in this paper uses on-line measured springback data from the same batch to predict and compensate for springback. Because there are no springback data for the first bend, bend-rebend control is used to make the first bend to eliminate trial tubes. In addition to springback, relaxation and radial growth are also estimated and compensated for to make a bend more accurate. A process control method is developed to optimize the overall control strategy such that the overall tube error is minimized without increasing the required hardware accuracy. The optimal process control strategy has significantly higher accuracy than the traditional trial-and-error method. The details of statistical analysis of tube tolerance and adaptive bend correction algorithm are presented in Part 2 of the paper.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
forming processes, bending, manufacturing processes, mechanical variables control
Topics:
Errors, Geometry, Process control, Relaxation (Physics), Tube bending, Computer software, Algorithms, Tolerance analysis
1.
Fagerson, R., 1993, “Experimental Study of Rotary-draw Tube Bending: Influence of Tooling Adjustments on Springback,” Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota.
2.
Wang, W. C., and Stelson, K. A., 1991, “Computer Aided Manufacturing for Three-Dimensional Tube Bending with On-line Springback Compensation,” Transactions of the North American Manufacturing Research Institute of SME, Papers presented at: NAMRC XIX, May 22–24, 1991, University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, Missouri, pp. 70–76.
3.
von Karman, T. H., 1911, “Ueber die Formaenderung duennwandiger Rohre, insbesondere federnder Ausgleichrohre,” Zeitshrift des Vereines Deutscher Ingenieure, Vol. 55, No. 45, pp. 1889–1895.
4.
Clarke, K. W., 1967, “Metal Forming Machine,” U.S. Patent, No. 3,352,136, Nov. 14.
5.
Eaton, H. L., and Shevell, W. I., 1974, “Method and Apparatus for Automatically Compensated Tube Bending,” U.S. Patent, No. 3,821,525, June 28.
6.
LaFrasse, J., and Chastan, J., 1990, “Process and Apparatus for Monitoring Backspringing when Bending an Elongated Element Such as a Pipe,” U.S. Patent, No. 4,979,385, Dec. 25.
7.
Whiteside, J. A., and Morgan. B. W., 1994, “Bend Correction Apparatus and Method,” U.S. Patent, No. 5,275,031, Jan. 4.
8.
Gossard, D. C., and Allison, B. T., 1980, “Adaptive Brakeforming,” Eighth North American Manufacturing Research Conference Proceedings, pp. 252–256.
9.
Hardt
,
D. E.
, and
Chen
,
B.
,
1985
, “
Control of a Sequential Brakeforming Process
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
107
, pp.
141
–
145
.
10.
Wang, W., 1988, “Computer Aided Manufacturing for Three-dimensional Tube Bending with On-line Springback Compensation,” Master’s thesis, University of Minnesota.
11.
DeGarmo, P. E., 1969, Materials and Processes in Manufacturing, Collier-Macmillan, New York, p. 33.
12.
Stouffer, D. C., and Dame, L. T., 1996, Inelastic Deformation of Metals, Wiley, New York, pp. 101–131.
13.
Sabine
,
J.
,
1993
, “
Material Properties in Bending Tube
,”
Tube International
,
12
, No. 52,
January
, pp.
34
–
36
.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.