The computational effort for reliability based design optimization (RBDO) is no longer prohibitive even for detailed studies of mechanical integrity. The sequential approximation RBDO formulation and the use of surrogate models have greatly reduced the amount of computations necessary. In RBDO, the surrogate models need to be most accurate in the proximity of the most probable point. Thus, for multiply constrained problems, such as fatigue design problems, where each finite element (FE)-model node constitutes a constraint, the computational effort may still be considerable if separate experiments are used to fit each constraint surrogate model. This paper presents an RBDO algorithm that uses a single constraint approximation point (CAP) as a starting point for the experiments utilized to establish all surrogate models, thus reducing the computational effort to that of a single constraint problem. Examples of different complexities from solid mechanics applications are used to present the accuracy and versatility of the proposed method. In the studied examples, the ratio of the computational effort (in terms of FE-solver calls) between a conventional method and the single CAP algorithm was approximately equal to the number of constraints and the introduced error was small. Furthermore, the CAP-based RBDO is shown to be capable of handling over 10,000 constraints and even an intermittent remeshing. Also, the benefit of considering other objectives than volume (mass) is shown through a cost optimization of a truck component. In the optimization, fatigue-specific procedures, such as shot peening and machining to reduce surface roughness, are included in the cost as well as in the constraints.

1.
Chen
,
X.
,
Hasselman
,
T.
, and
Neill
,
D.
, 1997, “
Reliability Based Structural Design Optimization for Practical Applications
,”
Proceedings of the 38th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
, pp.
2724
2732
.
2.
Cheng
,
G.
,
Xu
,
L.
, and
Jiang
,
L.
, 2006, “
A Sequential Approximate Programming Strategy for Reliability-Based Structural Design
,”
Comput. Struct.
0045-7949,
84
, pp.
1353
1367
.
3.
Lee
,
I.
,
Choi
,
K.
,
Liu
,
D.
, and
Gorsich
,
D.
, 2008, “
Inverse Analysis Method Using MPP-Based Dimension Reduction for Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Nonlinear and Multi-Dimensional Systems
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
0045-7825,
198
, pp.
14
27
.
4.
Lee
,
I.
,
Choi
,
K.
,
Liu
,
D.
, and
Gorsich
,
D.
, 2010, “
Sensitivity Analyses of FORM-Based and DRM-Based Performance Measure (PMA) for Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO)
,”
Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng.
0029-5981,
82
, pp.
26
46
.
5.
Der Kiureghian
,
A.
, and
Dakessian
,
T.
, 1998, “
Multiple Design Points in First and Second-Order Reliability
,”
Struct. Safety
0167-4730,
20
, pp.
37
49
.
6.
Rahman
,
S.
, and
Wei
,
D.
, 2004, “
Design Sensitivity and Reliability-Based Structural Optimization by Univariate Decomposition
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
1615-147X,
27
(
11
), pp.
981
990
.
7.
The Mathworks, Inc.
, 2009, Matlab version 7.8.0.
8.
Altair Engineering, Inc.
, 2007, Hypermesh version 8.0.
9.
Systemes
,
D.
, 2006, Abaqus version 6.6-2, France.
10.
Engineering Center Steyr GmbH & Co KG
, 2006, FEMFAT version 4.6c, Austria.
11.
Rubinstein
,
R.
, 1981,
Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method
,
Wiley
,
New York, NY
.
12.
Madsen
,
H.
,
Krenk
,
S.
, and
Lind
,
N.
, 1986,
Methods of Structural Safety
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
.
13.
Youn
,
B.
,
Choi
,
K.
, and
Park
,
Y.
, 2003, “
Hybrid Analysis Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
125
(
2
), pp.
221
232
.
14.
Youn
,
B.
, and
Choi
,
K.
, 2004, “
Selecting Probabilistic Approaches for Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
42
(
1
), pp.
124
131
.
15.
Wang
,
L.
, and
Kodiyalam
,
S.
, 2002, “
An Efficient Method for Probabilistic and Robust Design With Non-Normal Distributions
,”
Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference
, pp.
1
13
.
16.
Liang
,
J.
,
Mourelatos
,
Z.
, and
Tu
,
J.
, 2004, “
A Single-Loop Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
Proceedings of ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences
, pp.
1
12
.
17.
Aoues
,
Y.
, and
Chateauneuf
,
A.
, 2010, “
Benchmark Study of Numerical Methods for Reliability-Based Design Optimization
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
1615-147X,
41
, pp.
277
294
.
18.
Zou
,
T.
,
Mourelatos
,
Z.
,
Mahadevan
,
S.
, and
Tu
,
J.
, 2008, “
An Indicator Response Surface Method for Simulation-Based Reliability Analysis
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
130
, p.
071401
.
19.
Kuczera
,
R. C.
, and
Mourelatos
,
Z. P.
, 2009, “
On Estimating the Reliability of Multiple Failure Region Problems Using Approximate Metamodels
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
0161-8458,
131
(
12
), p.
121003
.
You do not currently have access to this content.