A systematic investigation of the effects of specimen size on the cleavage fracture toughness of a typical pressure vessel steel is reported. Size dependence arises both from: (i) statistical effects, related to the volume of highly stressed material near the crack tip, that scales with the crack front length (B) and (ii) constraint loss, primarily associated with the scale of plastic deformation compared to the un-cracked ligament dimension (b). Previously, it has been difficult to quantify the individual contributions of statistical versus constraint loss size effects. Thus, we developed a single variable database for a plate section from the Shoreham pressure vessel using a full matrix of three point bend specimens, with B from 8 to 254 mm and b from 3.2 to 25.4 mm, that were tested at a common set of conditions. The University of California Santa Barbara (UCSB) b-B database was analyzed using three-dimensional finite element calculation of the crack tip fields combined with a cleavage model calibrated to the local fracture properties of the Shoreham steel. This paper focuses on the possible significance of these results to the Master Curve standard as formulated in ASTM E 1921. The statistical scaling procedure to treat variations in B used in E 1921 was found to be reasonably consistent with the UCSB b-B database. However, constraint loss for three point bend specimens begins at a deformation level that is much lower than the censoring limit specified in E 1921. Unrecognized constraint loss leads to a nonconservative, negative bias in the evaluation of To, estimated to be typically on the order of 10°C for pre-cracked Charpy specimens.

1.
American Society for Testing and Materials, 1998,
E 1921-97 Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, To, , for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range
, ASTM, West Conshohocken.
2.
Merkle
,
J. G.
,
Wallin
,
K.
, and
McCabe
,
D. E.
, 1998, Technical Basis for an ASTM Standard on Determining the Reference Temperature, To, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range (NUREG/CR-5504, ORNL/TM-13631), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington.
3.
Electric Power Research Institute, 1998, Application of Master Curve Fracture Toughness Methodology for Ferritic Steels, EPRI Report TR-108390, Palo Alto.
4.
Wallin
,
K.
,
Saario
,
T.
, and
Törrönen
,
K.
, 1984, “
Statistical Model for Carbide Induced Brittle Fracture in Steel
,”
Met. Sci.
0306-3453,
18
, pp.
13
16
.
5.
Nevalainen
,
M.
, and
Dodds
,
R. H.
, Jr.
, 1995, “
Numerical Investigation of 3D Constraint Effects on Brittle Fracture in SE(B) and C(T) Specimens
,”
Int. J. Fract.
0376-9429,
74
, pp.
131
161
.
6.
Rathbun
,
H. J.
,
Odette
,
G. R.
,
He
,
M. Y.
,
Lucas
,
G. E.
, and
Yamamoto
,
T.
, 2006, “
Size Scaling of Cleavage Toughness in the Transition: A Single Variable Experiment and Model Based Analysis (NUREG/CR-6790)
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington.
7.
Rathbun
,
H. J.
,
Odette
,
G. R.
,
He
,
M. Y.
, and
Yamamoto
,
T.
, 2006, “
Influence of Statistical and Constraint Loss Size Effects on Cleavage Fracture Toughness in the Transmission-A Model Based Analaysis
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944 (to be published).
8.
Anderson
,
T. L.
, 1995,
Fracture Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications
,
CRC Press
, Boca Raton.
9.
Petti
,
J.
, and
Dodds
,
R. H.
, Jr.
, 2004, “
Constraint comparisons for common fracture specimens: C(T)s and SE(B)s
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
71
(
18
), pp.
2677
2683
.
10.
Rathbun
,
H. J.
,
Odette
,
G. R.
, and
He
,
M. Y.
, 2000, “
Size Scaling of Toughness in the Transition: A Single Variable Experiment and Data Base Assessment
,”
Proceedings of the ASME PVP 2000
,
ASME
,
New York
,
412
, pp.
113
124
.
11.
Rathbun
,
H. J.
,
Odette
,
G. R.
, and
He
,
M. Y.
, 2001, “
On the Size Scaling of Cleavage Toughness in the Transition: A Single Variable Experiment and Model Based Analysis
,”
Proceedings of the International Congress on Fracture 10
, CD-ROM format.
12.
Rathbun
,
H. J.
,
Odette
,
G. R.
,
Yamamoto
,
T.
, and
Lucas
,
G. E.
, 2006, “
Influence of Statistical and Constraint Loss Size Effects on Cleavage Fracture Toughness in the Transition-A Single Variable Experiment and Database
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944
73
(
1
), pp.
134
157
.
13.
Hibbit
, Karlsson and Sorenssen, Inc., 1998, ABAQUS Users Manual 5.8.
14.
Odette
,
G. R.
, and
He
,
M. Y.
, 2000, “
A Cleavage Toughness Master Curve Model
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
0022-3115,
283
, pp.
120
127
.
15.
Gao
,
X.
,
Ruggieri
,
C.
, and
Dodds
,
R. H.
, Jr.
, 1998, “
Calibration of Weibull Stress Parameters Using Fracture Toughness Data
,”
Int. J. Fract.
0376-9429,
92
, pp.
175
200
.
16.
Joyce
,
J. A.
, and
Tregoning
,
R. L.
, 2001, “
Effects of Material Inhomogeneity on the To Reference Temperature in Thick Section A533B Plate
,”
Proceedings of the ASME PVP 2001
,
ASME
, New York,
423
, pp.
157
165
.
17.
Joyce
,
J. A.
, and
Tregoning
,
R. L
, 2001, “
Development of the To Reference Temperature From Precracked Charpy Specimens
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
68
(
7
), pp.
861
894
.
18.
Tregoning
,
R. L.
, and
Joyce
,
J. A.
, 2000, “
To Evaluation in Common Specimen Geometries
,”
Proceedings of the ASME PVP 2000
,
ASME
, New York,
412
, pp.
143
152
.
19.
Tregoning
,
R. L.
, and
Joyce
,
J. A.
, 2002, “
Application of a T-Stress Based Constraint Correction to A533B Steel Fracture Toughness Data
,” ASTM Special Technical Publication n. 1417, pp.
307
327
.
20.
Joyce
,
J. A.
, and
Tregoning
,
R. L.
, 2005, “
Determination of Constraint Limits for Cleavage Initiated Toughness Data
,”
Eng. Fract. Mech.
0013-7944,
72
(
10
), pp.
1559
1579
.
21.
Odette
,
G. R.
,
Yamamoto
,
T.
,
Kishimoto
,
H.
,
Sokolov
,
M
,
Spätig
,
P.
,
Yang
,
W. J.
,
Rensman
,
J.-W.
, and
Lucas
,
G. E.
, 2004, “
A Master Curve Analysis of F82H Using Statistical and Constraint Loss Size Adjustments of Small Specimen Data
,”
J. Nucl. Mater.
0022-3115,
329-333
(
2
), pp.
1243
1247
.
You do not currently have access to this content.