The interaction of an airblast wave with a structure, and the blast wave propagation around and over the structure is of significant importance. In order to protect a structure from the airblast produced by such explosive threats as terrorist bombs, a facility designer must possess an adequate knowledge of the expected blast wave loading. Of greatest importance are pressures and impulses on the directly loaded face of the structure, since it is typically subjected to the highest (reflected) pressures. It has long been recognized that reflected pressure time histories can be strongly influenced by pressure relief from the free edges of the loaded wall. The relief wave can significantly reduce the magnitude of the late-time portion of the positive reflected pressure phase, resulting in a substantial decrease in the peak impulse load. Most current predictive methodologies attempt to account for the relief wave and its effect on impulse. Unfortunately, these methods tend to be rather inaccurate because the exact manner in which the relief wave is manifested is not accurately defined. The US Army Engineer Research and Development Center has developed an improved methodology to predict the effect of pressure relief. This paper presents the basis for the methodology and its practical application.

1.
Dept. of Army
, 1990,
Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions
,
Technical Manual TM 5-1300
,
Department of the Army
, Washington, DC.
2.
Kinney
,
G. F.
, and
Graham
,
K. J.
, 1985,
Explosive Shocks in Air
,
Springer-Verlag
,
Berlin
.
3.
UCB
, 1952,
Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures
,
University of California
,
Berkeley
.
4.
Ohrt
,
A. P.
,
Lunderman
,
C. V.
, and
Rickman
,
D. D.
, 1998, “
Miniature-Scale Experiments of Airblast Diffraction Over Barrier Walls
,”
Proceedings of 69th Shock and Vibration Symposium
,
SAVIAC
,
Minneapolis
.
5.
Hopkinson
,
B.
, 1915, British Ordnance Board Minutes 13565.
6.
Hyde
,
D. W.
, 1988, “
CONWEP Users Manual
,” Instruction Report SL-88-1,
U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station
, Vicksburg, MS.
7.
Anon.
, 1998, “
Design and Analysis of Hardened Structures to Conventional Weapons Effects
,” TM 5-855-1 (DAHSCWEMAN-97), Departments of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and the Defense Special Weapons Agency, Washington, DC.
8.
Kingery
,
C. N.
, and
Bulmash
,
G.
, 1984, “
Airblast Parameters from TNT Spherical Air Burst and Hemispherical Surface Burst
,” ARBRL-TR-0255, Ballistic Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD.
9.
Zenith Data Systems
, 1986,
GW-Basic Version 3.2 User’s Reference
,
Zenith Data Systems
,
St. Joseph
,
MI
.
You do not currently have access to this content.