Abstract
A procedure for evaluating the stress results of a finite element analysis employing shell∕plate elements is proposed based on several previous papers by the authors and a review of other related publications. This procedure relates the stress levels produced by the finite element software to the provisions of ASME Sec. VIII, Div. 2 (ASME, 2004, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York).
Issue Section:
Design and Analysis
1.
ASME
, 2004, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York
.2.
ASME
, 2004, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Division 2
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York
.3.
Hechmer
, J. L.
, and Hollinger
, G. L.
, 1997, “3D Stress Criteria: Guidelines for Application
,” PVRC Grant 91–14 Final Report, ASME
, New York.4.
Hechmer
, J. L.
, and Hollinger
, G. L.
, 1987, “Three Dimensional Stress Criteria—Application of Code Rules
,” Design and Analysis of Piping, Pressure Vessels and Components
, W. E.
Short
II, A. A.
Dermenjian
, R. J.
McGrattan
, S. K.
Bhandari
, eds., ASME
, New York
, PVP Vol. 120
, pp. 189
–196
.5.
Hechmer
, J. L.
, and Hollinger
, G. L.
, 1989, “Code Evaluation of 3D Stresses on a Plane
,” Codes and Standards Applications for Design and Analysis of Piping, Pressure Vessels and Piping Components
, J. P.
Breen
R.
Seshardi
, G. L.
Hollinger
, B.
Wei
, S. Y.
Zamrik
, eds., ASME
, New York
, PVP Vol. 161
, pp. 33
–45
.6.
Hechmer
, J. L.
, and Hollinger
, G. L.
, 1991, “Three Dimensional Stress Criteria
,” Codes and Standards Applications for Design and Analysis of Piping, Pressure Vessels and Piping Components
, ASME
, New York
, PVP Vol. 210
.2, pp. 181
–191
.7.
Hechmer
, J. L.
, and Hollinger
, G. L.
, 1991, “The ASME Code and 3D Stress Evaluation
,” ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930, 113
, pp. 481
–487
.8.
Kroenke
, W. C.
, 1974, “Classification of Finite Element Stresses According to ASME Section 3 Stress Criteria
,” Pressure Vessels and Piping, Analysis and Computers
, ASME
, New York
, pp. 107
–140
.9.
Kroenke
, W. C.
, Addicott
, G. W.
, and Hinton
, B. M.
, 1975, “Interpretation of Finite Element Stresses According to ASME Section III
,” ASME Paper No. 75-PVP–63, pp. 1
–12
.10.
Porter
, M. A.
, and Martens
, D. H.
, 1998, “Stress Evaluation of a Typical Vessel Nozzle Using PVRC 3D Stress Criteria: Guidelines for Application
,” Analysis and Design of Composite, Process, and Power Piping and Vessels
, D. K.
Williams
, ed., ASME
, New York
, PVP-Vol. 368
, pp. 297
–301
.11.
Porter
, M. A.
, Martens
, D. H.
, and Marcal
, P.
, 1999, “On Using Finite Element Analysis for Pressure Vessel Design
,” Fracture, Design Analysis of Pressure Vessels, Heat Exchangers, Piping Components, and Fitness for Service
, ASME
, New York
, Vol. 388
.12.
ASME
, 2004, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section II
, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
, New York
.13.
Martens
, D. H.
, and Hsieh
, C. S.
, 1998, “Finite Element Investigation of a CBA Reactor for the Effects of Thermal Loading
,” Analysis and Design of Composite, Process, and Power Piping and Vessels
, D. K.
Williams
, ed., ASME
, New York
, PVP-Vol. 368
, pp. 139
–146
.14.
Ha
, J. L.
, Sun
, B. C.
, and Koplik
, B.
, 1995, “Local Stress Factors of a Pipe-Nozzle Under Internal Pressure
,” Nuclear Engineering and Design
, Elsevier Science
, S. A. Lausanne, Switzerland
, pp. 81
–91
.15.
Wichman
, K. R.
, Hopper
, A. G.
, and Mershon
, J. L.
, 1977, “Welding Research Council Bulletin No. 107
,” Welding Research Council
, New York.16.
Koves
, W. J.
, and Sanger
, R. J.
, 1996, “Evaluation of Pressure Design Criteria for Nozzles
,” International Conference on Pressure Vessel Technology
, ASME
, New York
, Vol. 2
, pp. 271
–279
.17.
Koves
, W. J.
, 1999, “Evaluation of Pressure Design Criteria for Nozzles (II)
,” Pressure Vessel and Piping Codes and Standards
, B.
Lubin
, ed., ASME
, New York
, PVP-Vol. 383
, pp. 49
–58
18.
Porter
, M. A.
, and Martens
, D. H.
, 1996, “A Comparison of the Stress Results From Several Commercial Finite Element Codes With ASME Section VIII, Division 2 Requirements
,” Structural Integrity, NDE, Risk and Material Performance for Petroleum, Process and Power
, M.
Prager
, ed., ASME
, New York
, PVP-Vol. 336
, pp. 341
–346
.19.
Porter
, M. A.
, Martens
, D. H.
, and Hsieh
, C. S.
, 1997, “A Comparison Finite Element Codes and Recommended Investigation Methodology
,” Fitness for Adverse Environments in Petroleum and Power Equipment
, M.
Prager
ed., ASME
, New York
, PVP-Vol. 359
, pp. 241
–246
.Copyright © 2008
by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.