Abstract

Analytical method has been developed to minimize and quantify the effect of crack length measurement interval Δa on the error due to the K gradient in the interpretation of da dN derived from crack growth test data using the secant method. The associated error has been quantified in a general form and used to demonstrate the specific errors due to the selection of average crack length a per ASTM E 647-91. Test Method for Measurements of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. It is shown that the selection of the geometric mean (a¯=a1a2) in the data analysis will reduce the associated error in the crack growth rate interpretation. It is recommended that ASTM E 647-91 be revised accordingly.

References

1.
James
,
L. A.
, “
Specimens Size Considerations in Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Testing
,”
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1981
, pp.
45
-
57
.
2.
Yoder
,
G. R.
,
Cooley
,
L. A.
, and
Crooker
,
T. W.
, “
Procedures for Precision Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Using Crack-Opening Displacement Techniques
,”
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1981
, pp.
85
-
102
.
3.
Bastenaire
,
F.
,
Lieurade
,
H. P.
,
Regnier
,
L.
, and
Truchon
,
M.
, “
Statistical Analysis of Fatigue Crack Growth
,”
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1981
, pp.
163
-
170
.
4.
Fong
,
J. T.
and
Dowling
,
N. E.
, “
Analysis of Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Data from Different Laboratories
,”
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1981
, pp.
171
-
193
.
5.
Ostergaard
,
D. F.
,
Thomas
, Jr.
, and
Hillberry
,
B. M.
, “
Effect of Δa Increment on Calculating da/dN from a versus N Data
,”
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1981
, pp.
194
-
204
.
6.
Miller
,
M. S.
and
Gallagher
,
J. P.
, “
An Analysis of Several Fatigue Crack Growth Rate (FCGR) Descriptions
,”
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1981
, pp.
205
-
251
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.